Construct validity of the DynaPort KneeTest: a comparison with observations of physical therapists.

OBJECTIVE To assess the construct validity of the DynaPort KneeTest (KneeTest), which is a performance-based test to assess functioning of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Scores on the KneeTest (KneeScore) were compared with observations of physical therapists of the patients' functional disability. The reliability of these observations was also assessed. METHOD Twelve physical therapists received identical video tapes showing the performance of 33 patients on the KneeTest. Each physical therapist rated the functional disability of each patient, performing the 23 activities of the KneeTest, on 23 Visual Analogue Scales (VAS(activity)). The 23 VAS(activity) scores were averaged into a VAS(average) score. At the end of the test, an overall rating for the general performance of the patient was given on a VAS(overall). Inter-observer Reliability was assessed for the VAS(activity) scores, VAS(average), and the VAS(overall). RESULTS Inter-observer reliability of the VAS(average) was higher (ICC 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.92) than the VAS(overall) (ICC 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.77). The correlation between the KneeScore and the VAS(average), averaged over the 12 physiotherapists, was 0.86. CONCLUSION The construct validity of the KneeTest was supported by the strong correlation with the ratings of the patients' disability by physical therapists. Given these findings and the high test-retest reliability of the KneeTest that was found in our previous study, we conclude that the KneeTest is a valid measure for assessing functioning in orthopedic and physical therapy research in patients with knee-OA before and after total knee replacement. Longitudinal validity has to be evaluated yet.

[1]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[2]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[3]  M Fransen,et al.  Reliability of gait measurements in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[4]  E. Y. Chao,et al.  Biomechanical gait evaluation of pre and postoperative total knee replacement patients , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.

[5]  W. Ettinger,et al.  Assessing performance-related disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  R. V. van Lummel,et al.  A correlation study of objective functionality and WOMAC in total knee arthroplasty , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  K N Lohr,et al.  Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. , 1996, Clinical therapeutics.

[8]  Rienk M A van der Slikke,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of the DynaPort KneeTest. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  R. Bourne,et al.  What Is the Best Way of Assessing Outcome After Total Knee Replacement? , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[11]  L G Branch,et al.  Physical performance measures in aging research. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[12]  Hélène Moffet,et al.  Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  R. Shields,et al.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. , 1995, Physical therapy.

[14]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Oostendorp,et al.  Internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. , 1999, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[16]  P. Stratford,et al.  Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  R. Davey,et al.  Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis , 2001, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[18]  J. V. van Dieën,et al.  Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.