IN SITU STRENGTH, BULK DENSITY, AND WATER CONTENT RELATIONSHIPS OF A DURINODIC XERIC HAPLOCALCID SOIL

Compaction significantly reduces yield, quality, and profitability of irrigated crops in the US Pacific Northwest (PNW). Compaction assessment is usually done via bulk density measurement, even though crops respond negatively to excessive compaction largely because of root penetration (soil strength) limitations, not because of bulk density per se. For most soils, strength is thought to depend primarily on the interaction of water content and bulk density. We hypothesized that the soil strength (expressed as cone index) of an important PNW soil, Portneuf silt loam (Durinodic Xeric Haplocalcid), could be predicted for a given bulk density or water content and that it would increase with increasing bulk density and decreasing water content. To test this, the in situ cone index, the bulk density and water content profile of a 1.5-ha field was intensively sampled three times over a 2-year period, producing 688 data triplets. These data were used to produce soil water strength-bulk density response surface relationships using robust curve fitting. Cone index relationships were poor when derived from full-profile data sets but improved when data were segregated by depths. When grouped by depth intervals, cone indices of individual layers were always correlated strongly with soil water content, but not always with bulk density. The high calcium carbonate content of this soil was thought to have produced cementation effects on the cone index that varied with prolonged wetting versus prolonged drying. Variability among in situ strength penetrations and bulk density cores was also thought to reduce model accuracy. The difficulties inherent in developing the comprehensive relationships of soil strength to bulk density, and the overriding dependency of strength on the dynamic variable of water content, suggest great uncertainty when using bulk density sampling for realistic assessment of overall soil status affecting root restriction or crop performance unless sampling is extensive and the relationships between strength, bulk density, and water content have been intensively documented for an individual soil.

[1]  D. T. Hill,et al.  EFFECT OF VERTICAL TRENCHING OF CELLULOSEWASTE ON CROP YIELD AND HARDPAN RECONSOLIDATION , 1998 .

[2]  C. W. Doty,et al.  Simplified data analysis for an inexpensive manual analogue penetrometer , 1986 .

[3]  Craig Ross,et al.  Subsoiling and surface tillage effects on soil physical properties and forage oat stand and yield , 1997 .

[4]  T. Tsegaye,et al.  Intensive Tillage Effects On Spatial Variability Of Soil Physical Properties , 1998 .

[5]  J. V. Perumpral,et al.  Cone Penetrometer Applications — A Review , 1987 .

[6]  T. S. Colvin,et al.  The Soil Tilth Index : An evaluation and proposed modification , 1998 .

[7]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Effect of Mechanical Impedance on Cotton Root Growth , 1968 .

[8]  R. Sojka,et al.  Soil profile modification and cotton production , 1988 .

[9]  Nova Scotia,et al.  SOIL SURVEY of , 1969 .

[10]  A. Bengough,et al.  Mechanical impedance of root growth directly reduces leaf elongation rates of cereals , 1997 .

[11]  H. Becher.  Resistances to penetration of aggregates from loess-derived topsoils at different soil water tensions , 1998 .

[12]  D. Karlen,et al.  A conservation tillage research update from the Coastal plain soil and water conservation research center of South Carolina: A review of previous research , 1991 .

[13]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  Variability of Mechanical Impedance in a Tilled One-hectare Field of Norfolk Sandy Loam 1 , 1979 .

[14]  H. P. Denton,et al.  Relationships of Soil Texture and Structure to Corn Yield Response to Subsoiling1 , 1985 .

[15]  W. H. Morrison,et al.  Subsoiling for Sunflower Production in the Southeast Coastal Plains , 1990 .

[16]  W. Busscher,et al.  The effect of texture on strength of southeastern coastal plain soils , 1986 .

[17]  Howard M. Taylor,et al.  PENETRATION OF COTTON SEEDLINGN TAPROOTS AS INFLUENCED BY BULK DENSITY, MOISTURE CONTENT, AND STRENGTH OF SOIL , 1963 .

[18]  J. Ketcheson,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SOIL BULK DENSITY AND MATRIC PRESSURE ON SOIL RESISTANCE TO PENETRATION , 1972 .

[19]  H. D. Bowen,et al.  An Evaluation of Mechanical Impedance for Three Tillage Treatments on Norfolk Sandy Loam1 , 1978 .

[20]  C. R. Camp,et al.  Correction of cone index for soil water content differences in a coastal plain soil , 1997 .

[21]  H. Verplancke,et al.  Penetration resistance of gypsiferous horizons , 1997 .

[22]  R. W. Whitney,et al.  Particle Separation in a Pneumatic Conveying System , 1968 .

[23]  J. V. Perumpral,et al.  Moisture and Density Effect on Cone Index , 1981 .