Laterality differences in perception: a review.

[1]  Tachistoscopic recognition of number sequences. , 1968 .

[2]  Merrell Dj Dominance of eye and hand. , 1957 .

[3]  D. Kimura Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. , 1961 .

[4]  D KIMURA,et al.  The effect of letter position on recognition. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  M. White Signal-detection analysis of laterality differences: some preliminary data, free of recall and report-sequence characteristics. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  H. Sampson Immediate Memory and Simultaneous Visual Stimulation , 1964 .

[8]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[9]  G. Adevai,et al.  Some relationships between handedness and perception. , 1966, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[10]  E R HARCUM,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Reversals on Lateral Dominance in Word Recognition , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  VISUAL FIELD AND THE LETTER SPAN. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  William G. Chase,et al.  Short-term visual storage , 1967 .

[13]  G. Mangan Recognition in the Dominant and Non-Dominant Visual Hemifields , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  H. R. Crosland,et al.  A Method of Measuring the Effect of Primacy of Report in the Range of Attention Experiment , 1933 .

[15]  H. Lansdell Laterality of Verbal Intelligence in the Brain , 1962, Science.

[16]  M. Bryden Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness, and cerebral dominance☆ , 1965 .

[17]  M. Corballis Binocular interactions in letter recognition , 1964 .

[18]  N. Mackworth Visual noise causes tunnel vision , 1965 .

[19]  M. Bryden Left-Right Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition: Directional Scanning or Cerebral Dominance? , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[20]  M. Bryden Tachistoscopic Recognition and Cerebral Dominance , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[21]  R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Left-Right Field Differences with Partial Report of Letters , 1967 .

[22]  J. Ayres,et al.  Some artifactual causes of perceptual primacy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  D. Bakker Shorter Articles and Notes Left-Right Differences in Auditory Perception of Verbal and Non-Verbal Material by Children , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Letter-position effects, in the range of attention experiment, as affected by the number of letters in each exposure. , 1931 .

[25]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Effects of unilateral temporal lobe removals in man on tachistoscopic recognition in the left and right visual fields , 1965 .

[26]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Sequential redundancy and letter spacing as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Identification of Consonants and Vowels Presented to Left and Right Ears* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  M. J. Meier,et al.  Lateralized deficits in complex visual discrimination and bilateral transfer of reminiscence following unilateral temporal lobectomy , 1965 .

[29]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  DOMINANCE OF THE TEMPORAL VISUAL FIELDS AT A SHORT DURATION OF STIMULATION. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[30]  Harcum Er EFFECTS OF SYMMETRY ON THE PERCEPTION OF TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1964 .

[31]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  M. Bryden,et al.  LEFT-RIGHT DIFFERENCES IN TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  H. Sampson,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Immediate Memory , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  J. Orbach,et al.  Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[35]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Letter Recognition within Words Flashed Left and Right of Fixation , 1962, Science.

[36]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic recognition. , 1966 .

[37]  Harcum Er,et al.  PRE- VERSUS POST-KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIRED REPRODUCTION SEQUENCE FOR TACHISTOSCOPIC PATTERNS. , 1963 .

[38]  R. Dodge,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE OCULAR REACTIONS OF THE INSANE FROM PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDS. , 1908 .

[39]  Harcum Er,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963 .

[40]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Monocular and binocular reproduction of binary stimuli appearing right and left of fixation. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[41]  W. R. Miles,et al.  Ocular dominance demonstrated by unconscious sighting. , 1929 .

[42]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Differential Recognition of Tachistoscopically Presented English and Hebrew Words in Right and Left Visual Fields , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[43]  J. Ayres,et al.  Directional Response-Bias in Reproducing Brief Visual Patterns , 1962 .

[44]  G. Ettlinger,et al.  Efficiency of recognition in left and right visual fields. Its relation to the phenomenom of visual extinction. , 1961, Archives of neurology.

[45]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  M. Wiener,et al.  Visual field position and work-recognition threshold. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  W. Penfield,et al.  Speech and Brain‐Mechanisms , 1960 .

[48]  Bryden Mp,et al.  Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. , 1960 .

[49]  D. Kimura Left-right Differences in the Perception of Melodies , 1964 .

[50]  H. F. Crovitz Differential Acuity of the Two Eyes and the Problem of Ocular Dominances , 1961, Science.

[51]  R. Palmer CEREBRAL DOMINANCE AND AUDITORY ASYMMETRY. , 1964, The Journal of psychology.

[52]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[53]  T. Rasmussen,et al.  INTRACAROTID INJECTION OF SODIUM AMYTAL FOR THE LATERALIZATION OF CEREBRAL SPEECH DOMINANCE EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS , 1960 .

[54]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Effects of temporal-lobe damage of perception of dichotically presented melodies. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[55]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  Tendencies to eye movement and perceptual accuracy. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[56]  Kenneth N. Ogle,et al.  Ocular dominance and binocular retinal rivalry , 1962 .

[57]  J. Orbach Differential recognition of Hebrew and English words in right and left visual fields as a function of cerebral dominance and reading habits , 1967 .

[58]  P. Satz,et al.  Order of report and ear asymmetry in dichotic listening , 1967 .

[59]  H F Crovitz,et al.  Identification and localization in the letter span. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[60]  M. Bryden,et al.  Ocular Dominance and Perceptual Asymmetry , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[61]  The letter span in space and time , 1968 .

[62]  A. O. Dick,et al.  Order of report and processing in tachistoscopic recognition , 1967 .

[63]  H. Terrace,et al.  The effects of retinal and attention on the perception of words. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[64]  W. A. Winnick,et al.  Right-Left Differences in Tachistoscopic Identification of Paralogs as a Function of Order of Approximation to English Letter Sequences , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[65]  Murray J. White Identification and localization within digit and letter spans , 1969 .

[66]  D KIMURA,et al.  Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[67]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Handedness and Differential Perception of Verbal Stimuli in Left and Right Visual Fields , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[68]  D. Forgays The development of differential word recognition. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[69]  W. A. Winnick,et al.  Pre- and Post-Exposure Processes in Tachistoscopic Identification , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.