Exploring some issues in acoustic full waveform inversion

The least-squares error measures the difference between observed and modelled seismic data. Because it suffers from local minima, a good initial velocity model is required to avoid convergence to the wrong model when using a gradient-based minimization method. If a data set mainly contains reflection events, it is difficult to update the velocity model with the least-squares error because the minimization method easily ends up in the nearest local minimum without ever reaching the global minimum. Several authors observed that the model could be updated by diving waves, requiring a wide-angle or large-offset data set. This full waveform tomography is limited to a maximum depth. Here, we use a linear velocity model to obtain estimates for the maximum depth. In addition, we investigate how frequencies should be selected if the seismic data are modelled in the frequency domain. In the presence of noise, the condition to avoid local minima requires more frequencies than needed for sufficient spectral coverage. We also considered acoustic inversion of a synthetic marine data set created by an elastic time-domain finite-difference code. This allowed us to validate the estimates made for the linear velocity model. The acoustic approximation leads to a number of problems when using long-offset data. Nevertheless, we obtained reasonable results. The use of a variable density in the acoustic inversion helped to match the data at the expense of accuracy in the inversion result for the density.

[1]  G. H. F. Gardner,et al.  FORMATION VELOCITY AND DENSITY—THE DIAGNOSTIC BASICS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS , 1974 .

[2]  Peng Shen,et al.  Differential Semblance Velocity Analysis Via Shot Profile Migration , 2005 .

[3]  Gregory Beylkin,et al.  A new slant on seismic imaging: Migration and integral geometry , 1987 .

[4]  R. Pratt Frequency-domain elastic wave modeling by finite differences : a tool for crosshole seismic imaging , 1990 .

[5]  René-Édouard Plessix,et al.  How to choose a subset of frequencies in frequency-domain finite-difference migration , 2004 .

[6]  Jean Virieux,et al.  Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: application to a thrust belt , 2004 .

[7]  P. Mora Elastic wave‐field inversion of reflection and transmission data , 1988 .

[8]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Diffraction tomography and multisource holography applied to seismic imaging , 1987 .

[9]  Ray perturbation theory, dynamic ray tracing and the determination of Fresnel zones , 1998 .

[10]  C. Pekeris,et al.  Theory of Propagation of Sound in a Half‐Space of Variable Sound Velocity under Conditions of Formation of a Shadow Zone , 1946 .

[11]  Marta Woodward,et al.  Wave-equation tomography , 1992 .

[12]  Seismic waveform tomography: Crosshole results from the Nimr field in Oman , 2001 .

[13]  W. A. Mulder,et al.  A comparison between one-way and two-way wave-equation migration , 2004 .

[14]  G. McMechan,et al.  2‐D full‐wavefield inversion for wide‐aperture, elastic, seismic data , 1992 .

[15]  Wim A. Mulder,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: The exact solution of the time-harmonic wave equation for a linear velocity profile , 2006 .

[16]  R. Snieder,et al.  The Fresnel volume and transmitted waves , 2004 .

[17]  R. Plessix,et al.  Finite-difference Iterative Migration By Linearized Waveform Inversion In the Frequency Domain , 2002 .

[18]  R. Plessix,et al.  Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-preserving migration , 2004 .

[19]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Multiparameter l 1 norm waveform fitting; interpretation of Gulf of Mexico reflection seismograms , 1999 .

[20]  William W. Symes,et al.  Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization , 1991 .

[21]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[22]  Peter Mora,et al.  Inversion = Migration + Tomography , 1988, Shell Conference.

[23]  R. G. Pratt,et al.  Full waveform tomography for lithospheric imaging: results from a blind test in a realistic crustal model , 2007 .

[24]  Guy Chavent,et al.  Migration‐based traveltime waveform inversion of 2-D simple structures: A synthetic example , 2001 .

[25]  Avoiding pitfalls of least‐squares inversion by using the energy‐flux error criterion , 2002 .

[26]  Mark Noble,et al.  Nonlinear elastic waveform inversion of land seismic reflection data , 1992 .

[27]  R. Shipp,et al.  Two-dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide-aperture marine seismic streamer data , 2002 .

[28]  A. Tarantola A strategy for nonlinear elastic inversion of seismic reflection data , 1986 .

[29]  L. Sirgue,et al.  The Importance of Low Frequency and Large Offset in Waveform Inversion , 2006 .

[30]  C. Bunks,et al.  Multiscale seismic waveform inversion , 1995 .

[31]  R. G. Pratt,et al.  Two‐dimensional velocity models from wide‐angle seismic data by wavefield inversion , 1996 .

[32]  P. Mora Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data , 1987 .

[33]  R. Pratt Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain; Part 1, Theory and verification in a physical scale model , 1999 .

[34]  Gary Martin,et al.  Marmousi2 An elastic upgrade for Marmousi , 2006 .

[35]  Peter Mora Inversion = Migration + Tomography , 1988, Shell Conference.

[36]  Mark Noble,et al.  Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion: Application to real data , 1990 .

[37]  R. G. Pratt,et al.  Efficient waveform tomography for lithospheric imaging: implications for realistic, two-dimensional acquisition geometries and low-frequency data , 2007 .

[38]  R. Gerhard Pratt,et al.  Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for selecting temporal frequencies , 2004 .

[39]  Jean Virieux,et al.  Quantitative imaging of complex structures from dense wide‐aperture seismic data by multiscale traveltime and waveform inversions: a case study , 2004 .