Characterizing conflict and congruence of molecular evolution across organellar genome sequences for phylogenetics in land plants

Chloroplasts and mitochondria each contain their own genomes, which have historically been and continue to be important sources of information for inferring the phylogenetic relationships among land plants. The organelles are predominantly inherited from the same parent, and therefore should exhibit phylogenetic concordance. In this study, we examine the mitochondrion and chloroplast genomes of 226 land plants to infer the degree of similarity between the organelles’ evolutionary histories. Our results show largely concordant topologies are inferred between the organelles, aside from four well-supported conflicting relationships that warrant further investigation. Despite broad patterns of topological concordance, our findings suggest that the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes evolved with significant differences in molecular evolution. The differences result in the genes from the chloroplast and the mitochondrion preferentially clustering with other genes from their respective organelles by a program that automates selection of evolutionary model partitions for sequence alignments. Further investigation showed that changes in compositional heterogeneity are not always uniform across divergences in the land plant tree of life. These results indicate that although the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes have coexisted for over 1 billion years, phylogenetically, they are still evolving sufficiently independently to warrant separate models of evolution. As genome sequencing becomes more accessible, research into these organelles’ evolution will continue revealing insight into the ancient cellular events that shaped not only their history, but the history of plants as a whole.

[1]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Compositional shifts associated with major evolutionary transitions in plants , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Bock,et al.  Control of plastid inheritance by environmental and genetic factors , 2023, Nature Plants.

[3]  T. Lenton,et al.  The origin and early evolution of plants. , 2022, Trends in plant science.

[4]  C. Davis,et al.  PhyloHerb: A high‐throughput phylogenomic pipeline for processing genome skimming data , 2022, Applications in plant sciences.

[5]  M. F. Camus,et al.  Inheritance through the cytoplasm , 2022, Heredity.

[6]  Sunil Kumar Sahu,et al.  Comparative Analyses of 3,654 Plastid Genomes Unravel Insights Into Evolutionary Dynamics and Phylogenetic Discordance of Green Plants , 2022, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[7]  Xiangdong Yang,et al.  Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence and Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Cultivated Cyperus esculentus , 2021, Diversity.

[8]  Li-an Xu,et al.  Parent–offspring variation transmission in full-sib families revealed predominantly paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in Pinus massoniana (Pinaceae) , 2021, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[9]  J. Doyle Defining coalescent genes: Theory meets practice in organelle phylogenomics. , 2021, Systematic biology.

[10]  Gregory W. Stull,et al.  Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms , 2021, Nature Plants.

[11]  Matthew G. Johnson,et al.  A Comprehensive Phylogenomic Platform for Exploring the Angiosperm Tree of Life , 2021, bioRxiv.

[12]  Xianchun Zhang,et al.  NOVOWrap: An automated solution for plastid genome assembly and structure standardization , 2020, Molecular ecology resources.

[13]  C. Cox,et al.  The Chloroplast Land Plant Phylogeny: Analyses Employing Better-Fitting Tree- and Site-Heterogeneous Composition Models , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[14]  Diego F. Morales-Briones,et al.  Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Data Sets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l , 2020, Systematic biology.

[15]  Gregory W. Stull,et al.  Nuclear phylogenomic analyses of asterids conflict with plastome trees and support novel relationships among major lineages. , 2020, American journal of botany.

[16]  C. Cox,et al.  The mitochondrial phylogeny of land plants shows support for Setaphyta under composition-heterogeneous substitution models , 2020, PeerJ.

[17]  Antonis Rokas,et al.  Disentangling biological and analytical factors that give rise to outlier genes in phylogenomic matrices , 2020, bioRxiv.

[18]  Don C. Jones,et al.  Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement , 2020, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Gregory W. Stull,et al.  Exploration of Plastid Phylogenomic Conflict Yields New Insights into the Deep Relationships of Leguminosae , 2020, Systematic biology.

[20]  S. Ho,et al.  Phylogenetic signal is associated with the degree of variation in root-to-tip distances , 2020, bioRxiv.

[21]  Diego F. Morales-Briones,et al.  Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l , 2020 .

[22]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC CONFLICTS, COMBINABILITY, AND DEEP PHYLOGENOMICS IN PLANTS. , 2019, Systematic biology.

[23]  C. dePamphilis,et al.  GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes , 2019, bioRxiv.

[24]  Xun Xu,et al.  One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants , 2019, Nature.

[25]  Robert K. Jansen,et al.  Incongruence between gene trees and species trees and phylogenetic signal variation in plastid genes. , 2019, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[26]  T. Yi,et al.  Plastome Reduction in the Only Parasitic Gymnosperm Parasitaxus Is Due to Losses of Photosynthesis but Not Housekeeping Genes and Apparently Involves the Secondary Gain of a Large Inverted Repeat , 2019, Genome biology and evolution.

[27]  G. Petersen,et al.  Mitochondrial genome evolution in parasitic plants , 2019, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[28]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Assessing Combinability of Phylogenomic Data using Bayes Factors , 2018, bioRxiv.

[29]  Gregory W. Stull,et al.  Characterizing gene tree conflict in plastome-inferred phylogenies , 2019, bioRxiv.

[30]  Seung In Park,et al.  Mitochondrial and Plastid Genomes from Coralline Red Algae Provide Insights into the Incongruent Evolutionary Histories of Organelles , 2018, Genome biology and evolution.

[31]  Jeremy M. Brown,et al.  Variation Across Mitochondrial Gene Trees Provides Evidence for Systematic Error: How Much Gene Tree Variation Is Biological? , 2018, Systematic biology.

[32]  A. Schneider,et al.  Convergent Plastome Evolution and Gene Loss in Holoparasitic Lennoaceae , 2018, Genome biology and evolution.

[33]  Jin-Hua Ran,et al.  Phylogenomics resolves the deep phylogeny of seed plants and indicates partial convergent or homoplastic evolution between Gnetales and angiosperms , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Bruno Contreras-Moreira,et al.  Comparative plastome genomics and phylogenomics of Brachypodium: flowering time signatures, introgression and recombination in recently diverged ecotypes. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[35]  Stephen A Smith,et al.  So many genes, so little time: A practical approach to divergence-time estimation in the genomic era , 2018, PloS one.

[36]  Mark N. Puttick,et al.  The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte , 2018, Current Biology.

[37]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. , 2018, American journal of botany.

[38]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Plastid phylogenomic analysis of green plants: A billion years of evolutionary history. , 2018, American journal of botany.

[39]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  Complex Models of Sequence Evolution Require Accurate Estimators as Exemplified with the Invariable Site Plus Gamma Model , 2017, bioRxiv.

[40]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times. , 2017, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[42]  Y. van de Peer,et al.  Contrasting Rates of Molecular Evolution and Patterns of Selection among Gymnosperms and Flowering Plants , 2017, Molecular biology and evolution.

[43]  Joseph W. Brown,et al.  Phyx: phylogenetic tools for unix , 2017, Bioinform..

[44]  Karen B Barnard-Kubow,et al.  Biparental chloroplast inheritance leads to rescue from cytonuclear incompatibility. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[45]  N. Street,et al.  Interspecific Plastome Recombination Reflects Ancient Reticulate Evolution in Picea (Pinaceae) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[46]  Charles S. P. Foster,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Genomic Data and Priors on Bayesian Estimates of the Angiosperm Evolutionary Timescale , 2016, Systematic biology.

[47]  Ben Nichols,et al.  Distributed under Creative Commons Cc-by 4.0 Vsearch: a Versatile Open Source Tool for Metagenomics , 2022 .

[48]  M. Christenhusz,et al.  The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase , 2016 .

[49]  Olga Chernomor,et al.  Terrace Aware Data Structure for Phylogenomic Inference from Supermatrices , 2016, Systematic biology.

[50]  Jeffrey P. Mower,et al.  Ginkgo and Welwitschia Mitogenomes Reveal Extreme Contrasts in Gymnosperm Mitochondrial Evolution. , 2016, Molecular biology and evolution.

[51]  G. Petersen,et al.  Massive gene loss in mistletoe (Viscum, Viscaceae) mitochondria , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Jeffrey P. Mower,et al.  Dynamic evolution of Geranium mitochondrial genomes through multiple horizontal and intracellular gene transfers. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[53]  Peter Crane,et al.  Heterogeneous Rates of Molecular Evolution and Diversification Could Explain the Triassic Age Estimate for Angiosperms Systematic Biology Advance Access Published May 4, 2015 , 2022 .

[54]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Analysis of phylogenomic datasets reveals conflict, concordance, and gene duplications with examples from animals and plants , 2015, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[55]  P. Keeling,et al.  Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: Reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  A. von Haeseler,et al.  IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[57]  Mark Fishbein,et al.  Hyb-Seq: Combining target enrichment and genome skimming for plant phylogenomics , 2014, Applications in plant sciences.

[58]  M. Zanis,et al.  Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequence and inversion variation in Lasthenia burkei (Madieae, Asteraceae). , 2014, American journal of botany.

[59]  T. Embley,et al.  Conflicting Phylogenies for Early Land Plants are Caused by Composition Biases among Synonymous Substitutions , 2014, Systematic biology.

[60]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  From algae to angiosperms–inferring the phylogeny of green plants (Viridiplantae) from 360 plastid genomes , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[61]  Andrew J. Alverson,et al.  Horizontal Transfer of Entire Genomes via Mitochondrial Fusion in the Angiosperm Amborella , 2013, Science.

[62]  Antonis Rokas,et al.  Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals , 2013, Nature.

[63]  Susana M. Coelho,et al.  Genome structure and metabolic features in the red seaweed Chondrus crispus shed light on evolution of the Archaeplastida , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[65]  T. Vandergon,et al.  Loss of the Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase (accD) Gene in Poales , 2013, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[66]  Brian C. O'Meara,et al.  treePL: divergence time estimation using penalized likelihood for large phylogenies , 2012, Bioinform..

[67]  R. Lanfear,et al.  Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[68]  Shane S. Sturrock,et al.  Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data , 2012, Bioinform..

[69]  Saravanaraj N. Ayyampalayam,et al.  Phylogenomic analysis of transcriptome data elucidates co-occurrence of a paleopolyploid event and the origin of bimodal karyotypes in Agavoideae (Asparagaceae). , 2012, American journal of botany.

[70]  Jeffrey P. Mower,et al.  Plant Mitochondrial Genome Diversity: The Genomics Revolution , 2012 .

[71]  D. E. Soltis,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. , 2011, American journal of botany.

[72]  Felix Grewe,et al.  Mitochondrial Genome Evolution in the Plant Lineage , 2011 .

[73]  Y. Qiu,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes , 2010 .

[74]  Jeet Sukumaran,et al.  DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing , 2010, Bioinform..

[75]  Andrew J. Alverson,et al.  Insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genome size from complete sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[76]  Douglas L. Theobald,et al.  A formal test of the theory of universal common ancestry , 2010, Nature.

[77]  J. G. Burleigh,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  Bartek Wilczynski,et al.  Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics , 2009, Bioinform..

[79]  Tae-Kun Seo Calculating bootstrap probabilities of phylogeny using multilocus sequence data. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[80]  David Q. Matus,et al.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life , 2008, Nature.

[81]  Linda A. Raubeson,et al.  The complete plastid genome sequence of Welwitschia mirabilis: an unusually compact plastome with accelerated divergence rates , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[82]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[83]  D. Lavrov Key transitions in animal evolution: a mitochondrial DNA perspective. , 2007, Integrative and comparative biology.

[84]  Y. Qiu,et al.  A Nonflowering Land Plant Phylogeny Inferred from Nucleotide Sequences of Seven Chloroplast, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Genes , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[85]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[86]  M. Neiman,et al.  Inheritance and recombination of mitochondrial genomes in plants, fungi and animals. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[87]  R. Baker,et al.  Hidden likelihood support in genomic data: can forty-five wrongs make a right? , 2005, Systematic biology.

[88]  Peter G Foster,et al.  Modeling compositional heterogeneity. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[89]  A. Rokas,et al.  Animal mitochondrial DNA recombination revisited , 2003 .

[90]  M. Donoghue,et al.  The root of the angiosperms revisited , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[91]  H. Philippe,et al.  Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[92]  M. Sanderson Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[93]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  The evolution of isochores , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[94]  J. Palmer,et al.  Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[95]  James Lyons-Weiler,et al.  Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[97]  Yangrae Cho,et al.  Dynamic evolution of plant mitochondrial genomes: mobile genes and introns and highly variable mutation rates. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[98]  J. Palmer,et al.  Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[99]  C. dePamphilis,et al.  Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[100]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes , 1999, Nature.

[101]  M. Donoghue,et al.  The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. , 1999, Science.

[102]  W. John Kress,et al.  Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences , 1997 .

[103]  H. Mogensen,et al.  INVITED SPECIAL PAPER: The hows and whys of cytoplasmic inheritance in seed plants , 1996 .

[104]  D. Mccauley Contrasting the distribution of chloroplast DNA and allozyme polymorphism among local populations of Silene alba: implications for studies of gene flow in plants. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[105]  M T Clegg,et al.  Chloroplast gene sequences and the study of plant evolution. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  James F. Smith Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .

[107]  J. Doyle,et al.  Gene Trees and Species Trees: Molecular Systematics as One-Character Taxonomy , 1992 .

[108]  M. Asmussen,et al.  Comparative effects of pollen and seed migration on the cytonuclear structure of plant populations. II. Paternal cytoplasmic inheritance. , 1992, Genetics.

[109]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[110]  M. Asmussen,et al.  Comparative effects of pollen and seed migration on the cytonuclear structure of plant populations. I. Maternal cytoplasmic inheritance. , 1991, Genetics.

[111]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. , 1991 .

[112]  J. Palmer,et al.  Chloroplast DNA Variation and Plant Phylogeny , 1988 .

[113]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[114]  D. Robinson,et al.  Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .

[115]  J. Farris Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices , 1972, The American Naturalist.