Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE To develop criteria for symptomatic improvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), using outcome domain data from placebo-controlled clinical trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS Patient data from 5 short-term, randomized, controlled trials were used to assess equivalence, reliability, and responsiveness of multiple items in the 5 outcome domains for AS treatment: physical function, pain, spinal mobility, patient global assessment, and inflammation. At least one measure per domain was responsive (standardized response mean of > 0.5), except for the spinal mobility domain, which was omitted from the criteria. We developed and tested candidate improvement criteria in a random two-thirds subset from the 3 largest trials and used the remaining one-third for validation. These 3 largest trials included 923 patients (631 receiving NSAIDs, 292 in placebo groups). We selected the multiple domain definition that best distinguished NSAID treatment from placebo by chi-square test and that had a placebo response rate of < or = 25%. RESULTS Candidate definitions were changes in single domains and in multiple measure indices, as well as combinations of improvements in multiple domains. Worsening in a domain was defined as a change for the worse of > or = 20% and a net change for the worse of > or = 10 units on a scale of 0-100. Partial remission (for comparison purposes) was defined as an end-of-trial value of < 20/100 in each of the 4 domains. Among 20 candidate criteria, change of > or = 20% and > or = 10 units in each of 3 domains and absence of worsening in the fourth discriminated best in the development subset (51% of patients improved with NSAIDs, 25% with placebo; chi2 = 36.4, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation subset. Almost all patients satisfying the definition of partial disease remission at the end of the trial had also improved by this criterion. Among all 923 patients, improvement rates using this criterion were 49% for NSAID-treated patients and 24% for placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION Although further validation using data from new trials is still needed, we conclude that we have developed a clinically valid, easy-to-use measure of short-term improvement in AS.

[1]  D. Felson,et al.  Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  D. Felson,et al.  ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials : Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis: Response , 1998 .

[3]  M. Dougados,et al.  Efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a six-week controlled study with comparison against placebo and against a conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  M. Dougados,et al.  Ximoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis. A double blind placebo controlled dose ranging study. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[5]  M. Ward,et al.  Validity and sensitivity to change of spondylitis-specific measures of functional disability. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  M. Dougados,et al.  A double blind crossover placebo controlled trial of ximoprofen in as. , 1989, The Journal of rheumatology.

[7]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[9]  M. Dougados,et al.  Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug trial. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[10]  M. Dougados,et al.  A comparative study of the usefulness of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and the Dougados Functional Index in the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  M. Dougados,et al.  Preliminary core sets for endpoints in ankylosing spondylitis. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  M. Dougados,et al.  Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy, and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis. Progress report of the ASAS Working Group. Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[13]  M. Dougados,et al.  Evaluation of a functional index and an articular index in ankylosing spondylitis. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[15]  J P Nakache,et al.  Evaluation of a functional index for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  M. Prevoo,et al.  Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. , 1996, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.