Improved spectral fitting of nitrogen dioxide from OMI in the 405–465 nm window

Abstract. An improved nitrogen dioxide (NO2) slant column density retrieval for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) in the 405–465 nm spectral region is presented. Since the launch of OMI on board NASA's EOS-Aura satellite in 2004, differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) retrievals of NO2 slant column densities have been the starting point for the KNMI DOMINO and NASA SP NO2 vertical column data as well as the OMI NO2 data of some other institutes. However, recent intercomparisons between NO2 retrievals from OMI and other UV/Vis and limb spectrometers, as well as ground-based measurements, suggest that OMI stratospheric NO2 is biased high. This study revises and, for the first time, fully documents the OMI NO2 retrieval in detail. The representation of the OMI slit function to convolve high-resolution reference spectra onto the relevant spectral grid is improved. The window used for the wavelength calibration is optimised, leading to much-reduced fitting errors. Ozone and water vapour spectra used in the fit are updated, reflecting the recently improved knowledge of their absorption cross section in the literature. The improved spectral fit also accounts for absorption by the O2–O2 collision complex and by liquid water over clear-water areas. The main changes in the improved spectral fitting result from the updates related to the wavelength calibration: the RMS error of the fit is reduced by 23% and the NO2 slant column by 0.85 × 1015 molec cm−2, independent of latitude, solar zenith angle and NO2 value. Including O2–O2 and liquid water absorption and updating the O3 and water vapour cross-section spectra further reduces NO2 slant columns on average by 0.35 × 1015 molec cm−2, accompanied by a further 9% reduction in the RMS error of the fit. The improved OMI NO2 slant columns are consistent with independent NO2 retrievals from other instruments to within a range that can be explained by photochemically driven diurnal increases in stratospheric NO2 and by small differences in fitting window and approach. The revisions indicate that current OMI NO2 slant columns suffered mostly from an additive positive offset, which is removed by the improved wavelength calibration and representation of the OMI slit function. It is therefore anticipated that the improved NO2 slant columns are most important to retrievals of spatially homogeneous stratospheric NO2 rather than to heterogeneous tropospheric NO2.

[1]  I. D. Smedt,et al.  Glyoxal vertical columns from GOME-2 backscattered light measurements and comparisons with a global model , 2010 .

[2]  R. Volkamer,et al.  Temperature Dependent Absorption Cross-Sections of O 2O 2 collision pairs 1 between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure 2 3 , 2013 .

[3]  James F. Gleason,et al.  Algorithm for NO/sub 2/ vertical column retrieval from the ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Henk Eskes,et al.  TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications , 2012 .

[5]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy , 2008 .

[6]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Introduction to Atmospheric Chemistry , 1999 .

[7]  Florence Goutail,et al.  O3 and NO2 ground‐based measurements by visible spectrometry during Arctic winter and spring 1988 , 1988 .

[8]  J. Burrows,et al.  Inelastic scattering in ocean water and its impact on trace gas retrievals from satellite data , 2003 .

[9]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Evaluation of stratospheric NO2 retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument : intercomparison, diurnal cycle and trending , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (Gome) : Mission, instrument concept, and first scientific results , 1997 .

[11]  U. Platt,et al.  Numerical analysis and estimation of the statistical error of differential optical absorption spectroscopy measurements with least-squares methods. , 1996, Applied optics.

[12]  B. Connor,et al.  Northern and southern hemisphere ground-based infrared spectroscopic measurements of tropospheric , 1998 .

[13]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space , 2004 .

[14]  Sanford Sillman,et al.  The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes , 1990 .

[15]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  Post‐Mount Pinatubo eruption ground‐based infrared stratospheric column measurements of HNO3, NO, and NO2 and their comparison with model calculations , 2003 .

[16]  Klaus Pfeilsticker,et al.  An intercomparison campaign of ground-based UV-visible measurements of NO2, BrO, and OClO slant columns: Methods of analysis and results for NO2 , 2005 .

[17]  Yugo Kanaya,et al.  Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO 2 and O 4 by MAX-DOAS and zenith-sky UV and visible spectrometers , 2010 .

[18]  J. W. Brault,et al.  Atmospheric measurements of water vapor in the 442‐nm region , 1997 .

[19]  Robert Voors,et al.  Prelaunch characterization of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument transfer function in the spectral domain. , 2006, Applied optics.

[20]  K. Strong,et al.  Temperature-dependent absorption cross-sections of , 2009 .

[21]  Robert Voors,et al.  Method of calibration to correct for cloud-induced wavelength shifts in the Aura satellite's Ozone Monitoring Instrument. , 2006, Applied optics.

[22]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Analysis of stratospheric NO2 trends above Jungfraujoch using ground-based UV-visible, FTIR, and satellite nadir observations , 2012 .

[23]  S. Beirle,et al.  Linearisation of the effects of spectral shift and stretch in DOAS analysis , 2012 .

[24]  Robert Voors,et al.  OMI In-Flight Wavelength Calibration and the Solar Reference Spectrum , 2006 .

[25]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  P. Levelt,et al.  Intercomparison of daytime stratospheric NO 2 satellite retrievals and model simulations , 2014 .

[27]  James F. Gleason,et al.  Ocean Raman scattering in satellite backscatter UV measurements , 2002 .

[28]  Nadine Unger,et al.  Improved Attribution of Climate Forcing to Emissions , 2009, Science.

[29]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  Differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) , 1994 .

[30]  James F. Gleason,et al.  A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments : applications to OMI , 2013 .

[31]  D. Fahey,et al.  Reactive nitrogen and its correlation with ozone in the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere , 1993 .

[32]  Xin-Zhong Liang,et al.  Climatic forcing of nitrogen oxides through changes in tropospheric ozone and methane; global 3D model studies , 1999 .

[33]  Andreas Hilboll,et al.  An improved NO 2 retrieval for the GOME-2 satellite instrument , 2011 .

[34]  Ann Carine Vandaele,et al.  Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm−1 to 10 000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K , 1998 .

[35]  Paul C. Simon,et al.  Ground-based visible measurements at the Jungfraujoch station since 1990 , 1994 .

[36]  K. Chance,et al.  Ring effect studies: Rayleigh scattering, including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering, and the Fraunhofer spectrum. , 1997, Applied optics.

[37]  S. Reimann,et al.  Our changing atmosphere: evidence based on long-term infrared solar observations at the Jungfraujoch since 1950. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[38]  E. Fry,et al.  Absorption spectrum (380-700 nm) of pure water. II. Integrating cavity measurements. , 1997, Applied optics.

[39]  P. Levelt,et al.  The High-Resolution Solar Reference Spectrum between 250 and 550 nm and its Application to Measurements with the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2008 .

[40]  E. R. Polovtseva,et al.  The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database , 2013 .

[41]  Henk Eskes,et al.  An improved tropospheric NO 2 column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2011 .

[42]  Pieter Valks,et al.  Ten years of GOME/ERS-2 total ozone data—The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 1. Algorithm description , 2006 .

[43]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes , 1999 .

[44]  A. Vandaele,et al.  Absorption cross-sections of atmospheric constituents: NO2, O2, and H2O , 1999, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[45]  Robert J. D. Spurr,et al.  Six years of total ozone column measurements from SCIAMACHY nadir observations , 2008 .

[46]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Megacity Emissions and Lifetimes of Nitrogen Oxides Probed from Space , 2011, Science.

[47]  R. Harrison Introduction to atmospheric chemistry , 2000 .

[48]  P. Crutzen The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content , 1970 .

[49]  L. Marquard,et al.  Corrections for zenith scattered light DOAS , 1997 .

[50]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[51]  Michael Eisinger,et al.  The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results , 1999 .

[52]  J. Grainger,et al.  Anomalous Fraunhofer Line Profiles , 1962, Nature.

[53]  J. Burrows,et al.  Liquid water absorption and scattering effects in DOAS retrievals over oceans , 2014 .

[54]  Thomas Danckaert,et al.  QDOAS Software user manual , 2016 .

[55]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Retrieval of nitrogen dioxide stratospheric profiles from ground-based zenith-sky UV-visible observations: validation of the technique through correlative comparisons , 2004 .

[56]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  Near-real time retrieval of tropospheric NO 2 from OMI , 2006 .