Estimating mean plant cover from different types of cover data: a coherent statistical framework

Plant cover is measured by different methods and it is important to be able to estimate mean cover and to compare estimates of plant cover across different sampling methods in a coherent statistical framework. Here, a framework that incorporates (1) pin-point cover data, (2) visually determined cover data, and (3) ordinal cover classification systems (e.g., Braun-Blanquet cover data) is presented and tested on simulated plant cover data. The effect of measurement error when applying a visual determination of plant cover is considered. Generally, the estimation of the mean plant cover was well-behaved and unbiased for all the three methods, whereas the estimate of the intra-plot correlation tended to be upward biased and especially so if the plant cover data was collected using the Braun-Blanquet method. It was surprising that the Braun-Blanquet sampling procedure provided mean plant cover estimates that were comparable to the other sampling schemes. This method shows promise in the attempt to use the large amount of historic Braun-Blanquet plant cover data in the investigation of the underlying causes for observed vegetation changes.

[1]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  Is Erica tetralix abundance on wet heathlands controlled by nitrogen deposition or soil acidification? , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[2]  Falko Glöckler,et al.  Vegetation databases for the 21st century , 2012 .

[3]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  Hierarchical and spatially aggregated plant cover data , 2013, Ecol. Informatics.

[4]  Miska Luoto,et al.  Rescuing Valuable Arctic Vegetation Data for Biodiversity Models, Ecosystem Models and a Panarctic Vegetation Classification , 2013 .

[5]  S. Bråkenhielm,et al.  Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring , 1995 .

[6]  Y. Qu,et al.  Symmetric Bernoulli Distributions and Generalized Binomial Distributions , 1993 .

[7]  Jun Chen,et al.  Plant cover estimation based on the beta distribution in grassland vegetation , 2008, Ecological Research.

[8]  D. T. Booth,et al.  Measuring Plant Cover in Sagebrush Steppe Rangelands: A Comparison of Methods , 2006, Environmental management.

[9]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Reproducibility of species lists, visual cover estimates and frequency methods for recording high‐mountain vegetation , 2010 .

[10]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  Trend analyses of hierarchical pin-point cover data. , 2012, Ecology.

[11]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING PLANT COVER , 1987 .

[12]  Jun Chen,et al.  Distribution model and spatial variation of cover in grassland vegetation , 2006 .

[13]  Rf Daubenmire,et al.  Canopy coverage method of vegetation analysis , 1959 .

[14]  L. Klimeš,et al.  Scale-dependent variation in visual estimates of grassland plant cover , 2003 .

[15]  Martin Kent,et al.  Vegetation Description and Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Biologically generated spatial pattern and the coexistence of competing species , 1997 .

[17]  R. Ejrnæs,et al.  Intra‐specific spatial aggregation in acidic grasslands: effects of acidification and nitrogen deposition on spatial patterns of plant communities , 2013 .

[18]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants , 2000 .

[19]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  On the distribution of plant abundance data , 2009, Ecol. Informatics.

[20]  J. Fridman,et al.  Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data , 2008 .

[21]  K. A. Kennedy,et al.  SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE USE OF VISUAL ESTIMATES OF PLANT COVER IN BIOMONITORING , 1987 .

[22]  Christian Damgaard,et al.  Modelling pin-point plant cover data along an environmental gradient , 2008 .

[23]  Tomáš Herben,et al.  Spatio-temporal Patterns in Grassland Communities , 1999 .

[24]  C. Damgaard,et al.  Quantification of the intra-plot correlation in plant abundance data: A possible test of the neutral theory , 2009 .