Chromosomal position effects are linked to sir2-mediated variation in transcriptional burst size.

Gene expression noise varies with genomic position and is a driving force in the evolution of chromosome organization. Nevertheless, position effects remain poorly characterized. Here, we present a systematic analysis of chromosomal position effects by characterizing single-cell gene expression from euchromatic positions spanning the length of a eukaryotic chromosome. We demonstrate that position affects gene expression by modulating the size of transcriptional bursts, rather than their frequency, and that the histone deacetylase Sir2 plays a role in this process across the chromosome.

[1]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[2]  L. Hurst,et al.  Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[3]  Subhajyoti De,et al.  Genomic neighbourhood and the regulation of gene expression. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[4]  János Z. Kelemen,et al.  Spatial Epigenetic Control of Mono- and Bistable Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS biology.

[5]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[6]  T. Hughes,et al.  Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Silver,et al.  Communication between levels of transcriptional control improves robustness and adaptivity , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[8]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Differential Requirement of SAGA Components for Recruitment of TATA-Box-Binding Protein to Promoters In Vivo , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  B. Cairns.  The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters , 2009, Nature.

[10]  Benjamin B. Kaufmann,et al.  Contributions of low molecule number and chromosomal positioning to stochastic gene expression , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  HIV Promoter Integration Site Primarily Modulates Transcriptional Burst Size Rather Than Frequency , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  L. Guarente,et al.  Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase , 2000, Nature.

[14]  D. S. Gross,et al.  Sir2 Silences Gene Transcription by Targeting the Transition between RNA Polymerase II Initiation and Elongation , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[16]  N. Friedman,et al.  Single-Nucleosome Mapping of Histone Modifications in S. cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS biology.

[17]  U. Oechsner,et al.  Reb1p-dependent DNA Bending Effects Nucleosome Positioning and Constitutive Transcription at the Yeast Profilin Promoter* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  M. L. Simpson,et al.  Transcriptional bursting from the HIV-1 promoter is a significant source of stochastic noise in HIV-1 gene expression. , 2010, Biophysical journal.