Distributed and Antagonistic Contributions of Ongoing Activity Fluctuations to Auditory Stimulus Detection

Recent studies have shown that ongoing activity fluctuations influence trial-by-trial perception of identical stimuli. Some brain systems seem to bias toward better perceptual performance and others toward worse. We tested whether these observations generalize to another as of yet unassessed sensory modality, audition, and a nonspatial but memory-dependent paradigm. In a sparse event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging design, we investigated detection of auditory near-threshold stimuli as a function of prestimulus baseline activity in early auditory cortex as well as several distributed networks that were defined on the basis of resting state functional connectivity. In accord with previous studies, hits were associated with higher prestimulus activity in related early sensory cortex as well as in a system comprising anterior insula, anterior cingulate, and thalamus, which other studies have related to processing salience and maintaining task set. In contrast to previous studies, however, higher prestimulus activity in the so-called dorsal attention system of frontal and parietal cortex biased toward misses, whereas higher activity in the so-called default mode network that includes posterior cingulate and precuneus biased toward hits. These results contradict a simple dichotomic view on the function of these two latter brain systems where higher ongoing activity in the dorsal attention network would facilitate perceptual performance, and higher activity in the default mode network would deteriorate perceptual performance. Instead, we show that the way in which ongoing activity fluctuations impact on perception depends on the specific sensory (i.e., nonspatial) and cognitive (i.e., mnemonic) context that is relevant.

[1]  Adam R. Walczak,et al.  At the heart of the ventral attention system: The right anterior insula , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Biyu J. He,et al.  The fMRI signal, slow cortical potential and consciousness , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Ongoing Activity Fluctuations in hMT+ Bias the Perception of Coherent Visual Motion , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Palva,et al.  Very Slow EEG Fluctuations Predict the Dynamics of Stimulus Detection and Oscillation Amplitudes in Humans , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Spontaneous local variations in ongoing neural activity bias perceptual decisions , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K D Singh,et al.  Transient and linearly graded deactivation of the human default-mode network by a visual detection task , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Jed A. Meltzer,et al.  Biphasic hemodynamic responses influence deactivation and may mask activation in block‐design fMRI paradigms , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[11]  E. Denkova,et al.  Experiencing past and future personal events: Functional neuroimaging evidence on the neural bases of mental time travel , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  Rajita Sinha,et al.  Greater activation of the “default” brain regions predicts stop signal errors , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[14]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Boly,et al.  Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Extrinsic and intrinsic systems in the posterior cortex of the human brain revealed during natural sensory stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Buckner,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.2 Self-projection and the brain , 2022 .

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[21]  P. Fransson How default is the default mode of brain function? Further evidence from intrinsic BOLD signal fluctuations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  Time Course of Brain Activity during Change Blindness and Change Awareness: Performance is Predicted by Neural Events before Change Onset , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  A Core System for the Implementation of Task Sets , 2006, Neuron.

[26]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Brain signals for spatial attention predict performance in a motion discrimination task. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  P. Fransson Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[30]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Palva,et al.  Phase Synchrony among Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Quantitative prediction of perceptual decisions during near-threshold fear detection. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Network for auditory intrinsic alertness: a PET study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-Mode Activity during a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Source (or Part of the following Source): Type Article Title Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure Ground Perception Author(s) Internal State of Monkey Primary Visual Cortex (v1) Predicts Figure–ground Perception Materials and Methods , 2022 .

[37]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Scott,et al.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  Y. Yen,et al.  Deactivation of Sensory-Specific Cortex by Cross-Modal Stimuli , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  P. Morosan,et al.  Human Primary Auditory Cortex: Cytoarchitectonic Subdivisions and Mapping into a Spatial Reference System , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Long-Range Temporal Correlations and Scaling Behavior in Human Brain Oscillations , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  H Burton,et al.  Attending to and Remembering Tactile Stimuli: A Review of Brain Imaging Data and Single-Neuron Responses , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[45]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[49]  S. Makeig,et al.  Lapses in alertness: coherence of fluctuations in performance and EEG spectrum. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[51]  P. Coleman,et al.  Experiments in hearing , 1961 .