MRI signatures of brain age and disease over the lifespan based on a deep brain network and 14 468 individuals worldwide.

Deep learning has emerged as a powerful approach to constructing imaging signatures of normal brain ageing as well as of various neuropathological processes associated with brain diseases. In particular, MRI-derived brain age has been used as a comprehensive biomarker of brain health that can identify both advanced and resilient ageing individuals via deviations from typical brain ageing. Imaging signatures of various brain diseases, including schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, have also been identified using machine learning. Prior efforts to derive these indices have been hampered by the need for sophisticated and not easily reproducible processing steps, by insufficiently powered or diversified samples from which typical brain ageing trajectories were derived, and by limited reproducibility across populations and MRI scanners. Herein, we develop and test a sophisticated deep brain network (DeepBrainNet) using a large (n = 11 729) set of MRI scans from a highly diversified cohort spanning different studies, scanners, ages and geographic locations around the world. Tests using both cross-validation and a separate replication cohort of 2739 individuals indicate that DeepBrainNet obtains robust brain-age estimates from these diverse datasets without the need for specialized image data preparation and processing. Furthermore, we show evidence that moderately fit brain ageing models may provide brain age estimates that are most discriminant of individuals with pathologies. This is not unexpected as tightly-fitting brain age models naturally produce brain-age estimates that offer little information beyond age, and loosely fitting models may contain a lot of noise. Our results offer some experimental evidence against commonly pursued tightly-fitting models. We show that the moderately fitting brain age models obtain significantly higher differentiation compared to tightly-fitting models in two of the four disease groups tested. Critically, we demonstrate that leveraging DeepBrainNet, along with transfer learning, allows us to construct more accurate classifiers of several brain diseases, compared to directly training classifiers on patient versus healthy control datasets or using common imaging databases such as ImageNet. We, therefore, derive a domain-specific deep network likely to reduce the need for application-specific adaptation and tuning of generic deep learning networks. We made the DeepBrainNet model freely available to the community for MRI-based evaluation of brain health in the general population and over the lifespan.

[1]  Bilwaj Gaonkar,et al.  Multi-atlas skull-stripping. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[2]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Human neuroimaging as a “Big Data” science , 2013, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[3]  R. Marioni,et al.  Brain age and other bodily ‘ages’: implications for neuropsychiatry , 2018, Molecular Psychiatry.

[4]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  Tomas Novak,et al.  Brain Age in Early Stages of Bipolar Disorders or Schizophrenia , 2019, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[6]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data , 2014, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[7]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions , 2017, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Wesley K. Thompson,et al.  A Nonlinear Simulation Framework Supports Adjusting for Age When Analyzing BrainAGE , 2018, bioRxiv.

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Konstantinos Kamnitsas,et al.  Efficient multi‐scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  A. Toga,et al.  Mapping the human connectome. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Structural neuroimaging as clinical predictor: A review of machine learning applications , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[14]  Christopher R Madan,et al.  Predicting age from cortical structure across the lifespan , 2018, bioRxiv.

[15]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Imaging patterns of brain development and their relationship to cognition. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Using deep learning to investigate the neuroimaging correlates of psychiatric and neurological disorders: Methods and applications , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[17]  H. Stefánsson,et al.  Brain age prediction using deep learning uncovers associated sequence variants , 2019, Nature Communications.

[18]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Andreas Willfahrt,et al.  Polymer gels with tunable ionic Seebeck coefficient for ultra-sensitive printed thermopiles , 2019, Nature Communications.

[20]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  Vijay K. Venkatraman,et al.  Neuroanatomical Assessment of Biological Maturity , 2012, Current Biology.

[22]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker , 2016, NeuroImage.

[24]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  H. Völzke,et al.  Advanced brain aging: relationship with epidemiologic and genetic risk factors, and overlap with Alzheimer disease atrophy patterns , 2016, Translational Psychiatry.

[26]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Brain age predicts mortality , 2017, Molecular Psychiatry.

[27]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning? , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  R. Gur,et al.  Multisite Machine Learning Analysis Provides a Robust Structural Imaging Signature of Schizophrenia Detectable Across Diverse Patient Populations and Within Individuals , 2018, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[29]  P. Elliott,et al.  UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , 2015, PLoS medicine.

[30]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  BrainAGE in Mild Cognitive Impaired Patients: Predicting the Conversion to Alzheimer’s Disease , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  A. Dale,et al.  Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[32]  Christian Gaser,et al.  Advanced BrainAGE in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[33]  Syed Muhammad Anwar,et al.  Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Review , 2017, Journal of Medical Systems.

[34]  S. Resnick,et al.  Longitudinal progression of Alzheimer's-like patterns of atrophy in normal older adults: the SPARE-AD index. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.