Time domain analysis procedures for fatigue assessment of a semi-submersible wind turbine

Abstract Long term time domain analysis of the nominal stress for fatigue assessment of the tower and platform members of a three-column semi-submersible was performed by fully coupled time domain analyses in Simo-Riflex-AeroDyn. By combining the nominal stress ranges with stress concentration factors, hot spot stresses for fatigue damage calculation can be obtained. The aim of the study was to investigate the necessary simulation duration, number of random realisations and bin sizes for the discretisation of the joint wind and wave distribution. A total of 2316 3-h time domain simulations, were performed. In mild sea states with wind speeds between 7 and 9 m/s, the tower and pontoon experienced high fatigue damage due to resonance in the first bending frequency of the tower from the tower wake blade passing frequency (3P). Important fatigue effects seemed to be captured by 1 h simulations, and the sensitivity to number of random realisations was low when running simulations of more than 1 h. Fatigue damage for the tower base converged faster with simulation duration and number of random realisations than it did for the platform members. Bin sizes of 2 m/s for wind, 1 s for wave periods and 1 m for wave heights seemed to give acceptable estimates of total fatigue damage. It is, however, important that wind speeds that give coinciding 3P and tower resonance are included and that wave periods that give the largest pitch motion are included in the analysis.

[1]  Inge Lotsberg,et al.  Background for New Revision of DNV-RP-C203 Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures , 2010 .

[2]  Erin Elizabeth Bachynski,et al.  Global Analysis of Floating Wind Turbines: Code Development, Model Sensitivity And Benchmark Study , 2012 .

[3]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Short-Term Fatigue Analysis of Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Tower , 2011 .

[4]  Martin Kühn,et al.  Offshore support structure optimization by means of integrated design and controls , 2012 .

[5]  I. V. D. Hoven.  POWER SPECTRUM OF HORIZONTAL WIND SPEED IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE FROM 0.0007 TO 900 CYCLES PER HOUR , 1957 .

[6]  Robin S. Langley.  On the time domain simulation of second order wave forces and induced responses , 1986 .

[7]  Sumedha,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION , 2007 .

[8]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3 , 2010 .

[9]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Extreme Dynamic Structural Response Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Harsh Environmental Conditions , 2011 .

[10]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Joint Environmental Data at Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices , 2013 .

[11]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Simulation-Length Requirements in the Loads Analysis of Offshore Floating Wind Turbines , 2013 .

[12]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Modelling and Analysis of a Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine With a Central Tower With Emphasis on the Brace System , 2013 .

[13]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration, Continuation: Phase II Results of a Floating Semisubmersible Wind System: Preprint , 2013 .

[14]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[15]  Ervin Bossanyi,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook , 2001 .

[16]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Wind-wave misalignment effects on floating wind turbines: motions and tower load effects , 2014 .