Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking

The microstructure of the nucleus, one of the most studied but least understood cellular organelles, is the subject of much debate. Through the use of particle nanotracking, we detect and quantify the micro-organization as well as the viscoelastic properties of the intranuclear region in single, live, interphase somatic cells. We find that the intranuclear region is much stiffer than the cytoplasm; it is also more elastic than viscous, which reveals that the intranuclear region displays an unexpectedly strong solid-like behavior. The mean shear viscosity and elasticity of the intranuclear region of Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts are 520 Poise (P) and 180 dyn/cm2, respectively. These measurements determine a lower bound of the propulsive forces (3-15 picoNewton) required for nuclear organelles such as promyelocytic-leukemia bodies to undergo processive transport within the nucleus by overcoming friction forces set by the intranuclear viscosity. Dynamic analysis of the spontaneous movements of nanospheres embedded in the nucleus reveals the presence of putative transient nuclear microdomains of mean size 290±50 nm, which are mostly absent in the cytoplasm. The strong elastic character and micro-organization of the intranuclear region revealed by particle nanotracking analysis may help the nucleus to preserve its structural coherence. These studies also highlight the difference between the low interstitial nucleoplasmic viscosity, which controls the transport of nuclear proteins and molecules, and the much higher mesoscale viscosity, which affects the diffusion and directed transport of nuclear organelles and re-organization of interphase chromosomes.

[1]  A. Lamond,et al.  Structure and function in the nucleus. , 1998, Science.

[2]  S. Paddock,et al.  Distribution of microfilament bundles during rotation of the nucleus in 3T3 cells treated with monensin. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[3]  A. Verkman,et al.  Translational Diffusion of Macromolecule-sized Solutes in Cytoplasm and Nucleus , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  A Kusumi,et al.  Cell surface organization by the membrane skeleton. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[5]  R. Eils,et al.  Metabolic-energy-dependent movement of PML bodies within the mammalian cell nucleus , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  D. Wirtz,et al.  A mechanism of coupling RCC1 mobility to RanGTP production on the chromatin in vivo , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Pier Paolo Pandolfi,et al.  The transcriptional role of PML and the nuclear body , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[9]  D. Wirtz,et al.  The mechanical properties of simple epithelial keratins 8 and 18: discriminating between interfacial and bulk elasticities. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[10]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Linear viscoelastic moduli of concentrated DNA solutions , 1998 .

[11]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  A myosin I isoform in the nucleus. , 2000, Science.

[12]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  A. Murray,et al.  Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells , 1997, Current Biology.

[14]  T. Pederson Diffusional protein transport within the nucleus: a message in the medium , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[16]  C Cremer,et al.  Morphology and dynamics of chromosome territories in living cells. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  J. Gall,et al.  Cajal bodies: the first 100 years. , 2000, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[18]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids , 1997 .

[19]  Justin E. Molloy,et al.  The motor protein myosin-I produces its working stroke in two steps , 1999, Nature.

[20]  E. Fedorov,et al.  Multiple-particle tracking measurements of heterogeneities in solutions of actin filaments and actin bundles. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[22]  G. Albrecht-Buehler,et al.  The degree of coupling of nuclear rotation in binucleate 3T3 cells. , 1986, Experimental cell research.

[23]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Effect of length, topology, and concentration on the microviscosity and microheterogeneity of DNA solutions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  S. Gasser,et al.  Visualizing Chromatin Dynamics in Interphase Nuclei , 2002, Science.

[25]  Susan M. Kilroy,et al.  Signal recognition particle components in the nucleolus. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Mechanics and multiple-particle tracking microheterogeneity of alpha-actinin-cross-linked actin filament networks. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[27]  M. Huggins Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. , 1961 .

[28]  D. E. Wolf,et al.  Intranuclear diffusion and hybridization state of oligonucleotides measured by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy in living cells. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Efficient active transport of gene nanocarriers to the cell nucleus , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. Taylor,et al.  Probing the structure of cytoplasm , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  John W. Sedat,et al.  Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus , 2001, Current Biology.

[32]  A S Verkman,et al.  Size-dependent DNA Mobility in Cytoplasm and Nucleus* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  R. Singer,et al.  Movement of nuclear poly(A) RNA throughout the interchromatin space in living cells , 1999, Current Biology.

[34]  H. Kowarzyk Structure and Function. , 1910, Nature.

[35]  T. Pederson Dynamics and genome-centricity of interchromatin domains in the nucleus , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  Jason R. Swedlow,et al.  Cajal Body dynamics and association with chromatin are ATP-dependent , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[37]  T. Cremer,et al.  Quantitative motion analysis of subchromosomal foci in living cells using four-dimensional microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[38]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Studying protein dynamics in living cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  Philip LeDuc,et al.  Dynamics of individual flexible polymers in a shear flow , 1999, Nature.

[40]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Kinetic modelling approaches to in vivo imaging , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  P. Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[42]  A. Palmer,et al.  Diffusing wave spectroscopy microrheology of actin filament networks. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[43]  M. Carmo-Fonseca The Contribution of Nuclear Compartmentalization to Gene Regulation , 2002, Cell.

[44]  T. Misteli The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[46]  J. Nickerson,et al.  Experimental observations of a nuclear matrix. , 2001, Journal of cell science.