GFscore: A General Nonlinear Consensus Scoring Function for High-Throughput Docking
暂无分享,去创建一个
Xavier Morelli | Stéphane Betzi | Karsten Suhre | Françoise Guerlesquin | Bernard Chétrit | K. Suhre | F. Guerlesquin | S. Betzi | X. Morelli | B. Chétrit
[1] Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al. Prediction of interface residues in protein–protein complexes by a consensus neural network method: Test against NMR data , 2005, Proteins.
[2] R. Glen,et al. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] D. Frank Hsu,et al. Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[4] T Lengauer,et al. The particle concept: placing discrete water molecules during protein‐ligand docking predictions , 1999, Proteins.
[5] G. Crippen,et al. Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions. , 1999 .
[6] R. Jarvis,et al. ClusteringUsing a Similarity Measure Based on SharedNear Neighbors , 1973 .
[7] P. Selzer,et al. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] Maria Kontoyianni,et al. Evaluation of library ranking efficacy in virtual screening , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[9] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.
[10] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.
[11] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[12] J. Irwin,et al. ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .
[13] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Application of Machine Learning To Improve the Results of High-Throughput Docking Against the HIV-1 Protease , 2004, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
[14] Jaime Prilusky,et al. Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins , 1999, Bioinform..
[15] D. J. Price,et al. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[17] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[19] Thierry Langer,et al. Impact of Scoring Functions on Enrichment in Docking-Based Virtual Screening: An Application Study on Renin Inhibitors , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Anthony E. Klon,et al. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[21] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[22] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] Li Xing,et al. Evaluation and application of multiple scoring functions for a virtual screening experiment , 2004, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[24] Didier Rognan,et al. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy , 2004, Proteins.
[25] R. W. Hansen,et al. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. , 2003, Journal of health economics.
[26] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Virtual Screening Using Protein—Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment. , 2004 .
[27] S S Cohen,et al. A strategy for the chemotherapy of infectious disease. , 1977, Science.
[28] Jie Liang,et al. CASTp: Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[29] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[30] P. Hajduk,et al. Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[31] L. Krippahl,et al. BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions , 2000, Proteins.
[32] H. Edelsbrunner,et al. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[33] Shaomeng Wang,et al. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[34] Johannes H. Voigt,et al. Comparison of the NCI Open Database with Seven Large Chemical Structural Databases , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[35] R. Clark,et al. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[36] F. Jørgensen,et al. A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.