Development of a bioactive implant for repair and potential healing of cranial defects.

The repair of complex craniofacial bone defects is challenging and a successful result is dependent on the size of the defect, quality of the soft tissue covering the defect, and choice of reconstruction method. The objective of this study was to develop a bioactive cranial implant that could provide a permanent reconstructive solution to the patient by stimulating bone healing of the defect. In this paper the authors report on the feasibility and clinical results of using such a newly developed device for the repair of a large traumatic and therapy-resistant cranial bone defect. The patient had undergone numerous attempts at repair, in which established methods had been tried without success. A mosaic-designed device was manufactured and implanted, comprising interconnected ceramic tiles with a defined calcium phosphate composition. The clinical outcome 30 months after surgery revealed a restored cranial vault without postoperative complications. Computed tomography demonstrated signs of bone ingrowth. Examination with combined (18)F-fluoride PET and CT provided further evidence of bone healing of the cranial defect.

[1]  R Cancedda,et al.  Repair of large bone defects with the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Faleh Tamimi,et al.  Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a comparison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autologous onlay grafts in the rabbit. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[3]  D. Marchac,et al.  Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[4]  S. Popoff,et al.  Bone cell biology: the regulation of development, structure, and function in the skeleton. , 1988, The American journal of anatomy.

[5]  Matthew D. Kwan,et al.  Origin Matters: Differences in Embryonic Tissue Origin and Wnt Signaling Determine the Osteogenic Potential and Healing Capacity of Frontal and Parietal Calvarial Bones , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  Huipin Yuan,et al.  Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Martin Klein,et al.  Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[8]  K. Ho,et al.  Long-term complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[9]  C. Compagnone,et al.  Custom made cranioplasty prostheses in porous hydroxy-apatite using 3D design techniques: 7 years experience in 25 patients , 2007, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[10]  B. Chang,et al.  The First Clinical Trial of Beta-Calcium Pyrophosphate as a Novel Bone Graft Extender in Instrumented Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion , 2011, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[11]  R. Legeros,et al.  Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  M Bohner,et al.  In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[13]  C. Laurencin,et al.  Studies of bone morphogenetic protein-based surgical repair. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[14]  J. Winkles,et al.  Progressive Ankylosis Protein (ANK) in Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts Controls Bone Formation and Bone Remodeling , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  G. Hannink,et al.  Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration? , 2011, Injury.

[16]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Time course of bone metabolism at the residual ridge beneath dentures observed using 18F-fluoride positron emission computerized-tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) , 2012, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  F. Carinci,et al.  Clinical Outcome of 285 Medpor Grafts used for Craniofacial Reconstruction , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  Erik Neovius,et al.  Craniofacial reconstruction with bone and biomaterials: review over the last 11 years. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[19]  Sergey V. Dorozhkin,et al.  Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[20]  A. Lindahl,et al.  Premixed acidic calcium phosphate cement: characterization of strength and microstructure. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  N. Hatch,et al.  Ectonucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase-1 (ENPP1) Protein Regulates Osteoblast Differentiation , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  John,et al.  Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. , 2009, Neurosurgical focus.

[23]  C. Lind,et al.  Observed versus predicted outcome for decompressive craniectomy: a population-based study. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[24]  B. French,et al.  Induced Membrane Technique for Reconstruction To Manage Bone Loss , 2012, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.