Steady-state and dynamic flux balance analysis of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Steady-state and dynamic flux balance analysis (DFBA) was used to investigate the effects of metabolic model complexity and parameters on ethanol production predictions for wild-type and engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Three metabolic network models ranging from a single compartment representation of metabolism to a genome-scale reconstruction with seven compartments and detailed charge balancing were studied. Steady-state analysis showed that the models generated similar wild-type predictions for the biomass and ethanol yields, but for ten engineered strains the seven compartment model produced smaller ethanol yield enhancements. Simplification of the seven compartment model to two intracellular compartments produced increased ethanol yields, suggesting that reaction localisation had an impact on mutant phenotype predictions. Further analysis with the seven compartment model demonstrated that steady-state predictions can be sensitive to intracellular model parameters, with the biomass yield exhibiting high sensitivity to ATP utilisation parameters and the biomass composition. The incorporation of gene expression data through the zeroing of metabolic reactions associated with unexpressed genes was shown to produce negligible changes in steady-state predictions when the oxygen uptake rate was suitably constrained. Dynamic extensions of the single and seven compartment models were developed through the addition of glucose and oxygen uptake expressions and transient extracellular balances. While the dynamic models produced similar predictions of the optimal batch ethanol productivity for the wild type, the single compartment model produced significantly different predictions for four implementable gene insertions. A combined deletion/overexpression/insertion mutant with improved ethanol productivity capabilities was computationally identified by dynamically screening multiple combinations of the ten metabolic engineering strategies. The authors concluded that extensive compartmentalisation and detailed charge balancing can be important for reliably screening metabolic engineering strategies that rely on modification of the global redox balance and that DFBA offers the potential to identify novel mutants for enhanced metabolite production in batch and fed-batch cultures.

[1]  J. Heijnen,et al.  A Nletaboiic Network Analysis of Microbial Product Formation Stoichiometry Growth and , 1995 .

[2]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Metabolic Engineering: Principles And Methodologies , 1998 .

[3]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Statistical reconciliation of the elemental and molecular biomass composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  Estimating optimal profiles of genetic alterations using constraint-based models. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Eduardo Agosin,et al.  Modeling of yeast metabolism and process dynamics in batch fermentation , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  P. I. Barton,et al.  Global Mixed-Integer Dynamic Optimization , 2005 .

[8]  D. Kompala,et al.  Cybernetic model of the growth dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch and continuous cultures. , 1999, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  A. Burgard,et al.  Probing the performance limits of the Escherichia coli metabolic network subject to gene additions or deletions. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  B. Palsson,et al.  Towards multidimensional genome annotation , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  G. Stephanopoulos CHAPTER 1 – The Essence of Metabolic Engineering , 1998 .

[12]  J. Förster,et al.  In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[13]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  New algorithms for mixed-integer dynamic optimization , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  M. A. Henson,et al.  Genome‐scale analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism and ethanol production in fed‐batch culture , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  F. Doyle,et al.  Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Michael A Henson,et al.  Optimization of Fed‐Batch Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Using Dynamic Flux Balance Models , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  B. Palsson,et al.  Regulation of gene expression in flux balance models of metabolism. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Validation of a Metabolic Network for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Mixed Substrate Studies , 1996, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  B Sonnleitner,et al.  Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiratory capacity: Formulation and verification of a hypothesis , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. , 2003, Genome research.

[21]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. , 2004, Genome research.

[22]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Integration of gene expression data into genome-scale metabolic models. , 2004, Metabolic engineering.

[23]  B. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic Capabilities of Escherichia coli II. Optimal Growth Patterns , 1993 .

[24]  Costas D Maranas,et al.  OptStrain: a computational framework for redesign of microbial production systems. , 2004, Genome research.