Discounting in judgments of delay and probability.

Subjects drew lines proportional in length to their subjective valuation of various amounts of money, available immediately and certainly, relative to a standard amount ranging across groups from $1,000,000 to $10. They also drew lines proportional to their subjective valuation of standard amounts with delays ranging from 1 day to 50 years and with probabilities ranging from 1/10 to 1/10,000,000. Amounts of certain‐immediate moneyequivalent (in terms of drawn line length) to delayed or probabilistic money were determined. The delay and probability discount functions thereby obtained were hyperbolic in form, rather than exponential, consistent with previous findings. Large money amounts were valued higherwhentheyweredelayedbyadaythanwhenavailableimmediately.Steepness of delay discounting was not systematically related to standard money amount but probabilistic discounting was steeper for higher standard amounts than for lower amounts. Some of these results diAer from those obtained with choice procedures. Possible reasons for the diAerences are discussed. Copyright #2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[2]  P. Killeen On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  C. H. Coombs,et al.  Mathematical psychology : an elementary introduction , 1970 .

[4]  J. Staddon,et al.  The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .

[5]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  G. Ainslie,et al.  Impulse control in pigeons. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[8]  L. Green,et al.  On the directionality of key pecking during signals for appetitive and aversive events , 1977 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[11]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Cognition and behavior in studies of choice , 1986 .

[12]  G. Loewenstein Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption , 1987 .

[13]  J. E. Mazur An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[14]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  G. Ainslie Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person , 1992 .

[16]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[17]  J. E. Mazur Predicting the Strength of a Conditioned Reinforcer: Effects of Delay and Uncertainty , 1993 .

[18]  H. Rachlin,et al.  The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities , 1993 .

[19]  D. Cross,et al.  Lotteries and the Time Horizon , 1994 .

[20]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[21]  C. Harvey The reasonableness of non-constant discounting , 1994 .

[22]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward , 1995 .

[23]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Self-control: Beyond commitment. , 1995 .

[24]  H. de Wit,et al.  Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  K. Kirby,et al.  Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards , 1997 .