Comparison of Inpatient and Outpatient Preoperative Factors and Postoperative Outcomes in 2-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with inpatient admission following 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). A secondary aim was to compare outcomes between those treated on an inpatient versus outpatient basis. Methods Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of each variable on inpatient or outpatient selection for surgery. Statistical significance was defined by p-values <0.05. The factors considered were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, history of dyspnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cardiac intervention or surgery, steroid usage, and history of bleeding. In addition, whether the operation was performed by an orthopedic or neurosurgical specialist was analyzed. Results The number of 2-level CDA procedures increased from 6 cases reported in 2014 to 142 in 2016, although a statistically significant increase in the number of outpatient cases performed was not seen (p=0.2). The factors found to be significantly associated with inpatient status following surgery were BMI (p=0.019) and diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (p=0.043). There were no significant differences in complication and readmission rates between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Conclusion Patients undergoing inpatient 2-level CDA had significantly higher rates of obesity and diabetes requiring insulin than did patients undergoing the same procedure in the outpatient setting. With no difference in complication or readmission rates, 2-level CDA may be considered safe in the outpatient setting in appropriately selected patients.

[1]  K. Chin,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion , 2017, Spine.

[2]  S. Feng,et al.  Safety of outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, European Journal of Medical Research.

[3]  Zhao‐ming Zhong,et al.  Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. McGirt,et al.  Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  Zi-rong Li,et al.  An Updated Meta-Analysis Comparing Artificial Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease (CDDD) , 2015, Spine.

[6]  Zhiyu Zhou,et al.  Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2015, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[7]  X. Zou,et al.  Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[8]  R. Lehman,et al.  Outcomes following cervical disc arthroplasty: A retrospective review , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Lehman,et al.  Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[10]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease , 2014, Global spine journal.

[11]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Health state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplasty. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  E. Skarsgard,et al.  ACS national surgical quality improvement program: targeting quality improvement in Canadian pediatric surgery. , 2014, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[13]  Tsung-Hsi Tu,et al.  Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[14]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Epidemiological Trends in Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Diseases Between 2002 and 2009 , 2013, Spine.

[15]  Ming Liu,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Yusheng Qiu,et al.  Is Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Superior to Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease? A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  R. Wohns Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient cervical disc arthroplasty , 2010, Surgical neurology international.

[18]  R. Sasso,et al.  Safety of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed as Outpatient Surgery , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[19]  Licia K. Gaber-Baylis,et al.  National Trends in Anterior Cervical Fusion Procedures , 2010, Spine.

[20]  J. Friedman,et al.  Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series , 2009, BMC surgery.

[21]  Lawrence T. Post,et al.  American College of Surgeons , 2020, Definitions.

[22]  L. Nie,et al.  Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[23]  S. Nie,et al.  Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2014, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[24]  C. Ko,et al.  Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[25]  M. Boakye,et al.  National trends in spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2009, Surgical neurology.