Mixing Oil with Water: How to Effectively Teach Design Science in Management Education?

The methodology of design science (DS) has been emerging as a new form of engaged scholarship in which key managerial and organizational challenges are addressed and solved. These developments have major implications for management education, which has been repeatedly criticized for its lack of relevance to practitioners. However, design science methodology and its implications for management education are still unclear and disputed. Teaching and learning DS thus often suffers from the lack of a consistent methodology. In this respect, teaching DS is very much like mixing oil with water. The purpose of this paper is to compare various taxonomies for DS methodology proposed in the management literature and then develop a consistent taxonomy and integrative framework that may appeal to management students at undergraduate and graduate levels. The proposed framework for DS involves an iterative cycle of exploration, synthesis, creation and evaluation. Design principles arise from, but also connect and inform, these four steps in DS.

[1]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[2]  Hans Berends,et al.  Problem Solving in Organizations: A Methodological Handbook for Business and Management Students , 2012 .

[3]  Jon Kolko,et al.  Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis , 2010, Design Issues.

[4]  Riccardo Bonazzi,et al.  Talk Before It's Too Late: Reconsidering the Role of Conversation in Information Systems Project Management , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  S. Cassels Design in business , 1990 .

[6]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar , 2009, ECIS.

[7]  Andreas Birnik,et al.  Marketing Mix Standardization in Multinational Corporations: A Review of the Evidence , 2007 .

[8]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I , 2011 .

[9]  A. Romme,et al.  Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework , 2018, Journal of Business Venturing Insights.

[10]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[11]  Roman Beck,et al.  Theory-generating design science research , 2013, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[12]  David Dunne,et al.  Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion , 2006 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Design Research in Informatics , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel Pacheco Lacerda,et al.  Design Science Research: A Method for Science and Technology Advancement , 2014 .

[16]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Design Matters for Management , 2010 .

[17]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[18]  J. Aken Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[19]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Construction Principles and Design Rules in the Case of Circular Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[20]  Gerard P. Hodgkinson,et al.  Toward a (Pragmatic) Science of Strategic Intervention: Design Propositions for Scenario Planning , 2008 .

[21]  M. Hellström,et al.  Collaboration mechanisms for business models in distributed energy ecosystems , 2015 .

[22]  Georges Romme,et al.  Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies , 2009 .

[23]  Kari Jussila,et al.  Making decisions on offshore outsourcing and backshoring: A case study in the bicycle industry , 2015 .

[24]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Designing and Testing an OD Intervention , 2007 .

[25]  Georges Romme,et al.  The Quest for Professionalism: The Case of Management and Entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[26]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[27]  Jan Holmström,et al.  The uses of tracking in operations management: Synthesis of a research program , 2010 .

[28]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Design Problems and Design Paradoxes , 2006, Design Issues.

[29]  Ville Hinkka,et al.  RFID tracking implementation model for the technical trade and construction supply chains , 2013 .

[30]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[31]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Developing actionable knowledge on value crafting: a design science approach , 2016 .

[32]  Cannon Dj The National Health Service in England. , 1949 .

[33]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[34]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[35]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Idealized design: Creative corporate visioning , 1993 .

[36]  Richard K. Johnson Open Access , 2005 .

[37]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .

[38]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[39]  Roger L. M. Dunbar,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Learning to Design Organizations and Learning from Designing Them , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Towards Design Theory and expandable rationality : The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. 1 , 2003 .

[41]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  The Two Pillars of New Management Research , 2001 .

[44]  Nitin Nohria,et al.  Motivación de los empleados: un poderoso modelo nuevo , 2008 .

[45]  Myriam Cloodt,et al.  Design Principles for Corporate Venture Transition Processes in Established Technology Firms , 2012 .

[46]  Amandine Pascal,et al.  Developing a Human‐Centred and Science‐Based Approach to Design: The Knowledge Management Platform Project , 2013 .

[47]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Designing social systems in a changing world , 1996 .

[48]  Neil Gross A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms , 2009 .

[49]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Paul Bate,et al.  Using a Design Approach to Assist Large-Scale Organizational Change , 2007 .

[51]  A. Romme,et al.  Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship , 2014 .

[52]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The BUSINESS SCHOOL A PROBLEM IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN , 1967 .

[53]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[54]  Nigel Cross,et al.  The problem of design problems , 2003 .

[55]  Isabelle M. M. J. Reymen,et al.  Searching for Partners in Open Innovation Settings: How to Overcome the Constraints of Local Search , 2018 .

[56]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Georges Romme,et al.  Creating University Spinoffs : A Science-Based Design Perspective , 2009 .

[58]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Solving Problems with Design Thinking: Ten Stories of What Works , 2013 .

[59]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis , 2008 .