The acidic tumor microenvironment: a target for smart cancer nano-theranostics

The acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), which mainly results from the high glycolytic rate of tumor cells, has been characterized as a hallmark of solid tumors and found to be a pivotal factor participating in tumor progression. Recently, due to the increasing understanding of the acidic TME, it has been shown that the acidic TME could be utilized as a multifaceted target during the design of various pH-responsive nanoscale theranostic platforms for the precise diagnosis and effective treatment of cancers. In this article, we will give a focused overview on the latest progress in utilizing this characteristic acidic TME as the target of nano-theranostics to enable cancer-specific imaging and therapy. The future perspectives in the development of acidic TME-targeting nanomedicine strategies will be discussed afterwards.

[1]  Yang Li,et al.  Investigation of endosome and lysosome biology by ultra pH‐sensitive nanoprobes☆ , 2017, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[2]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Nanoscale‐Coordination‐Polymer‐Shelled Manganese Dioxide Composite Nanoparticles: A Multistage Redox/pH/H2O2‐Responsive Cancer Theranostic Nanoplatform , 2017 .

[3]  Dalong Ni,et al.  Magnesium silicide nanoparticles as a deoxygenation agent for cancer starvation therapy. , 2017, Nature nanotechnology.

[4]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities , 2016, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  F. Danhier,et al.  To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine? , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  Baran D. Sumer,et al.  A Transistor-like pH Nanoprobe for Tumour Detection and Image-guided Surgery , 2016, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Liangzhu Feng,et al.  CaCO3 nanoparticles as an ultra-sensitive tumor-pH-responsive nanoplatform enabling real-time drug release monitoring and cancer combination therapy. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[8]  C. Lo,et al.  Tumor Microenvironment-Responsive Nanoparticle Delivery of Chemotherapy for Enhanced Selective Cellular Uptake and Transportation within Tumor. , 2016, Biomacromolecules.

[9]  Jinming Gao,et al.  Molecular basis of cooperativity in pH-triggered supramolecular self-assembly , 2016, Nature Communications.

[10]  Liangzhu Feng,et al.  Intelligent Albumin–MnO2 Nanoparticles as pH‐/H2O2‐Responsive Dissociable Nanocarriers to Modulate Tumor Hypoxia for Effective Combination Therapy , 2016, Advanced materials.

[11]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  Hierarchical Targeting Strategy for Enhanced Tumor Tissue Accumulation/Retention and Cellular Internalization , 2016, Advanced materials.

[12]  Jianfeng Zeng,et al.  Albumin-NIR dye self-assembled nanoparticles for photoacoustic pH imaging and pH-responsive photothermal therapy effective for large tumors. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[13]  I. Aoki,et al.  A pH-activatable nanoparticle with signal-amplification capabilities for non-invasive imaging of tumour malignancy. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Modulation of Hypoxia in Solid Tumor Microenvironment with MnO2 Nanoparticles to Enhance Photodynamic Therapy , 2016 .

[15]  Sarah E Bohndiek,et al.  Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging , 2016, Nature Methods.

[16]  Yanli Zhao,et al.  Dual-Responsive Carbon Dots for Tumor Extracellular Microenvironment Triggered Targeting and Enhanced Anticancer Drug Delivery. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[17]  D. Engelman,et al.  Probe for the measurement of cell surface pH in vivo and ex vivo , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Chen Zhang,et al.  A Polyoxometalate Cluster Paradigm with Self-Adaptive Electronic Structure for Acidity/Reducibility-Specific Photothermal Conversion. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Yiting Xu,et al.  A Simple Dual-pH Responsive Prodrug-Based Polymeric Micelles for Drug Delivery. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[20]  Jun Wang,et al.  Smart Superstructures with Ultrahigh pH-Sensitivity for Targeting Acidic Tumor Microenvironment: Instantaneous Size Switching and Improved Tumor Penetration. , 2016, ACS nano.

[21]  Xian‐Zheng Zhang,et al.  Acidity‐Triggered Tumor‐Targeted Chimeric Peptide for Enhanced Intra‐Nuclear Photodynamic Therapy , 2016 .

[22]  Zhen Gu,et al.  Tumor microenvironment and intracellular signal-activated nanomaterials for anticancer drug delivery , 2016 .

[23]  Joseph W. Nichols,et al.  Vascular bursts enhance permeability of tumour blood vessels and improve nanoparticle delivery. , 2016, Nature nanotechnology.

[24]  Zhigui Su,et al.  Co-delivery of erlotinib and doxorubicin by pH-sensitive charge conversion nanocarrier for synergistic therapy. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[25]  Dan Ding,et al.  Semiconducting Oligomer Nanoparticles as an Activatable Photoacoustic Probe with Amplified Brightness for In Vivo Imaging of pH , 2016, Advanced materials.

[26]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Cisplatin‐Prodrug‐Constructed Liposomes as a Versatile Theranostic Nanoplatform for Bimodal Imaging Guided Combination Cancer Therapy , 2016 .

[27]  William R Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms and biomaterials in pH-responsive tumour targeted drug delivery: A review. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[28]  Jun Wang,et al.  Stimuli-responsive clustered nanoparticles for improved tumor penetration and therapeutic efficacy , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Yanli Zhao,et al.  Charge-Convertible Carbon Dots for Imaging-Guided Drug Delivery with Enhanced in Vivo Cancer Therapeutic Efficiency. , 2016, ACS nano.

[30]  Zibo Li,et al.  Red Blood Cell‐Facilitated Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Treatment , 2016, Advanced functional materials.

[31]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  Stimuli-Responsive Programmed Specific Targeting in Nanomedicine. , 2016, ACS nano.

[32]  Heliang Yao,et al.  Synthesis of Iron Nanometallic Glasses and Their Application in Cancer Therapy by a Localized Fenton Reaction. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[33]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Tumor-specific pH-responsive peptide-modified pH-sensitive liposomes containing doxorubicin for enhancing glioma targeting and anti-tumor activity. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[34]  Ting Liu,et al.  Bioconjugated Manganese Dioxide Nanoparticles Enhance Chemotherapy Response by Priming Tumor-Associated Macrophages toward M1-like Phenotype and Attenuating Tumor Hypoxia. , 2016, ACS nano.

[35]  Chen-Sheng Yeh,et al.  Ultrasound-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated Therapy and Imaging Using a Fenton Reaction Activable Polymersome. , 2016, ACS nano.

[36]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Facile Generation of Tumor-pH-Labile Linkage-Bridged Block Copolymers for Chemotherapeutic Delivery. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[37]  E. Wagner,et al.  pH-Reversible Cationic RNase A Conjugates for Enhanced Cellular Delivery and Tumor Cell Killing. , 2016, Biomacromolecules.

[38]  Lucas A Lane,et al.  Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles for targeting the tumor microenvironment. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[39]  Song Shen,et al.  Tumor Acidity-Sensitive Polymeric Vector for Active Targeted siRNA Delivery. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  Jianfeng Zeng,et al.  A Self‐Assembled Albumin‐Based Nanoprobe for In Vivo Ratiometric Photoacoustic pH Imaging , 2015, Advanced materials.

[41]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Two-dimensional magnetic WS2@Fe3O4 nanocomposite with mesoporous silica coating for drug delivery and imaging-guided therapy of cancer. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[43]  Jianbin Tang,et al.  The Role of Micelle Size in Tumor Accumulation, Penetration, and Treatment. , 2015, ACS nano.

[44]  Qingqing Yang,et al.  Multistage Nanovehicle Delivery System Based on Stepwise Size Reduction and Charge Reversal for Programmed Nuclear Targeting of Systemically Administered Anticancer Drugs , 2015 .

[45]  Xiaohan Liu,et al.  Iron oxide/manganese oxide co-loaded hybrid nanogels as pH-responsive magnetic resonance contrast agents. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[46]  J. R. Corrêa,et al.  Benzothiadiazole Derivatives as Fluorescence Imaging Probes: Beyond Classical Scaffolds. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[47]  S. Konishi,et al.  Systemic Targeting of Lymph Node Metastasis through the Blood Vascular System by Using Size-Controlled Nanocarriers. , 2015, ACS nano.

[48]  Florian Klemm,et al.  Microenvironmental regulation of therapeutic response in cancer. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[49]  W. Mark Saltzman,et al.  A holistic approach to targeting disease with polymeric nanoparticles , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[50]  Kai Yang,et al.  The advancing uses of nano-graphene in drug delivery , 2015, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[51]  H. Kuh,et al.  Improving drug delivery to solid tumors: priming the tumor microenvironment. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[52]  Jörg Huwyler,et al.  Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[53]  Xing Ma,et al.  A preloaded amorphous calcium carbonate/doxorubicin@silica nanoreactor for pH-responsive delivery of an anticancer drug. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[54]  Yong Wang,et al.  A Reduction and pH Dual‐Sensitive Polymeric Vector for Long‐Circulating and Tumor‐Targeted siRNA Delivery , 2014, Advanced materials.

[55]  Youqing Shen,et al.  Integration of Nanoassembly Functions for an Effective Delivery Cascade for Cancer Drugs , 2014, Advanced materials.

[56]  Lianzhou Wang,et al.  Break‐up of Two‐Dimensional MnO2 Nanosheets Promotes Ultrasensitive pH‐Triggered Theranostics of Cancer , 2014, Advanced materials.

[57]  V. Torchilin.  Multifunctional, stimuli-sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[58]  Efstathios Karathanasis,et al.  Targeted nanotechnology for cancer imaging. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[59]  Liang Cheng,et al.  Functional nanomaterials for phototherapies of cancer. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[60]  Liangzhu Feng,et al.  Smart pH‐Responsive Nanocarriers Based on Nano‐Graphene Oxide for Combined Chemo‐ and Photothermal Therapy Overcoming Drug Resistance , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[61]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Tumor extracellular acidity-activated nanoparticles as drug delivery systems for enhanced cancer therapy. , 2014, Biotechnology advances.

[62]  Q. Ping,et al.  Sequential intra-intercellular nanoparticle delivery system for deep tumor penetration. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[63]  Taeghwan Hyeon,et al.  Multifunctional tumor pH-sensitive self-assembled nanoparticles for bimodal imaging and treatment of resistant heterogeneous tumors. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[64]  Travis M. Shaffer,et al.  Environment-responsive Nanophores for Therapy and Treatment Monitoring via Molecular MRI Quenching , 2014, Nature Communications.

[65]  Gang Liu,et al.  PEGylated WS2 Nanosheets as a Multifunctional Theranostic Agent for in vivo Dual‐Modal CT/Photoacoustic Imaging Guided Photothermal Therapy , 2014, Advanced materials.

[66]  Kit S Lam,et al.  Stimuli-responsive cross-linked micelles for on-demand drug delivery against cancers. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[67]  Juyoung Yoon,et al.  Recent progress in the development of near-infrared fluorescent probes for bioimaging applications. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[68]  Baran D. Sumer,et al.  A Broad Nanoparticle-Based Strategy for Tumor Imaging by Nonlinear Amplification of Microenvironment Signals , 2013, Nature materials.

[69]  Y. Bae,et al.  A cancer-recognizable MRI contrast agents using pH-responsive polymeric micelle. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[70]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Ultra‐Small Iron Oxide Doped Polypyrrole Nanoparticles for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging Guided Photothermal Therapy , 2014 .

[71]  Dean Ho,et al.  Cancer Nanomedicine: From Drug Delivery to Imaging , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[72]  Patrick Couvreur,et al.  Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. , 2013, Nature materials.

[73]  M. Junttila,et al.  Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response , 2013, Nature.

[74]  Zhishen Ge,et al.  Functional block copolymer assemblies responsive to tumor and intracellular microenvironments for site-specific drug delivery and enhanced imaging performance. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[75]  J. Ji,et al.  Enhanced retention and cellular uptake of nanoparticles in tumors by controlling their aggregation behavior. , 2013, ACS nano.

[76]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Imaging‐Guided pH‐Sensitive Photodynamic Therapy Using Charge Reversible Upconversion Nanoparticles under Near‐Infrared Light , 2013 .

[77]  Lei Xing,et al.  Coordination bonding based pH-responsive drug delivery systems , 2013 .

[78]  Min Jin,et al.  pH-responsive assembly of gold nanoparticles and "spatiotemporally concerted" drug release for synergistic cancer therapy. , 2013, ACS nano.

[79]  Jun Wang,et al.  Surface Charge Switchable Nanoparticles Based on Zwitterionic Polymer for Enhanced Drug Delivery to Tumor , 2012, Advanced materials.

[80]  Yang Sun,et al.  Manganese oxide-based multifunctionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for pH-responsive MRI, ultrasonography and circumvention of MDR in cancer cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[81]  Jing Qin,et al.  Multifunctional drug delivery system for targeting tumor and its acidic microenvironment. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[82]  Warren C W Chan,et al.  The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[83]  E. Wagner,et al.  Acid-labile traceless click linker for protein transduction. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[84]  Jinming Gao,et al.  Multicolored pH-tunable and activatable fluorescence nanoplatform responsive to physiologic pH stimuli. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[85]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[86]  Ick Chan Kwon,et al.  Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis. , 2012, Chemical Society reviews.

[87]  R. Langer,et al.  Photoswitchable Nanoparticles for Triggered Tissue Penetration and Drug Delivery , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[88]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Sheddable ternary nanoparticles for tumor acidity-targeted siRNA delivery. , 2012, ACS nano.

[89]  E M Sevick-Muraca,et al.  Translation of near-infrared fluorescence imaging technologies: emerging clinical applications. , 2012, Annual review of medicine.

[90]  M. Uesaka,et al.  Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[91]  Yong-Min Huh,et al.  Urchin-shaped manganese oxide nanoparticles as pH-responsive activatable T1 contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[92]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer-doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[93]  Jae Won Lee,et al.  pH-responsive polymeric micelle based on PEG-poly(β-amino ester)/(amido amine) as intelligent vehicle for magnetic resonance imaging in detection of cerebral ischemic area. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[94]  Erlong Zhang,et al.  A review of NIR dyes in cancer targeting and imaging. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[95]  Claudiu T. Supuran,et al.  Interfering with pH regulation in tumours as a therapeutic strategy , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[96]  H. Möhwald,et al.  Stimuli-responsive LbL capsules and nanoshells for drug delivery. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[97]  Kit S Lam,et al.  The effect of surface charge on in vivo biodistribution of PEG-oligocholic acid based micellar nanoparticles. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[98]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in cancer detection, diagnosis, and treatment guidance. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[99]  T. Mak,et al.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[100]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Multistage nanoparticle delivery system for deep penetration into tumor tissue , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  Yaping Li,et al.  In vivo biodistribution and urinary excretion of mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effects of particle size and PEGylation. , 2011, Small.

[102]  Véronique Préat,et al.  To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[103]  Daniela Thorwarth,et al.  Physical radiotherapy treatment planning based on functional PET/CT data. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[104]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  Tumor pH and Its Measurement , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[105]  Hyesung Jeon,et al.  Magnetite-nanoparticle-encapsulated pH-responsive polymeric micelle as an MRI probe for detecting acidic pathologic areas. , 2010, Small.

[106]  Eva M. Sevick-Muraca,et al.  Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in Humans with Indocyanine Green: A Review and Update~!2009-12-07~!2009-12-23~!2010-05-26~! , 2010 .

[107]  P. Fortina,et al.  Loss of stromal caveolin-1 leads to oxidative stress, mimics hypoxia and drives inflammation in the tumor microenvironment, conferring the “reverse Warburg effect”: A transcriptional informatics analysis with validation , 2010, Cell cycle.

[108]  P. Choyke,et al.  New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[109]  Jin-Zhi Du,et al.  A tumor-acidity-activated charge-conversional nanogel as an intelligent vehicle for promoted tumoral-cell uptake and drug delivery. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[110]  Cui Tang,et al.  Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[111]  Scott C Davis,et al.  Pre-clinical whole-body fluorescence imaging: Review of instruments, methods and applications. , 2010, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[112]  I-Chih Tan,et al.  Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in Humans with Indocyanine Green: A Review and Update. , 2010, Open surgical oncology journal.

[113]  Xueding Wang,et al.  Picomolar sensitivity MRI and photoacoustic imaging of cobalt nanoparticles , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[114]  T. Whiteside.  The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth , 2008, Oncogene.

[115]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Cancer Cell Metabolism: Warburg and Beyond , 2008, Cell.

[116]  Zhuang Liu,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[117]  Jerry S. H. Lee,et al.  Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[118]  S. Ganta,et al.  A review of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[119]  Sung Tae Kim,et al.  Development of a T1 contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging using MnO nanoparticles. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[120]  D. Schmaljohann.  Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[121]  Chi V Dang,et al.  Cancer's molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. , 2006, Cancer research.

[122]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2006 .

[123]  R. Tsien,et al.  The Fluorescent Toolbox for Assessing Protein Location and Function , 2006, Science.

[124]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  Dependence of FDG uptake on tumor microenvironment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[125]  Y. Mizushima,et al.  Drug-incorporating calcium carbonate nanoparticles for a new delivery system. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[126]  R. Jain.  Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[127]  Rameen Beroukhim,et al.  Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[128]  Atsushi Harada,et al.  Design of environment-sensitive supramolecular assemblies for intracellular drug delivery: polymeric micelles that are responsive to intracellular pH change. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[129]  J. Frangioni.  In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[130]  M. Dellian,et al.  Effect of the surface charge of liposomes on their uptake by angiogenic tumor vessels , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[131]  David A. Cheresh,et al.  Detection of tumor angiogenesis in vivo by αvβ3-targeted magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[132]  R Weissleder,et al.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide: clinical application as a contrast agent for MR imaging of the liver. , 1988, Radiology.