Performance of a Propagation Delay Tolerant ALOHA Protocol for Underwater Wireless Networks

Underwater wireless networks have recently gained a great deal of attention as a topic of research. Although there have been several recent studies on the performance of medium access control (MAC) protocols for such networks, they are mainly based on simulations, which can be insufficient for understanding the fundamental behavior of systems. In this work we show a way to analyze mathematically the performance of an underwater MAC protocol. We particularly analyze a propagation delay tolerant ALOHA (PDT-ALOHA) protocol proposed recently [1]. In this scheme, guard bands are introduced at each time slot to reduce collisions between senders with different distances to the receiver, which have a great impact on acoustic transmissions. We prove several interesting properties concerning the performance of this protocol. We also show that the maximum throughput decreases as the maximum propagation delay increases, identifying which protocol parameter values realize the maximum throughput approximately. Although it turns out that exact expression for the maximum throughput of PDT-ALOHA can be quite complicated, we propose a useful simple expression which is shown numerically to be a very good approximation. Our result can be interpreted to mean that the throughput of PDT-ALOHA protocol can be 17-100% higher than the conventional slotted ALOHA, with proper protocol parameter values

[1]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[2]  Stewart N. Crozier Sloppy-slotted ALOHA , 1990 .

[3]  J. Heidemann,et al.  Underwater Sensor Networking : Research Challenges and Potential Applications , 2006 .

[4]  S. Crozier,et al.  Performance of 2-dimensional sloppy-slotted ALOHA random access signaling , 1992, 1992 IEEE International Conference on Selected Topics in Wireless Communications.

[5]  Roy D. Rosner,et al.  Distributed telecommunications networks via satellites and packet switching , 1982 .

[6]  Yuan Li,et al.  Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[7]  D. Owen Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas , 1965 .

[8]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  State of the art in protocol research for underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2006, MOCO.

[9]  P. Xie,et al.  Exploring Random Access and Handshaking Techniques in Large-Scale Underwater Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[10]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  The challenges of building mobile underwater wireless networks for aquatic applications , 2006, IEEE Network.

[11]  Hui Chen,et al.  Analyzing the Performance of Multi-hop Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007 - Europe.

[12]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[13]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Understanding spatio-temporal uncertainty in medium access with ALOHA protocols , 2007, Underwater Networks.

[14]  William Stallings,et al.  Data and Computer Communications , 1985 .

[15]  M.J. Ryan,et al.  A Propagation-delay-tolerant Collision Avoidance Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[16]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[17]  Jiejun Kong,et al.  Analysis of Aloha Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2006 .

[18]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2004, SIGBED.

[19]  Brian Neil Levine,et al.  A survey of practical issues in underwater networks , 2006, MOCO.

[20]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Shallow water acoustic networks , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[21]  Roy D. Rosner Value-added Networks (VANs) and Packet Switching , 1982 .