Requirements for labelling forest polygons in an object-based image analysis classification

The ability to spatially quantify changes in the landscape and create land-cover maps is one of the most powerful uses of remote sensing. Recent advances in object-based image analysis (OBIA) have also improved classification techniques for developing land-cover maps. However, when using an OBIA technique, collecting ground data to label reference units may not be straightforward, since these segments generally contain a variable number of pixels as well as a variety of pixel values, which may reflect variation in land-cover composition. Accurate classification of reference units can be particularly difficult in forested land-cover types, since these classes can be quite variable on the ground. This study evaluates how many prism sample locations are needed to attain an acceptable level of accuracy within forested reference units in southeastern New Hampshire (NH). Typical forest inventory guidelines suggest at least 10 prism samples per stand, depending on the stand area and stand type. However, because OBIA segments group pixels based on the variance of the pixels, fewer prism samples may be necessary in a segment to properly estimate the stand composition. A bootstrapping statistical technique was used to find the necessary number of prism samples to limit the variance associated with estimating the species composition of a segment. Allowing for the lowest acceptable variance, a maximum of only six prism samples was necessary to label forested reference units. All polygons needed at least two prism samples for classification. †Present address: School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA Present address: Math and Science Division, Babson College, Babson Park, MA, USA.

[1]  G..  A Comparison of Sampling Schemes Used in Generating Error Matrices for Assessing the Accuracy of Maps Generated from Remotely Sensed Data , 2008 .

[2]  Kimberly A. With.  The Landscape Ecology of Invasive Spread , 2002 .

[3]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  Fragmentation of Continental United States Forests , 2002, Ecosystems.

[4]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[5]  Josef Strobl,et al.  What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS , 2001 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[7]  T. Warner,et al.  81 DELINEATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL TREES IN THE EASTERN DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1999 .

[8]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[9]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[10]  T. Blaschke,et al.  Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis , 2006 .

[11]  H. Wiant,et al.  Is BAF 10 a Good Choice for Point Sampling , 1984 .

[12]  P. Chavez.  Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[13]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[14]  W. A. Wistendahl,et al.  The Use of the Bitterlich Sampling Technique in an Athens County, Ohio Forest , 1978 .

[15]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Mapping old growth forests on National Forest and Park Lands in the Pacific Northwest from remotely sensed data , 1993 .

[16]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[17]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[18]  W. A. Wistendahl,et al.  Sample Unit Selection for Studies of Herbaceous Oldfield Vegetation , 1976 .

[19]  Peter T. Wolter,et al.  Improved forest classification in the northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery , 1995 .

[20]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Thematic map accuracy assessment from the perspective of finite population sampling , 1995 .

[21]  Russell Congalton,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Second Edition , 1998 .

[22]  D. King,et al.  Comparison of pixel- and object-based classification in land cover change mapping , 2011 .

[23]  R. Congalton,et al.  A pilot study evaluating ground reference data collection efforts for use in forest inventory , 1992 .

[24]  P. Vitousek.  Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change , 1994 .

[25]  Wilma A. Mitchell,et al.  Point Sampling: Section 6.2.1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wildlife Resources Management Manual. , 1995 .

[26]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[27]  S. Frey,et al.  The role of spatial and temporal scale in colonization and spread of invasive shrubs in early successional habitats , 2006 .

[28]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[29]  Gregory Duveiller,et al.  Deforestation in Central Africa: Estimates at regional, national and landscape levels by advanced processing of systematically-distributed Landsat extracts , 2008 .

[30]  R. G. Oderwald,et al.  Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. , 1983 .

[31]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Forest practices as nonpoint sources of pollution in North America , 1993 .

[32]  E. E. Hardy,et al.  A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 964 , 2006 .

[33]  Patrick Bogaert,et al.  Forest change detection by statistical object-based method , 2006 .

[34]  Chen Xiuwan,et al.  Using remote sensing and GIS to analyse land cover change and its impacts on regional sustainable development , 2002 .

[35]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Thematic accuracy assessment of geographic object-based image classification , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[37]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .