How Do Product Users Influence Corporate Invention?

The extensive academic literature on innovation has long recognized product users as a potentially important source of ideas. Although prior work has primarily focused on understanding the unique motivations and knowledge that allow users to generate their own innovations, we extend existing theory to investigate the contribution of users to corporate invention. We draw on the knowledge-based view of the firm, evolutionary theory, and the user innovation literature to theorize that corporate inventions that integrate user knowledge will be of greater importance, contribute to a broader set of follow-on technologies, and occur earlier in the product life cycle than other corporate inventions do. We test these propositions with a large data set of medical device inventions. We find support for our predictions and discuss the implications of our results for the theoretical and empirical literature on organizational innovation.

[1]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Today's Edisons or Weekend Hobbyists: Technical Merit and Success of Inventions by Independent Inventors , 2004 .

[2]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[3]  Jeffrey T. Macher.  Technological Development and the Boundaries of the Firm: A Knowledge-Based Examination in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[5]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[6]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[7]  K. Schulman,et al.  Physician-industry cooperation in the medical device industry. , 2008, Health affairs.

[8]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  The Accidental Entrepreneur: The Emergent and Collective Process of User Entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[9]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[10]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[11]  Mary Tripsas.  Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change , 2008 .

[12]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[13]  William M. Riggs,et al.  Incentives to innovate and the sources of innovation: the case of scientific instruments☆ , 1994 .

[14]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[15]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[16]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[18]  Timothy S. Simcoe.  XTPQML: Stata module to estimate Fixed-effects Poisson (Quasi-ML) regression with robust standard errors , 2007 .

[19]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[20]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[22]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley , 1990 .

[23]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[24]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[25]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[26]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[27]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Quasi‐Likelihood Methods for Count Data , 2008 .

[28]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[29]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[31]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[32]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Towards Reconciling Transaction Cost Economics and the Knowledge-based View of the Firm: The Context of Interfirm Collaborations , 2002 .

[33]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[34]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[35]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[36]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[37]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[38]  K. Moore,et al.  Xenophobia in American Courts , 2004 .

[39]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[40]  S. Ogawa.  Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry , 1998 .

[41]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[42]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[43]  E. Hippel.  The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process , 1993 .

[44]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[45]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[46]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[47]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[48]  S. Klepper.  Industry Life Cycles , 1997 .

[49]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[50]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[51]  Lester C. Thurow,et al.  Inventing Modern America: From the Microwave to the Mouse , 2001 .

[52]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[53]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[54]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[55]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[56]  Michael Gort,et al.  Firm and Product Life Cycles and Firm Survival , 2002 .

[57]  Iwan von Wartburg,et al.  Why are some independent inventors 'heroes' and others 'hobbyists'? The moderating role of technological diversity and specialization , 2009 .

[58]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[59]  Tom Nicholas,et al.  Was Electricity a General Purpose Technology? Evidence from Historical Patent Citations , 2004 .

[60]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[61]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[62]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The Dynamics and Evolution of Industries , 1996 .

[63]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study , 2006 .