The James Lind Library: explaining and illustrating the evolution of fair tests of medical treatments.

The James Lind Library (www.jameslindlibrary.org) has been established to improve public and professional general knowledge about fair tests of treatments in healthcare and their history. Its foundation was laid ten years ago at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, and its administrative centre is in the College's Sibbald Library, one of the most important collections of historic medical manuscripts, papers and books in the world. The James Lind Library is a website that introduces visitors to the principles of fair tests of treatments, with a series of short, illustrated essays, which are currently available in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish. A 100-page book-- Testing Treatments--is now available free through the website, both in English and in Arabic and Spanish translations. To illustrate the evolution of ideas related to fair tests of treatments from 2000 BC to the present, the James Lind Library contains key passages and images from manuscripts, books and journal articles, many of them accompanied by commentaries, biographies, portraits and other relevant documents and images, including audio and video files. New material is being added to the website continuously, as relevant new records are identified and as methods for testing treatments evolve. A multinational, multilingual editorial team oversees the development of the website, which currently receives tens of thousands of visitors every month.

[1]  A. Maehle.  "To Improve the Evidence of Medicine": The 18th century British Origins of a Critical Approach: The 18th century British Origins of a Critical Approach , 2002 .

[2]  W. Silverman.  Personal reflections on lessons learned from randomized trials involving newborn infants from 1951 to 1967 , 2004, Clinical trials.

[3]  M. Clarke,et al.  Commentary: the 1944 patulin trial: the first properly controlled multicentre trial conducted under the aegis of the British Medical Research Council. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  D. Cox-Maksimov.  The making of the clinical trial in Britain, 1910-1945 : expertise, the state and the public , 1997 .

[6]  M. Bracken.  Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[7]  M. Clarke.  The 1944 patulin trial of the British Medical Research Council , 2006 .

[8]  J. Lind,et al.  The MRC randomized trial of streptomycin and its legacy: a view from the clinical front line. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  I. Loudon.  The use of historical controls and concurrent controls to assess the effects of sulphonamides, 1936–1945 , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[10]  Martin R Howard,et al.  Book Review: To Improve the Evidence of Medicine: The 18th Century British Origins of a Critical Approach , 2001 .

[11]  T. Kaptchuk,et al.  William Cullen and a missing mind-body link in the early history of placebos , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[12]  M Stolberg.  Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: the Nuremberg salt test of 1835. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[13]  T. Kaptchuk,et al.  Intentional Ignorance: A History of Blind Assessment and Placebo Controls in Medicine , 1998, Bulletin of the history of medicine.

[14]  S. Tchamouroff.  Al-Razi and Islamic medicine in the 9th century , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  P. Elwood.  The first randomized trial of aspirin for heart attack and the advent of systematic overviews of trials. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[16]  H. Marks.  The Kendrick-Eldering-(Frost) pertussis vaccine field trial. , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[17]  R. Doll.  Controlled Trials Testing two or More Treatments Simultaneously , 2005 .

[18]  Alan Cantor,et al.  The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research , 2000, The Lancet.

[19]  Alan Yoshioka.  Use of randomisation in the Medical Research Council's clinical trial of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis in the 1940s , 1998, BMJ.

[20]  I. Chalmers.  Joseph Asbury Bell and the birth of randomized trials. , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[21]  A. Morabia.  A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts , 2005, Birkhäuser Basel.

[22]  L WEINGARTNER,et al.  [Streptomycin treatment of tuberculous meningitis and pulmonary tuberculosis]. , 1953, Das Deutsche Gesundheitswesen.

[23]  E. Huth.  Quantitative Evidence for Judgments on the Efficacy of Inoculation for the Prevention of Smallpox: England and New England in the 1700s , 2006 .

[24]  J. Hilden,et al.  Povl Heiberg's 1897 methodological study on the statistical method as an aid in therapeutic trials. , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[25]  Edward Huth.  Jules Gavarret's Principes Généraux de Statistique Médicale , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[26]  Ike Iheanacho,et al.  Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  J. Lind,et al.  Reflections on my studies of the effects of sulphonamide drugs in bacillary dysentery in Egypt, 1943-1944. , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[28]  Alfredo Morabia.  A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts , 2004 .

[29]  H. Marks.  James Angus Doull and the well-controlled common cold , 2008, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.