Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States medicare population: updated analysis

Abstract Objective To provide an updated comparison of the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Methods Adults (≥65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014 were selected from the Medicare database and propensity scores matched 1:1 to balance baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs. warfarin. Two-part models were used to compare the stroke/SE- and major bleeding-related medical costs in each matched cohort. Results Of the 264,479 eligible patients, 38,740 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 76,677 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 20,955 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.38–0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.71; 95% CI 0.63–0.80) were associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.51–0.63) and dabigatran (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70–0.90) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.07–1.21) was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban and rivaroxaban had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; and apixaban and dabigatran had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs. Conclusions This real-world analysis showed DOACs to be associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding, and lower medical costs compared to warfarin. Among them, only apixaban appears to be associated with a significantly lower risk of all three outcomes collectively: stroke/SE, major bleeding, and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.

[1]  Jennifer H. Lin,et al.  Risks of Stroke and Mortality in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Rivaroxaban and Warfarin , 2019, Stroke.

[2]  G. Lip,et al.  Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients , 2019, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  M. Moonis,et al.  Letter by Jayaraman et al Regarding Articles, "Higher Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in Patients Taking Novel Oral Anticoagulants" and "Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: The ARISTOPHANES Study". , 2019, Stroke.

[4]  M. Reichman,et al.  Comparative Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Older Medicare Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. , 2019, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2019, Heart rhythm.

[7]  G. Lip,et al.  Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients , 2018, Stroke.

[8]  David M. Smith,et al.  Comparison of stroke- and bleed-related healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation and newly treated with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin , 2018, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[9]  D. Holmes,et al.  Burden of Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Ischemic Stroke in the United States. , 2018, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[10]  J. Trocio,et al.  Effect of Apixaban Versus Warfarin Use on Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Elderly Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. , 2017, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[11]  A. Amin,et al.  Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population , 2017, Current medical research and opinion.

[12]  P. Noseworthy,et al.  Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[13]  E. Antman,et al.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Menzin,et al.  Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke‐Related Healthcare Costs , 2013, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[15]  D. Singer,et al.  Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  James Floyd,et al.  A systematic review of validated methods for identifying atrial fibrillation using administrative data , 2012, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[17]  D. Atar,et al.  Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Risk of Bleeding With 2 Doses of Dabigatran Compared With Warfarin in Older and Younger Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) Trial , 2011, Circulation.

[19]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. , 2010, Chest.

[20]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[21]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  D. Battleman,et al.  Cost of atrial fibrillation in United States managed care organizations , 2009, Advances in therapy.

[23]  P. Austin Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  D. Singer,et al.  Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. , 2001, JAMA.

[25]  P A Lachenbruch,et al.  Comparisons of two‐part models with competitors , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  R. Jain,et al.  Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among Newly Diagnosed and Oral Anticoagulant-Naive Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Dabigatran or Warfarin in the United States , 2018, Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy.

[27]  R. Troughton,et al.  Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  E. Benjamin,et al.  Status of the epidemiology of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, The Medical clinics of North America.