An agent‐based model for evaluating reforms of the National Flood Insurance Program: A benchmarked model applied to Jamaica Bay, NYC

Coastal flood risk is expected to increase as a result of climate change effects, such as sea level rise, and socioeconomic growth. To support policymakers in making adaptation decisions, accurate flood risk assessments that account for the influence of complex adaptation processes on the developments of risks are essential. In this study, we integrate the dynamic adaptive behavior of homeowners within a flood risk modeling framework. Focusing on building‐level adaptation and flood insurance, the agent‐based model (DYNAMO) is benchmarked with empirical data for New York City, USA. The model simulates the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and frequently proposed reforms to evaluate their effectiveness. The model is applied to a case study of Jamaica Bay, NY. Our results indicate that risk‐based premiums can improve insurance penetration rates and the affordability of insurance compared to the baseline NFIP market structure. While a premium discount for disaster risk reduction incentivizes more homeowners to invest in dry‐floodproofing measures, it does not significantly improve affordability. A low interest rate loan for financing risk‐mitigation investments improves the uptake and affordability of dry‐floodproofing measures. The benchmark and sensitivity analyses demonstrate how the behavioral component of our model matches empirical data and provides insights into the underlying theories and choices that autonomous agents make.

[1]  Jantsje M. Mol,et al.  Behavioral motivations for self-insurance under different disaster risk insurance schemes , 2020 .

[2]  Hans de Moel,et al.  A micro-scale cost-benefit analysis of building-level flood risk adaptation measures in Los Angeles , 2020 .

[3]  W. Botzen,et al.  An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society , 2020, Environmental Hazards.

[4]  P. Hudson.  The Affordability of Flood Risk Property‐Level Adaptation Measures , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Mario A. Giampieri,et al.  Storm tide amplification and habitat changes due to urbanization of a lagoonal estuary , 2020, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[6]  W. Botzen,et al.  The safe development paradox: An agent-based model for flood risk under climate change in the European Union , 2020, Global Environmental Change.

[7]  Gina L. Tonn,et al.  Simulating Behavioral Influences on Community Flood Risk under Future Climate Scenarios , 2019, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  J. Aerts,et al.  Flood insurance arrangements in the European Union for future flood risk under climate and socioeconomic change , 2019, Global Environmental Change.

[9]  W. Botzen,et al.  An economic evaluation of adaptation pathways in coastal mega cities: An illustration for Los Angeles. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  The integration of local government, residents, and insurance in coastal adaptation: An agent-based modeling approach , 2019, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[11]  Toon Haer,et al.  Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  Benjamin M. Miller,et al.  Reasonable and Risk‐Based? Replacing NFIP Generally Subsidized Rates with a Means‐Tested Subsidy , 2019, Southern Economic Journal.

[13]  Jacob P. Hochard,et al.  Economics, Insurance, and Flood Hazards , 2019, Southern Economic Journal.

[14]  B. Collier,et al.  The Influence of Sellers on Contract Choice: Evidence from Flood Insurance , 2019, Journal of Risk and Insurance.

[15]  J. Aerts.  A Review of Cost Estimates for Flood Adaptation , 2018, Water.

[16]  P. Hudson.  A comparison of definitions of affordability for flood risk adaption measures: a case study of current and future risk-based flood insurance premiums in Europe , 2018, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[17]  Gina L. Tonn,et al.  An Agent‐Based Model of Evolving Community Flood Risk , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  K. Clarke,et al.  Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[19]  Uwe Sunde,et al.  Global Evidence on Economic Preferences , 2017, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[20]  Jared T. Brown.  Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) , 2017 .

[21]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Framing options for characterising and parameterising human agents in empirical ABM , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Benjamin M. Miller,et al.  The Cost and Affordability of Flood Insurance in New York City: Economic Impacts of Rising Premiums and Policy Options for One- to Four-family Homes , 2017 .

[23]  Marilyn C. Montgomery,et al.  Assessing Current and Future Freshwater Flood Risk from North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones via Insurance Claims , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[25]  R. Kopp,et al.  Hurricane Sandy’s flood frequency increasing from year 1800 to 2100 , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  A. Blumberg,et al.  A Validated Tropical-Extratropical Flood Hazard Assessment for New York Harbor. , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Oceans.

[27]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Global drivers of future river flood risk , 2016 .

[28]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Affordability of the National Flood Insurance Program: Application to Charleston County, South Carolina , 2016 .

[29]  A. Thieken,et al.  Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction – Success or Warning Sign for Paris? , 2015 .

[30]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[31]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes , 2015 .

[32]  Ferdinand M. Vieider,et al.  Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: evidence from 30 countries , 2015 .

[33]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Could Flood Insurance be Privatised in the United States? A Primer , 2015 .

[34]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Could Flood Insurance be Privatised in the United States? A Primer , 2014, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice.

[35]  Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler,et al.  Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods , 2014 .

[36]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Addressing Affordability in the National Flood Insurance Program , 2013 .

[37]  Paul Watkiss,et al.  Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation , 2013 .

[38]  A. Scolobig,et al.  Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk - Roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust , 2013 .

[39]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global flood risk under climate change , 2013 .

[40]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future flood losses in major coastal cities , 2013 .

[41]  G. Di Baldassarre,et al.  Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems , 2013 .

[42]  W. Botzen,et al.  Cost estimates for flood resilience and protection strategies in New York City , 2013, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[44]  Francesco Trebbi,et al.  RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH LARGE AND SMALL STAKES , 2012 .

[45]  J. Aerts,et al.  Global exposure to river and coastal flooding - long term trends and changes , 2012 .

[46]  Okmyung Bin,et al.  Changes in Implicit Flood Risk Premiums: Empirical Evidence from the Housing Market , 2012 .

[47]  K. Emanuel,et al.  Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change , 2012 .

[48]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Social Cost of Carbon , 2011 .

[49]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Redesigning Flood Insurance , 2011, Science.

[50]  J. Aerts,et al.  Flood‐resilient waterfront development in New York City: Bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[51]  C. Kousky,et al.  Come Rain or Shine: Evidence on Flood Insurance Purchases in Florida , 2010 .

[52]  Mahmoud A. El-Gamal,et al.  Risk Loving after the Storm: A Bayesian-Network Study of Hurricane-Katrina Evacuees , 2009 .

[53]  Michael Batty,et al.  SERIES Key Challenges in Agent-Based Modelling for GeoSpatial Simulation , 2007 .

[54]  Scott Moss,et al.  Alternative Approaches to the Empirical Validation of Agent-Based Models , 2007, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[55]  Céline Lutoff,et al.  How to get there? Assessing motorists' flash flood risk perception on daily itineraries , 2007 .

[56]  Craig R. Fox,et al.  “Decisions from experience” = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004) , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[57]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People's Perceptions and Expert's Assessments in Switzerland , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[58]  L. Dixon,et al.  The National Flood Insurance Program’s Market Penetration Rate , 2006 .

[59]  Mitja Brilly,et al.  Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation , 2005 .

[60]  Wolfgang Kron,et al.  Flood Risk = Hazard • Values • Vulnerability , 2005 .

[61]  G. Harrison,et al.  Naturally Occurring Preferences and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of Risk Aversion , 2004 .

[62]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[63]  H. Kunreuther.  Mitigating disaster losses through insurance , 1996 .

[64]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  A behavioral model of the adoption of protective activities , 1985 .

[65]  H. Kunreuther.  Summary: Insuring High Risks Fairly, Protecting Individuals Against Flood Losses , 2019 .

[66]  E. Sanderson,et al.  Building Resilience in an Urban Coastal Environment , 2018 .

[67]  Jesus Crespo Cuaresma,et al.  Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics , 2017 .

[68]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[69]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[70]  M. Strubegger,et al.  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[71]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Future growth patterns of world regions – A GDP scenario approach , 2017 .

[72]  K. Calvin,et al.  Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[73]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .