Discrimination between stages of Alzheimer's disease with subsets of Mini-Mental State Examination items. An analysis of Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease data.

OBJECTIVE To identify minimal sets of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) items that can distinguish normal control subjects from patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), patients with mild from those with moderate AD, and those with moderate from those with severe AD. DESIGN Two randomly selected equivalent half samples. Results of logistic regression analysis from data from the first half of the sample were confirmed by receiver operating characteristic curves on the second half. SETTING Memory disorders clinics at major medical centers in the United States affiliated with the Consortium to establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). PARTICIPANTS White, normal control subjects (n = 412) and patients with AD (n = 621) who met CERAD criteria; nonwhite subjects (n = 165) and persons with missing data (n = 27) were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Three four-item sets of MMSE items that discriminate, respectively, (1) normal controls from patients with mild AD, (2) patients with mild from those with moderate AD, and (3) patients with moderate from those with severe AD. RESULTS The MMSE items discriminating normal controls from patients with mild AD were day, date, recall of apple, and recall of penny; those discriminating patients with mild from those with moderate AD were month, city, spelling world backward, and county, and those discriminating patients with moderate from those with severe AD were floor of building, repeating the word table, naming watch, and folding paper in half. Performance on the first two four-item sets was comparable with that of the full MMSE; the third set distinguished patients with moderate from those with severe AD better than chance. CONCLUSIONS A minimum set of MMSE items can effectively discriminate normal controls from patients with mild AD and between successive levels of severity of AD. Data apply only to white patients with AD. Performance in minorities, more heterogeneous groups, or normal subjects with questionable cognitive status has not been assessed.

[1]  J. Morris,et al.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assesment of Alzheimer's disease , 1989, Neurology.

[2]  M. Folstein,et al.  Limits of the ‘Mini-Mental State’ as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients , 1982, Psychological Medicine.

[3]  L. Robins,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  C. Brayne,et al.  The association of education and socioeconomic status with the Mini Mental State Examination and the clinical diagnosis of dementia in elderly people. , 1990, Age and ageing.

[5]  R. Roca.  Bedside cognitive examination , 1987 .

[6]  J A Colliver,et al.  Alzheimer patient evaluation and the mini-mental state: item characteristic curve analysis. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[7]  D P Salmon,et al.  The Mini-Mental State Examination in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[8]  M. Folstein,et al.  Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of the Mental Status Examination , 1985 .

[9]  B. Fogel,et al.  Bedside Cognitive Screening Instruments: A Critical Assessment , 1986, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[10]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[11]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[12]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  W. Eaton,et al.  Epidemiologic Field Methods in Psychiatry , 2012 .

[14]  L. Berg.  Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). , 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[15]  D Commenges,et al.  Validity of the Mini-Mental State examination as a screening instrument for cognitive impairment and dementia in French elderly community residents. , 1990, Neuroepidemiology.

[16]  S. Folstein,et al.  Differential cognitive impairment in alzheimer's disease and huntington's disease , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[17]  K. Engedal,et al.  The Mini‐Mental State Examination: Identifying the Most Efficient Variables for Detecting Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[18]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  R. Murden,et al.  Mini‐Mental State Exam Scores Vary with Education in Blacks and Whites , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  B B Reiss,et al.  The influence of education, social class and sex on Mini-Mental State scores , 1989, Psychological Medicine.

[21]  E. Larson,et al.  Effect of Education on the Mini‐Mental State Examination as a Screening Test for Dementia , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[23]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[24]  L. Berg,et al.  Clinical Dementia Rating , 1984, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[25]  L. George,et al.  Relationship of health and demographic characteristics to Mini-Mental State Examination score among community residents , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[26]  S. Bassett,et al.  Predicting Performance on the Mini‐Mental State Examination , 1987, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.