The Perspective Structure of Visual Space

Luneburg’s model has been the reference for experimental studies of visual space for almost seventy years. His claim for a curved visual space has been a source of inspiration for visual scientists as well as philosophers. The conclusion of many experimental studies has been that Luneburg’s model does not describe visual space in various tasks and conditions. Remarkably, no alternative model has been suggested. The current study explores perspective transformations of Euclidean space as a model for visual space. Computations show that the geometry of perspective spaces is considerably different from that of Euclidean space. Collinearity but not parallelism is preserved in perspective space and angles are not invariant under translation and rotation. Similar relationships have shown to be properties of visual space. Alley experiments performed early in the nineteenth century have been instrumental in hypothesizing curved visual spaces. Alleys were computed in perspective space and compared with reconstructed alleys of Blumenfeld. Parallel alleys were accurately described by perspective geometry. Accurate distance alleys were derived from parallel alleys by adjusting the interstimulus distances according to the size-distance invariance hypothesis. Agreement between computed and experimental alleys and accommodation of experimental results that rejected Luneburg’s model show that perspective space is an appropriate model for how we perceive orientations and angles. The model is also appropriate for perceived distance ratios between stimuli but fails to predict perceived distances.

[1]  J M Foley,et al.  The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. , 1972, Vision research.

[2]  C. Erkelens.  The extent of visual space inferred from perspective angles , 2015, i-Perception.

[3]  L H HARDY,et al.  Investigation of visual space; the Blumenfeld alleys. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  W. Singer.  Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures. , 1995, Science.

[5]  T Indow,et al.  Parallel—and distance—alleys with moving points in the horizontal plane , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Walter Blumenfeld,et al.  Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse im Sehraume , 1913 .

[7]  Michael S Landy,et al.  The consistency of bisection judgments in visual grasp space. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[8]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Tarow Indow,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE LUNEBURG THEORY OF BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION (2):THE ALLEY EXPERIMENTS , 1962 .

[10]  W. Epstein.  Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1963 .

[11]  Frank H Durgin,et al.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Some problems in the geometry of visual perception , 2004, Synthese.

[13]  R. B. Angell.  The Geometry of Visibles , 1974 .

[14]  W. Ehrenstein.  Geometry in Visual Space—Some Method-Dependent (Arti)Facts , 1977, Perception.

[15]  L CHARNWOOD,et al.  Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. , 1948, The Optician.

[16]  The Geometry of Binocular Visual Space , 1980 .

[17]  H. Miike,et al.  Angle Illusion in a Straight Road , 2011, Perception.

[18]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Exocentric pointing in depth , 2008, Vision Research.

[19]  A. Zajączkowska.  Experimental test of Luneburg's theory; horopter and alley experiments. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space , 2000, Perception.

[21]  Harry Edwin Burton,et al.  The Optics of Euclid1 , 1945 .

[22]  T. Yamazaki.  Non-Reimannian approach to geometry of visual space: An application of affinely connected geometry to visual alleys and horopter , 1987 .

[23]  S. Lehar.  Gestalt isomorphism and the primacy of subjective conscious experience: A Gestalt Bubble model , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Change in perceived spatial directions due to context , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  M. Wagner,et al.  The geometries of visual space , 2006 .

[26]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Pappus in optical space , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  T SHIPLEY,et al.  Convergence function in binocular visual space. I. A note on theory. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  Paul M. Laporte,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision , 1950 .

[29]  Tarow Indow,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE LUNEBURG THEORY OF BINOCULAR SPACE PERCEPTION (1):THE 3-AND 4-POINT EXPERIMENTS , 1962 .

[30]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[31]  A. Battro,et al.  Riemannian Geometries of Variable Curvature in Visual Space: Visual Alleys, Horopters, and Triangles in Big Open Fields , 1976, Perception.

[32]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Visual perception of collinearity , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  T Indow,et al.  Parallel-Alleys and Distance-Alleys on Horopter Plane in the Dark , 1984, Perception.

[34]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Contribution of disparity to the perception of 3D shape as revealed by bistability of stereoscopic Necker cubes. , 2012, Seeing and perceiving.

[35]  José Antonio Aznar-Casanova,et al.  [On the metric of visual space]. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[36]  A A BLANK,et al.  The Luneburg theory of binocular visual space. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[37]  V. I. Musatov,et al.  An experimental study of geometric properties of the visual space , 1976, Vision Research.

[38]  W. Rosar,et al.  Visual Space as Physical Geometry , 1985, Perception.

[39]  L H HARDY,et al.  Investigation of visual space. , 1949, Archives of ophthalmology.

[40]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Exocentric pointing to opposite targets. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Is visual space Euclidean? , 2004, Synthese.

[42]  Stijn Oomes,et al.  Visual Rays are Parallel , 2010, Perception.

[43]  A. Higashiyama.  Curvature of binocular visual space a modified method of right triangle , 1984, Vision Research.

[44]  Franz Hillebrand,et al.  Theorie der scheinbaren Grösse bei binocularem Sehen , 1902 .

[45]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  On the Affine Structure of Perceptual Space , 2001, Psychological science.

[46]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On the role of external reference frames on visual judgements of parallelity. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[47]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large Systematic Deviations in Visual Parallelism , 2000, Perception.

[48]  C. Erkelens.  Perception of Perspective Angles , 2015, i-Perception.

[49]  Rudolf K. Luneburg,et al.  Metric of binocular visual space , 1950 .