Inquiry‐and‐intervention in systems planning: Probing methodological rationalities

Inquiry and intervention towards improving systems planning are argued in this paper to be inseparable features of the same process. The formula “comprehension=application” is explored to evoke possibilities for inquiry‐and‐intervention which transcend the confines of any given theory‐practice cycle. It is suggested that the partiality of a uni‐theoretical response may be replaced by judgements grounded in discursive accountability. This is not tantamount to validation through respect for “the evidence” of practice (for this still may be caught up in the same cycle); nor is it tantamount to consensual validation (for judgements do not always rest on agreements—indeed agreement as a form of social planning may itself become stifling of diversity and choice). A notion of discursive accountability is outlined in this paper and it is proposed that systems planning becomes enriched insofar as knowledge‐judgements are seen to rest on processes of discursive accountability.

[1]  Jean-François Lyotard,et al.  The Postmodern Condition , 1979 .

[2]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[3]  R. Brown Social science as civic discourse , 1989 .

[4]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Testament to conversations on critical systems thinking between two systems practitioners , 1990 .

[5]  S. Beer The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[6]  R. Fuenmayor Truth and openness: an epistemology for interpretive systemology , 1991 .

[7]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Total Systems Intervention (TSI): A Reconstitution , 1995 .

[8]  J. R. Beaumont Diagnosing the System for Organizations , 1985 .

[9]  Leroy White,et al.  After OR: An Agenda for Postmodernism and Poststructuralism in OR , 1993 .

[10]  Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu Tracking the development of the Emery-Trist systems paradigm (ETSP) , 1992 .

[11]  R. Fuenmayor,et al.  The scene for Interpretive Systemology , 1991 .

[12]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .

[13]  J. Mingers Subjectivism and Soft Systems Methodology - A Critique , 1984 .

[14]  A. Gouldner The dialectic of ideology and technology , 1976 .

[15]  N. Romm The Methodologies of Positivism and Marxism , 1991 .

[16]  Stafford Beer,et al.  The Viable System Model : its provenance , development , methodology and pathology * Stafford Beer = President of the World Organization for Systems and Cybernetics , 2000 .

[17]  Stafford Beer,et al.  World in Torment: A Time Whose Idea Must Come , 1993 .

[18]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[19]  Norma R. A. Romm,et al.  Some Anomalies in Ulrich’s Critical Inquiry and Problem-Solving Approach , 1995 .

[20]  Peter Checkland Systems and Scholarship: The Need to Do Better , 1992 .

[21]  R. Flood,et al.  Diversity management: Theory in action , 1995 .

[22]  Norma R. A. Romm,et al.  Knowing as intervention: Reflections on the application of systems ideas , 1995 .

[23]  John Mingers,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy , 1983 .

[24]  Ann Taket,et al.  Undercover Agency?–Ethics, Responsibility and the Practice of OR , 1994 .

[25]  John Hassard,et al.  Sociology and Organization Theory: Positivism, Paradigms and Postmodernity , 1993 .