Learning space preferences of higher education students

This paper aims to address higher education students’ learning space preferences. The study is based on a survey that involved 697 business management students of a Dutch University of Applied Sciences. The research focuses on preferred learning spaces for individual study activities, which require concentration, and preferred learning spaces for collaborative study activities with peers, which require communication. The results show that students consider their physical learning environment to be relevant and assume that learning spaces contribute to the outcome of their study activities. In contrast to the literature, the findings reveal that learning space preferences of students cannot substantially be attributed to behavioral aspects, such as their individual preference for privacy, interaction, and autonomy, nor to aspects of the physical environment related to the perceived relevance of comfort, aesthetics, ICT facilities, and layout. Student characteristics, such as gender, age, study year, or living situation, have a significant, but limited influence on the learning space preferences of students. Students mainly prefer learning spaces related to their learning activities. Students prefer learning space at home for individual activities. For collaborative study activities with peers, they prefer learning space at the university. Public spaces are not popular for study activities. Overall, students particularly prefer quiet learning spaces with the possibility to retreat as an individual or as a small group. Apparently, learning space preferences are more related to perceived effectiveness rather than to experience value.

[1]  Jacqueline C. Vischer,et al.  Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment , 2008 .

[2]  Andrew Pressman,et al.  Linking Architecture and Education: Sustainable Design of Learning Environments , 2008 .

[3]  C. Beard,et al.  Experiential learning : a best practice handbook for educators and trainers. (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[4]  Aaron M. Kuntz,et al.  A Changing Sense of Place: A Case Study of Academic Culture and the Built Environment , 2012 .

[5]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41. , 2009 .

[6]  Pieter Hogenbirk,et al.  Schools of the Future , 2001, WCCE.

[7]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[8]  Glen I. Earthman The Impact of School Building Condition and Student Achievement, and Behavior. , 1998 .

[9]  Mike Keppell,et al.  Spaces for knowledge generation. Final report , 2011 .

[10]  F. Herzberg One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? , 2008 .

[11]  Clare Newton,et al.  Transforming the twenty-first-century campus to enhance the net-generation student learning experience: using evidence-based design to determine what works and why in virtual/physical teaching spaces , 2014 .

[12]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design , 1981 .

[13]  Barry Haynes,et al.  Office productivity: a theoretical framework , 2007 .

[14]  A. Kazdin Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. , 2016 .

[15]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  Facilitating new ways of learning in dutch higher education , 2013 .

[16]  F. Herzberg One more time: how do you motivate employees? 1968. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[17]  M. Hagen,et al.  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[18]  E. L. Park,et al.  Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges , 2014 .

[19]  J. Brand,et al.  Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes , 2005 .

[20]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes , 2002 .

[21]  K. Wall,et al.  The Impact of School Environments : A literature review Produced for the Design Council , 2005 .

[22]  Christine H. Leland,et al.  LITERACY EDUCATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: IT'S TIME TO CLOSE THE FACTORY , 2002 .

[23]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  Classrooms With Nature Views , 2015 .

[24]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries , 2009 .

[25]  J. Voogt,et al.  A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies , 2012 .

[26]  L. Abeysekera,et al.  Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research , 2015 .

[27]  If Price,et al.  The impact of facilities on student choice of university , 2003 .

[28]  Mike Joy,et al.  An adaptive context-aware mobile learning framework based on the usability perspective , 2010, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[29]  Paul Temple,et al.  Learning spaces for the 21st century , 2007 .

[30]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  The influence of plants on productivity: A critical assessment of research findings and test methods , 2010 .

[31]  H.A.J.A. Appel Meulenbroek,et al.  An end user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts , 2011 .

[32]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education , 2015 .

[33]  Deborah Harrop,et al.  A Study Exploring Learners' Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences , 2013 .

[34]  Thor-Erik Sandberg Hanssen,et al.  The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian University , 2015 .

[35]  T. Jessop,et al.  Space frontiers for new pedagogies: a tale of constraints and possibilities , 2012 .

[36]  J. V. D. Linden,et al.  New Learning: Three Ways to Learn in a New Balance , 2000 .

[37]  Les Watson,et al.  Building the Future of Learning , 2007 .

[38]  Eric Sundstrom,et al.  Work Places: The Psychology of the Physical Environment in Offices and Factories , 1986 .

[39]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .

[40]  Regan A. R. Gurung,et al.  Focusing on how students study , 2010 .

[41]  G. Fleury-Bahi,et al.  Place-Identity in a School Setting: Effects of the Place Image , 2011 .

[42]  Sawyer A. Hunley,et al.  Measuring Library Space Use and Preferences: Charting a Path Toward Increased Engagement , 2008 .

[43]  G. Dewulf,et al.  Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education , 2016 .

[44]  Kelly E. Matthews,et al.  Social learning spaces and student engagement , 2011 .

[45]  K. Wall,et al.  A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future , 2007 .

[46]  G. Felsten Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective , 2009 .

[47]  B. Joseph Pine,et al.  The Experience Economy , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.

[48]  N. Marais,et al.  Connectivism as Learning Theory: The Force behind Changed Teaching Practice in Higher Education. , 2011 .

[49]  Pedro Gomis-Porqueras,et al.  Adopting New Technologies in the Classroom , 2010 .

[50]  P. Jamieson Designing more effective on‐campus teaching and learning spaces: a role for academic developers , 2003 .

[51]  AMA Alexi Marmot,et al.  The impact of psychological needs on office design , 2009 .

[52]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance , 2013 .

[53]  Andrew Harrison Accommodating the new economy: The SANE space environment model , 2002 .

[54]  Lucinda Barrett,et al.  The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis , 2015 .

[55]  Brenda H. Groen,et al.  Spatial support of knowledge production in higher education , 2013 .

[56]  Malcolm Brown,et al.  Trends in Learning Space Design , 2006 .

[57]  Mary M. Somerville,et al.  Collaborative design: a learner-centered library planning approach , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[58]  Angelika Mueller,et al.  The Great Good Place , 2016 .

[59]  Krystyna Sawon,et al.  An analysis of student characteristics and behaviour in relation to absence from lectures , 2012 .