3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site’s initial three-yearexperience

Background3D printing is an ideal manufacturing process for creating patient-matched models (anatomical models) for surgical and interventional planning. Cardiac anatomical models have been described in numerous case studies and journal publications. However, few studies attempt to describe wider impact of the novel planning augmentation tool. The work here presents the evolution of an institution’s first 3 full years of 3D prints following consistent integration of the technology into clinical workflow (2012–2014) - a center which produced 79 models for surgical planning (within that time frame). Patient outcomes and technology acceptance following implementation of 3D printing were reviewed.MethodsA retrospective analysis was designed to investigate the anatomical model’s impact on time-based surgical metrics. A contemporaneous cohort of standard-of-care pre-procedural planning (no anatomical models) was identified for comparative analysis. A post-surgery technology acceptance assessment was also employed in a smaller subset to measure perceived efficacy of the anatomical models. The data was examined.ResultsWithin the timeframe of the study, 928 primary-case cardiothoracic surgeries (encompassing both CHD and non-CHD surgeries) took place at the practicing pediatric hospital. One hundred sixty four anatomical models had been generated for various purposes. An inclusion criterion based on lesion type limited those with anatomic models to 33; there were 113 cases matching the same criterion that received no anatomical model. Time-based metrics such as case length-of-time showed a mean reduction in overall time for anatomical models. These reductions were not statistically significant. The technology acceptance survey did demonstrate strong perceived efficacy. Anecdotal vignettes further support the technology acceptance.Discussion & conclusionThe anatomical models demonstrate trends for reduced operating room and case length of time when compared with similar surgeries in the same time-period; in turn, these reductions could have significant impact on patient outcomes and operating room economics. While analysis did not yield robust statistical powering, strong Cohen’s d values suggest poor powering may be more related to sample size than non-ideal outcomes. The utility of planning with an anatomical model is further supported by the technology acceptance study which demonstrated that surgeons perceive the anatomical models to be an effective tool in surgical planning for a complex CHD repair. A prospective multi-center trial is currently in progress to further validate or reject these findings.

[1]  Sources of bias in clinical trials. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Simon J. Sonntag,et al.  Using 3D Physical Modeling to Plan Surgical Corrections of Complex Congenital Heart Defects , 2016, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[3]  Shi-Joon Yoo,et al.  3D printing in medicine of congenital heart diseases , 2016, 3D Printing in Medicine.

[4]  N. Geller,et al.  Management practices and major infections after cardiac surgery. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  A. Krieger,et al.  Utilizing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology to Assess the Feasibility of High-Fidelity Synthetic Ventricular Septal Defect Models for Simulation in Medical Education , 2014, World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery.

[6]  Axel Krieger,et al.  Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. , 2015, Congenital heart disease.

[7]  A. Krieger,et al.  3D heart model guides complex stent angioplasty of pulmonary venous baffle obstruction in a Mustard repair of D-TGA. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  Stefan Weber,et al.  Three-dimensional printing of models for preoperative planning and simulation of transcatheter valve replacement. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[10]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[11]  Yan Chaowu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing as an Aid in Transcatheter Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defect With Rim Deficiency: In Vitro Trial Occlusion Based on a Personalized Heart Model. , 2016, Circulation.

[12]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Giovanni Biglino,et al.  3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability , 2015, BMJ Open.

[14]  J. Schussler,et al.  Advanced technology in interventional cardiology: A roadmap for the future of precision coronary interventions. , 2016, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[15]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2012, Circulation.

[16]  Sharyl L Sadowski Congenital cardiac disease in the newborn infant: past, present, and future. , 2009, Critical care nursing clinics of North America.

[17]  Javier Sanz,et al.  Use of a Three Dimensional Printed Cardiac Model to Assess Suitability for Biventricular Repair , 2016, World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery.

[18]  A. Pershad,et al.  Postinfarct VSD management using 3D computer printing assisted percutaneous closure. , 2015, Indian heart journal.

[19]  M. Biase,et al.  Left Atrial Appendage Closure Guided by 3D Printed Cardiac Reconstruction: Emerging Directions and Future Trends , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[20]  G. Biglino,et al.  Rapid prototyping compliant arterial phantoms for in-vitro studies and device testing , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[21]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Lifetime Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population From 2000 to 2010 , 2014, Circulation.

[22]  Javier Sanz,et al.  Application of Virtual Three-Dimensional Models for Simultaneous Visualization of Intracardiac Anatomic Relationships in Double Outlet Right Ventricle , 2015, Pediatric Cardiology.

[23]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Matthew S. Jackson,et al.  Replicating Patient-Specific Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis With Functional 3D Modeling , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[25]  Lihua,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing as an Aid in Transcatheter Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defect With Rim Deficiency , 2016 .

[26]  Kanwal M. Farooqi,et al.  3D Printing to Guide Ventricular Assist Device Placement in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[27]  David H. Frakes,et al.  Color-coded patient-specific physical models of congenital heart disease , 2014 .

[28]  L. Kiraly,et al.  Three-dimensional printed prototypes refine the anatomy of post-modified Norwood-1 complex aortic arch obstruction and allow presurgical simulation of the repair. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[29]  Joseph J. Vettukattil,et al.  Integration of Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Echocardiography for Hybrid Three-Dimensional Printing in Congenital Heart Disease , 2016, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[30]  S. Weber,et al.  Pediatric cardiac transplantation: three-dimensional printing of anatomic models for surgical planning of heart transplantation in patients with univentricular heart. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[31]  Cristina Suarez-Mejias,et al.  Three-dimensional patient-specific cardiac model for surgical planning in Nikaidoh procedure , 2014, Cardiology in the Young.

[32]  I. Valverde,et al.  A systematic review of image segmentation methodology, used in the additive manufacture of patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system , 2016, JRSM cardiovascular disease.

[33]  Juan-Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro,et al.  Applying the technology acceptance model to a Spanish City Hall , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Franklin Dexter,et al.  Changing Allocations of Operating Room Time From a System Based on Historical Utilization to One Where the Aim is to Schedule as Many Surgical Cases as Possible , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[35]  S. Garekar,et al.  Clinical Application and Multidisciplinary Assessment of Three Dimensional Printing in Double Outlet Right Ventricle With Remote Ventricular Septal Defect , 2016, World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery.

[36]  H. Baumgartner,et al.  Stereolithographic biomodeling to create tangible hard copies of cardiac structures from echocardiographic data: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  S. Mainigi,et al.  Patient specific 3D print of left atrial appendage for closure device , 2016, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[38]  C. Ahn,et al.  Surgical Planning by 3D Printing for Primary Cardiac Schwannoma Resection , 2015, Yonsei medical journal.

[39]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  Reducing Start Time Delays in Operating Rooms , 2008 .

[40]  Cristina Suarez-Mejias,et al.  3D printed models for planning endovascular stenting in transverse aortic arch hypoplasia , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[41]  Ralf Sodian,et al.  Three-dimensional printing in cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology: a single-centre experience. , 2015, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[42]  Kanwal M. Farooqi,et al.  Blood Pool Segmentation Results in Superior Virtual Cardiac Models than Myocardial Segmentation for 3D Printing , 2016, Pediatric Cardiology.

[43]  Y. Koyama,et al.  Morphological analysis and preoperative simulation of a double-chambered right ventricle using 3-dimensional printing technology. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[44]  Joseph J. Vettukattil,et al.  Ultrasound-Derived Three-Dimensional Printing in Congenital Heart Disease , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[45]  S. Little,et al.  3D Printed Modeling for Patient-Specific Mitral Valve Intervention: Repair With a Clip and a Plug. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[46]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..