Random walk models for DNA synapsis by resolvase.

During site-specific recombination by resolvase, the protein binds to two sites on a supercoiled DNA molecule and the loaded sites then interact with each other to form a synaptic complex. The kinetics of synapsis show non-exponential behaviour extending over five log units of time and are independent of the length of the DNA molecule and the length of DNA between the sites. In this study, numerical models were developed in order to account for how fluctuations in the structure of supercoiled DNA might lead to the juxtaposition of distant sites in a manner consistent with the experimental data on synapsis by resolvase. Models where the juxtaposition arises from fluctuations around branch points in the superhelix failed to match the data: they yielded non-exponential kinetics but only over two log units of time and they predicted longer synapsis times for both larger DNA molecules and larger inter-site spacings. In another model, one fraction of the juxtaposition events gives rise directly to the productive complex while the remaining fraction initially yields a non-productive complex: the latter molecules undergo no further fluctuations until the abortive synapse dissociates at the end of a delay period. This model again failed to match the experimental data. However, the inclusion of three sorts of non-productive complexes, each with a different delay constant, led to progress curves that concurred with the data. Schemes were also developed to account for the juxtaposition of three sites at a branch point in supercoiled DNA.

[1]  J. J. Salvo,et al.  The gamma delta resolvase bends the res site into a recombinogenic complex. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[2]  J. Dubochet,et al.  The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix. Possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  R. Hughes,et al.  Protein‐protein interactions directing resolvase site‐specific recombination: a structure‐function analysis. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Christian N. Parker,et al.  Dynamics of long-range interactions on DNA: The speed of synapsis during site-specific recombination by resolvase , 1991, Cell.

[5]  K Rippe,et al.  Action at a distance: DNA-looping and initiation of transcription. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[6]  N. Grindley Resolvase-Mediated Site-Specific Recombination , 1994 .

[7]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Biochemical topology: applications to DNA recombination and replication. , 1986, Science.

[8]  J. Griffith,et al.  Curved helix segments can uniquely orient the topology of supertwisted DNA , 1988, Cell.

[9]  D. Sherratt,et al.  Site-specific recombination by Tn3 resolvase. , 1989, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Effect of supercoiling on the juxtaposition and relative orientation of DNA sites. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[11]  S C Harvey,et al.  Action at a distance in supercoiled DNA: effects of sequence on slither, branching, and intramolecular concentration. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Marko,et al.  Statistical mechanics of supercoiled DNA. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Isolation and characterization of the Tn3 resolvase synaptic intermediate. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[14]  J. Peters,et al.  Action at a Distance , 2020 .

[15]  J. Marko,et al.  Communications between distant sites on supercoiled DNA from non-exponential kinetics for DNA synapsis by resolvase. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  P. Hagerman Flexibility of DNA. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[17]  S. Halford,et al.  Site-specific recombination at res sites containing DNA-binding sequences for both Tn21 and Tn3 resolvases. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  G. Chaconas,et al.  Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site , 1996, Cell.

[19]  C. Parker,et al.  Stereoselectivity of DNA catenane fusion by resolvase , 1994, Nature.

[20]  N. Grindley,et al.  The γδ resolvase induces an unusual DNA structure at the recombinational crossover point , 1987, Cell.

[21]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Processive recombination by the phage Mu Gin system: Implications for the mechanisms of DNA strand exchange, DNA site alignment, and enhancer action , 1990, Cell.

[22]  H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Conformational substates in proteins. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[23]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombination sites at the enhancer. , 1990, Science.

[24]  S. Halford,et al.  Definition of three resolvase binding sites at the res loci of Tn21 and Tn1721. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[25]  O. Berg Diffusion‐controlled protein–DNA association: Influence of segemental diffusion of the DNA , 1984, Biopolymers.

[26]  M. A. Watson,et al.  Rate and Selectivity of Synapsis ofresRecombination Sites by Tn3Resolvase , 1996 .

[27]  E. Siggia,et al.  Fluctuations and supercoiling of DNA. , 1994, Science.

[28]  M Frank-Kamenetskii,et al.  Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Structure of plectonemically supercoiled DNA. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[31]  S. Halford,et al.  Specificity of DNA recognition in the nucleoprotein complex for site-specific recombination by Tn21 resolvase. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.