Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments

This paper presents results that demonstrate functional similarities in subjects' access to spatial knowledge (or spatial representation) between real and virtual environments. Such representations are important components of the transfer of reasoning ability and knowledge between these two environments. In particular, we present two experiments aimed at investigating similarities in spatial knowledge derived from exploring on foot both physical environments and virtual environments presented through a head-mounted display. In the first experiment, subjects were asked to learn the locations of target objects in the real or virtual environment and then rotate the perspective by either physically locomoting to a new facing direction or imagining moving. The latencies and errors were generally worse after imagining locomoting and for greater degrees of rotation in perspective; they did not differ significantly across knowledge derived from exploring the physical versus virtual environments. In the second experiment, subjects were asked to imagine simple rotations versus simple translations in perspective. The errors and latencies indicated that the to-be-imagined disparity was linearly related after learning the physical and virtual environment. These results demonstrate functional similarities in access to knowledge of new perspective when it is learned by exploring physical environments and virtual renderings of the same environment.

[1]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  M Behrmann,et al.  Active control of locomotion facilitates nonvisual navigation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information , 2004, Nature.

[5]  J. Rieser Access to Knowledge of Spatial Structure at Novel Points of Observation , 1989 .

[6]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual cues can be sufficient for triggering automatic, reflexlike spatial updating , 2005, TAP.

[7]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[8]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[9]  F. E. Satterthwaite Synthesis of variance , 1941 .

[10]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Jodie M Plumert,et al.  Children's perception of gap affordances: bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in an immersive virtual environment. , 2004, Child development.

[12]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration , 1998, Presence.

[13]  Joseph Psotka,et al.  Effects of Field of View on Judgments of Self-Location: Distortions in Distance Estimations Even When the Image Geometry Exactly Fits the Field of View , 1998, Presence.

[14]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Spatial updating of virtual displays , 2004 .

[15]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning , 2000 .

[16]  Maryjane Wraga,et al.  Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[18]  Andrew C. Beall,et al.  Three dimensional spatial memory and learning in real and virtual environments , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[19]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Spatial updating of virtual displays during self- and display rotation. , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Bruce A. Kay,et al.  Coupling of posture and gait: mode locking and parametric excitation , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment , 2007, TAP.

[22]  Jodie M. Plumert,et al.  Distance perception in real and virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[23]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[24]  M. May,et al.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[26]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: it's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. , 1994, Child development.

[28]  F. E. Satterthwaite An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946, Biometrics.

[29]  J. Rieser,et al.  Sensitivity to Perspective Structure While Walking without Vision , 1986, Perception.

[30]  Wallace J. Sadowski,et al.  Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[31]  J. Loomis,et al.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  Martin J. Farrell,et al.  Mental Rotation and the Automatic Updating of Body-Centered Spatial Relationships , 1998 .

[33]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  Visual motion influences locomotion in a treadmill virtual environment , 2004, APGV '04.

[34]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Beyond imagination: Perspective change problems revisited , 2005 .

[35]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[36]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[37]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Using virtual environments to assess directional knowledge , 2004 .

[38]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[39]  RieserJohn,et al.  Functional similarities in spatial representations between real and virtual environments , 2007 .

[40]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.

[42]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Changing perspective within and across environments , 2003, Cognition.

[43]  B. Mohler,et al.  Calibration of Locomotion due to Visual Motion in a Treadmill-based Virtual Environment , 2005 .