Managing Buyer-supplier Relationships and Inter-organisational Competence Development

The work presented in this article is part of an action research project carried out in collaboration between Bang & Olufsen (B&O) and the Center for Industrial Production (CIP) of Aalborg University. The aim of the project is to investigate how end‐manufacturers can source new technology via innovative NPD‐related supplier relationships. Whereas prior work on buyer‐supplier relationships is dominated by a product‐oriented view, the present research has adopted a resource‐based (competence) view to develop a framework to guide companies in developing and handling competence‐based relationships with technology suppliers. The framework suggests four different types of inter‐organisational competence development, two of which will be illustrated using empirical data obtained through two in‐depth case studies of innovative partnership projects between B&O and some of its sub‐suppliers.

[1]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[2]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[3]  A. Cox.  Relational competence and strategic procurement management Towards an entrepreneurial and contractual theory of the firm , 1996 .

[4]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[6]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[8]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[9]  James G. Combs,et al.  Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics , 1999 .

[10]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[11]  L. Ellram,et al.  A Portfolio Approach to Supplier-Relationships , 1997 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[13]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[14]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[15]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[16]  John Johansen,et al.  Supplier Segmentation in Theory and Practice - Towards a Competence Perspective , 2000 .

[17]  M. Bensaou.  Portfolios of Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 1999 .

[18]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[19]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[20]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[21]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[22]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments? , 1999 .