Identifying Effective and Ineffective Retrofits for Distortion Fatigue Cracking in Steel Bridges Using Field Instrumentation

It is estimated that nearly 90% of all fatigue cracking is the result of out-of-plane distortion or other unanticipated secondary stresses at fatigue-sensitive details. Neither design specifications nor evaluation specifications provide any guidance on how to evaluate the in-service potential for fatigue cracking at these details. Often, as a result, the effectiveness of various retrofit procedures is questionable and ill fated. There are many examples where implemented retrofit procedures did not work and fatigue cracking reinitiated or continued. Implementation of one or two prototype retrofits is an attractive alternative to ensuring effective retrofits are developed where many details have to be retrofitted. Field instrumentation and testing is an effective means to determine the effectiveness and behavior of a given retrofit strategy. Behavior that may not be anticipated can be identified prior to installing retrofits on a large scale, thereby preventing future problems. This paper provides guidance on how to instrument these details and examines one example where initial retrofit strategies did not work, as demonstrated by their performance through field instrumentation.

[1]  Darrell F. Socie,et al.  Simple rainflow counting algorithms , 1982 .

[2]  B T Yen,et al.  GIRDER WEB BOUNDARY STRESSES AND FATIGUE , 1967 .

[3]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Bridge fatigue guide - design and details , 1977 .

[4]  Dennis R. Mertz,et al.  NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM 227 REPORT FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF FULL-SCALE WELDED BRIDGE ATTACHMENTS , 2015 .

[5]  Mark D. Bowman,et al.  Fatigue Behavior of Welded Diaphragm-to-Beam Connections , 2001 .

[6]  J. Fisher,et al.  FATIGUE AND FRACTURE IN STEEL BRIDGES , 1984 .

[7]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[8]  John W. Fisher,et al.  HOAN BRIDGE FORENSIC INVESTIGATION FAILURE ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT , 2001 .

[9]  F Moses,et al.  Fatigue evaluation procedures for steel bridges , 1987 .

[10]  R. J. Dexter,et al.  Application of hot-spot stress fatigue analysis to attachments on flexible plate , 1994 .

[11]  Alain Nussbaumer,et al.  RESISTANCE OF WELDED DETAILS UNDER VARIABLE AMPLITUDE LONG-LIFE FATIGUE LOADING , 1993 .

[12]  Robert J. Dexter,et al.  Fatigue and Fracture , 1999 .

[13]  E. W. C. Wilkins,et al.  Cumulative damage in fatigue , 1956 .

[14]  J W Fisher,et al.  Fatigue cracking of steel bridge structures; volume 1: a survey of localized cracking in steel bridges - 1981 to 1988 , 1989 .

[15]  John W. Fisher,et al.  DISTORTION-INDUCED FATIGUE CRACKING IN STEEL BRIDGES , 1990 .

[16]  John W. Fisher,et al.  EVALUATION OF FRACTURE OF LAFAYETTE STREET BRIDGE , 1977 .

[17]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Results of Field Measurements on the Williamsburg Bridge Orthotropic Deck, Final Report on Phase III , 2001 .

[18]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Report on Field Measurements and Assessment of the I-64 Kanawha River Bridge at Dunbar, West Virginia , 2001 .

[19]  Richard M. Bennett,et al.  Effect of Cycle-Counting Methods on Effective Stress Range and Number of Stress Cycles for Fatigue-Prone Details , 2000 .