Effects of Spatial Variability of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity on Hortonian Overland Flow

Many field investigations have documented the existence of significant spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks in typical catchments, and several modeling studies have examined the effects of this variability on Hortonian surface runoff. However, these modeling studies had limitations, and some could not deal adequately with possible runoff-run-on phenomena where areas of low saturated hydraulic conductivities Ks are upstream of areas of higher Ks. The kinematic wave equations with interactive Smith-Parlange infiltration are solved by a finite-difference scheme on a characteristic computational net. It is shown that runoff hydrographs are strongly affected by trends in hydraulic conductivity, particularly for small runoff events. The results also show that Smith and Hebbert [1979] mislabeled outflow hydrographs, resulting in incorrect conclusions about the effects of linear trends in Ks. A simple technique is introduced to account for flow concentration in rills and the resulting reduced effective wetted areas subject to infiltration after rainfall ceases. It is shown that this mechanism has a major impact on runoff peaks, volumes, and time to peak for cases where Ks increases downslope.

[1]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water properties , 1973 .

[2]  Roger E. Smith,et al.  Border Irrigation Advance and Ephemeral Flood Waves , 1972 .

[3]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Mathematical properties of the kinematic cascade , 1972 .

[4]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling , 1988 .

[6]  R. Wooding,et al.  A hydraulic model for the catchment-stream problem: I. Kinematic-wave theory , 1965 .

[7]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  Geometric simplification of a distributed rainfall-runoff model over a range of basin scales. , 1990 .

[8]  J. Parlange,et al.  A parameter‐efficient hydrologic infiltration model , 1978 .

[9]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  KINEROS - a kinematic runoff and erosion model , 1995 .

[10]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff sensitivity to temporal and spatial rainfall variability at runoff plane and small basin scales , 1993 .

[11]  D. L. Brakensiek,et al.  Estimation of Soil Water Properties , 1982 .

[12]  Keith Loague,et al.  R‐5 revisited: 1. Spatial variability of infiltration on a small rangeland catchment , 1990 .

[13]  Curtis L. Larson,et al.  Modeling infiltration during a steady rain , 1973 .

[14]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope , 1980 .

[15]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  EFFECT OF STORM RAINFALL INTENSITY PATTERNS ON SURFACE RUNOFF , 1988 .

[16]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Similarity in Catchment Response: 1. Stationary Rainstorms , 1995 .

[17]  Roger E. Smith,et al.  A Monte Carlo Analysis of the hydrologic effects of spatial variability of infiltration , 1979 .

[18]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed , 1994 .