Performance of ‘Chambourcin’ Winegrape on 10 Different Root Systems in Southern Missouri, USA

In the midwestern United States, especially Missouri, winegrape (Vitis sp.) growers mostly plant interspecific hybrids, which are well adapted to the climate and pests of the region. ‘Chambourcin’ (an interspecific French-American hybrid) is one of the most widely planted winegrape cultivars in the area. It is usually grown as own-rooted (nongrafted) vines because the economic and horticultural benefits of grafting this cultivar to rootstocks have not been well developed. Further, few significant winegrape rootstock evaluations have been conducted in the midwestern United States, including evaluations of newer rootstocks developed and released by private and public breeding programs. The aim of this study was to assess the potential value of using rootstocks in ‘Chambourcin’ production in southern Missouri, with implications for the midwestern United States. Fruit yield, vine growth, and fruit composition metrics from ‘Chambourcin’ on 10 different root systems [own-rooted, and grafted to rootstocks ‘Couderc 3309’, ‘Couderc 1616’, ‘Paulsen 1103’, ‘Sélection Oppenheim 4’, ‘Millardet et de Grasset 420A’, ‘Millardet et de Grasset 101-14’, ‘Kingfisher’, ‘Matador’ (all Vitis sp.), and ‘Gloire de Montpellier’ riverbank grape (Vitis riparia)] in an experimental vineyard in southwest Missouri were compared. Following three establishment years (2008–10), data were collected across four growing and vintage seasons (2011–14). Yield components evaluated included total fruit production, clusters per vine, cluster weight, berry weight, weight of cane prunings, and crop load. Petiole mineral analysis was conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2014. Grape juice attributes measured were soluble solids concentration, juice pH, titratable acidity (TA), potassium (K), anthocyanins, tannins, phenolics, and organic acids. When simply comparing grafted vs. ungrafted vines, grafting generally induced higher plant vigor and a higher pH in the juice, whereas the other parameters did not differ. When the performances were compared among the 10 root systems, vines grafted to ‘Couderc 3309’ had higher yields compared with vines grafted to six other rootstocks and own-rooted vines. Grafting to ‘Millardet et de Grasset 101-14’ induced higher cluster weight compared with the other rootstocks. The ‘Millardet et de Grasset 420A’ rootstock promoted a higher pH and TA as well as a higher concentration of K in the juice, and ‘Paulsen 1103’ also promoted high pH, TA, and malic acid in the juice, and higher concentrations of phosphorous (P) and K in the petiole compared with most rootstocks. ‘Gloire de Montpellier’ induced a lower P content in the petiole and a higher tartaric/malic acid ratio. Rootstock use can strongly influence some vineyard production metrics as well as nutrient uptake and K levels in the juice (the latter further influencing juice pH). The results of this study provide insights into the complex viticultural and enological interactions resulting from the use of rootstocks in hybrid winegrape production in Missouri, USA.

[1]  Allison J. Miller,et al.  Temporal and environmental factors interact with rootstock genotype to shape leaf elemental composition in grafted grapevines , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Stoll,et al.  Grapevine rootstock genotypes influences berry and wine phenolic composition ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir) , 2022 .

[3]  R. Schreiner,et al.  Irrigation and Rootstocks to Manage Northern Root-Knot Nematode During Wine Grape Vineyard Establishment , 2021, Plant Health Progress.

[4]  Fusuo Zhang,et al.  Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between potassium and magnesium in higher plants , 2020, The Crop Journal.

[5]  R. K. Striegler,et al.  Performance of ‘Chambourcin’ Winegrape on Nematode-resistant Rootstocks in Missouri , 2020, HortTechnology.

[6]  S. Cookson,et al.  Influence of the three main genetic backgrounds of grapevine rootstocks on petiolar nutrient concentrations of the scion, with a focus on phosphorus , 2020 .

[7]  R. K. Striegler,et al.  Grapevine rootstocks affect growth‐related scion phenotypes , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  J. Jones,et al.  Sampling, Handling, and Analyzing Plant Tissue Samples , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[9]  R. K. Striegler,et al.  Establishment Technique and Rootstock Impact ‘Chambourcin’ Grapevine Morphology and Production in Missouri , 2017 .

[10]  C. R. Hale Relation between potassium and the malate and tartrate contents of grape berries , 2016 .

[11]  R. K. Striegler,et al.  The influence of rootstock on the cold-hardiness of Seyval grapevines 1. Primary and secondary effects on growth, canopy development, yield, fruit quality and cold hardiness , 2015 .

[12]  G. S. Howell,et al.  Rootstock Scion Interaction and Effects on Vine Vigor, Phenology, and Cold Hardiness of Interspecific Hybrid Grape Cultivars (Vitis spp.) , 2013 .

[13]  H. Ferris,et al.  Resistance of Grape Rootstocks to Plant-parasitic Nematodes. , 2012, Journal of nematology.

[14]  S. Jogaiah,et al.  Influence of Cluster Exposure to Sun on Fruit Composition of ‘Norton’ Grapes (Vitis estivalis Michx) in Missouri , 2012 .

[15]  J. Whiting Rootstock breeding and associated R&D in the viticulture and wine industry , 2012 .

[16]  Ujwala Ranade Malvi Interaction of micronutrients with major nutrients with special reference to potassium , 2011 .

[17]  J. Tisdall,et al.  Accumulation of potassium in grapevine rootstocks (Vitis) as affected by dry matter partitioning, root traits and transpiration , 2009 .

[18]  S. Cookson,et al.  Scion genotype controls biomass allocation and root development in grafted grapevine , 2009 .

[19]  M. A. Anderson,et al.  Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils , 2008 .

[20]  J. Blanco,et al.  Influence of rootstock type on the agronomic characteristics of two grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars grown in the Northwestern Iberian Peninsula , 2007 .

[21]  P. Ribereau-gayon,et al.  Handbook of Enology: The Chemistry of Wine Stabilization and Treatments , 2006 .

[22]  D. Ferree,et al.  INFLUENCE OF CROP LOAD ON ´CHAMBOURCIN´ YIELD, FRUIT QUALITY, AND WINTER HARDINESS UNDER MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS , 2005 .

[23]  J. A. Sullivan,et al.  Influence of Training/Trellising System and Rootstock Selection on Productivity and Fruit Composition of Chardonnay and Cabernet franc Grapevines in Ontario, Canada , 2004, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[24]  D. Ferree,et al.  Effect of Time of Cluster Thinning Grapevines , 2003 .

[25]  G. Main,et al.  Rootstock Effects on Chardonel Productivity, Fruit, and Wine Composition , 2002, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[26]  V. D. Fageria NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS IN CROP PLANTS , 2001 .

[27]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Rootstocks Impact Vine Performance and Fruit Composition of Grapes in British Columbia , 2001 .

[28]  M. Matthews,et al.  The Influence of Phosphorus Availability, Scion, and Rootstock on Grapevine Shoot Growth, Leaf Area, and Petiole Phosphorus Concentration , 1996, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[29]  R. Boulton,et al.  Principles and Practices of Winemaking , 1995 .

[30]  L. Hidalgo,et al.  Tratado de viticultura general , 1993 .

[31]  R. K. Striegler,et al.  Influence of Rootstock on the Response of Seyval Grapevines to Flooding Stress , 1993, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[32]  E. Ruhl Uptake and distribution of potassium by grapevine rootstocks and its implication for grape juice pH of scion varieties , 1989 .

[33]  P. Clingeleffer,et al.  Effect of rootstocks on berry weight and pH, mineral content and organic acid concentrations of grape juice of some wine varieties , 1988 .

[34]  P. Iland Interpretation of acidity parameters in grapes and wine. , 1987 .

[35]  T. D. Jordan,et al.  Cultural Practices for Commercial Vineyards , 1980 .

[36]  R. Boulton The General Relationship Between Potassium, Sodium and pH in Grape Juice and Wine , 1980, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[37]  Cornelius S. Ough,et al.  Methods for analysis of musts and wines , 1980 .

[38]  R. Pool,et al.  Structure of Base Buds in Relation to Yield of Grapes , 1978, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[39]  M. Amerine,et al.  Acids and the Acid Taste. I. The Effect of pH and Titratable Acidity , 1965, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.