Spatial Calibration and Temporal Validation of Flow for Regional Scale Hydrologic Modeling 1

Abstract:  Physically based regional scale hydrologic modeling is gaining importance for planning and management of water resources. Calibration and validation of such regional scale model is necessary before applying it for scenario assessment. However, in most regional scale hydrologic modeling, flow validation is performed at the river basin outlet without accounting for spatial variations in hydrological parameters within the subunits. In this study, we calibrated the model to capture the spatial variations in runoff at subwatershed level to assure local water balance, and validated the streamflow at key gaging stations along the river to assure temporal variability. Ohio and Arkansas-White-Red River Basins of the United States were modeled using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for the period from 1961 to 1990. R2 values of average annual runoff at subwatersheds were 0.78 and 0.99 for the Ohio and Arkansas Basins. Observed and simulated annual and monthly streamflow from 1961 to 1990 is used for temporal validation at the gages. R2 values estimated were greater than 0.6. In summary, spatially distributed calibration at subwatersheds and temporal validation at the stream gages accounted for the spatial and temporal hydrological patterns reasonably well in the two river basins. This study highlights the importance of spatially distributed calibration and validation in large river basins.

[1]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[2]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Regional estimation of base flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin , 2000 .

[3]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  GIS-BASED HYDROLOGIC MODELING IN THE SANDUSKY WATERSHED USING SWAT , 2005 .

[4]  Limin Yang,et al.  COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCES , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behaviour with different evapotranspiration methods , 2008 .

[6]  Henry F. Diaz,et al.  Creating a Serially Complete, National Daily Time Series of Temperature and Precipitation for the Western United States , 2000 .

[7]  Jay D. Atwood,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of APEX for national assessment , 2006 .

[8]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[9]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE 1 , 1999 .

[10]  R. Allen,et al.  History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation , 2003 .

[11]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Development of an automated procedure for estimation of the spatial variation of runoff in large river basins , 2008 .

[12]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[13]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[15]  J. Eischeid,et al.  Constructing Retrospective Gridded Daily Precipitation and Temperature Datasets for the Conterminous United States , 2008 .

[16]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Hydrologic Modelling of the United States with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool , 1998 .

[17]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature , 1985 .

[18]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Agricultural Benefits for Senegal River Basin , 1985 .

[19]  J. Arnold,et al.  An Approach for Estimating Water Quality Benefits of Conservation Practices at the National Level , 2005 .

[20]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Explaining spatial variability in mean annual runoff in the conterminous United States , 1999 .

[21]  Zhi-feng Yang,et al.  A distributed non-point source pollution model: calibration and validation in the Yellow River Basin. , 2004, Journal of environmental sciences.

[22]  Deva K. Borah,et al.  WATERSHED-SCALE HYDROLOGIC AND NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION MODELS: REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2004 .

[23]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[24]  C. Daly,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate , 2002 .

[25]  M. Jha,et al.  CLIMATE CHHANGE SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT ON UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN STREAMFLOWS USING SWAT 1 , 2006 .