Embroidering Infertility: Using Art to Reveal and Resist Technobiopower in In Vitro Fertilisation Experiences

In the Western context of delayed motherhood and declining fertility, an array of fertility enhancements have emerged. While bioethical debates and literature on the technological prowess of these enhancements proliferate, it is useful to explore the lived experience of women undergoing them. This article uses Tabitha Moses’ artwork Investment, a series of embroidered hospital gowns, as a vehicle to explore lived experience of women engaging with fertility enhancements, including in vitro fertilisation. This analysis challenges dominant biomedical and corporate discourses framing fertility enhancements as benign. Using constructs of patriarchy, biopower, biopolitics (Foucault), and technobiopower (Haraway), we identify how power over women’s bodies is extended through fertility enhancements. Haraway’s notion of figuration supports the analysis. Understood as a tropic melding of semiotic and material, the figuration of The Infertile Woman offers a way to explore discursive operations of power and amid them the creation of a new form of reproductive labour.

[1]  Sianan Healy Broken bodies: oral histories of infertility after the women’s liberation movement , 2023, History Australia.

[2]  Luna Dolezal,et al.  Introduction: Self-Tracking, Embodied Differences, and Intersectionality , 2021, Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience.

[3]  Rosa M. Gonzalez-Guarda,et al.  CLINICAL BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS THAT INFLUENCE AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN TO INITIATE TREATMENT FOR INFERTILITY: A MIXED METHODS STUDY , 2020 .

[4]  L. Martin Delaying, debating and declining motherhood , 2020, Culture, health & sexuality.

[5]  N. Cogan,et al.  Baring all: The impact of the hospital gown on patient well-being. , 2020, British journal of health psychology.

[6]  G. Mounce,et al.  Transition to parenthood after successful non-donor in vitro fertilisation: The effects of infertility and in vitro fertilisation on previously infertile couples’ experiences of early parenthood , 2019, Health.

[7]  Yuhong Zhao,et al.  Global, regional, and national prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years for infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017 , 2019, Aging.

[8]  I. Kerridge,et al.  Conflicts of interest in Australia’s IVF industry: an empirical analysis and call for action , 2019, Human fertility.

[9]  P. Vercellini,et al.  A woman’s worth: The psychological impact of beliefs about motherhood, female identity, and infertility on childless women with endometriosis , 2019, Journal of health psychology.

[10]  B. Fauser Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of IVF outcomes. , 2019, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[11]  H. Maung Is infertility a disease and does it matter? , 2018, Bioethics.

[12]  Joe Leigh Simpson,et al.  Forty years of IVF. , 2018, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  Laura K. Briggs How All Politics Became Reproductive Politics , 2017 .

[14]  L. Rienzi,et al.  The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017 , 2017, Human reproduction.

[15]  Tania Pérez-Bustos,et al.  Thinking with Care. Unraveling and mending in an ethnography of craft embroidery and technology , 2017 .

[16]  Margaret Quinlan,et al.  Insiders and Outsiders and Insider(s) Again in the (In)fertility World , 2017, Health communication.

[17]  Stabile Bonnie Reproductive policy and the social construction of motherhood , 2016, Politics & Life Sciences.

[18]  I. Song,et al.  Fertility of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization by age , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[19]  Michal. Nahman,et al.  Romanian IVF: a brief history through the ‘lens’ of labour, migration and global egg donation markets , 2016, Reproductive biomedicine & society online.

[20]  Su-kyung Hwang From Priests’ to Actors’ Wardrobe: Controversial, Commercial, and Costumized Vestments , 2016 .

[21]  P. Patrizio,et al.  Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. , 2015, Human reproduction update.

[22]  Ashok Agarwal,et al.  A unique view on male infertility around the globe , 2015, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[23]  K. Abrahamson,et al.  Perceptions of Women with Infertility on Stigma and Disability , 2015 .

[24]  J. Elander,et al.  Managing multiple goals during fertility treatment: An interpretative phenomenological analysis , 2014, Journal of health psychology.

[25]  S. Franklin Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells, and the Future of Kinship , 2013 .

[26]  E. S. Roberts Assisted existence: an ethnography of being in Ecuador , 2013 .

[27]  Kalpana Wilson,et al.  Gender, agency, and coercion , 2013 .

[28]  Brittany Rouchou Consequences of infertility in developing countries , 2013, Perspectives in public health.

[29]  Katherine M. Johnson,et al.  Revisiting "her" infertility: medicalized embodiment, self-identification and distress. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[30]  T. Lavender,et al.  Advanced maternal age: delayed childbearing is rarely a conscious choice a qualitative study of women's views and experiences. , 2012, International journal of nursing studies.

[31]  Neeta Singh,et al.  Infertility , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology international.

[32]  H. Machado,et al.  Heterosexual couples’ uses and meanings of ovarian stimulation: Relatedness, embodiment and emotions , 2011, Health.

[33]  A. V. Bell Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[34]  D. Forster,et al.  Australian women's use of complementary and alternative medicines to enhance fertility: exploring the experiences of women and practitioners , 2009, BMC complementary and alternative medicine.

[35]  M. C. Inhorn,et al.  Right to assisted reproductive technology: Overcoming infertility in low‐resource countries , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[36]  C. Waldby,et al.  THE BIOPOLITICS OF REPRODUCTION , 2008 .

[37]  M. Porter,et al.  Limitations of infertility treatment: psychological, social and cultural , 2007 .

[38]  Wanda B. Knight Using Contemporary Art to Challenge Cultural Values, Beliefs, and Assumptions , 2006 .

[39]  Diana C. Parry Women’s Experiences with Infertility: Exploring the Outcome of Empowerment , 2005 .

[40]  S. D. Lacey IVF as lottery or investment: contesting metaphors in discourses of infertility. , 2002 .

[41]  A. Donchin Feminist critiques of new fertility technologies: implications for social policy. , 1996, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[42]  R. Nachtigall Eager for medicalisation: the social production of infertility as a disease , 1992 .

[43]  Maryanne Dever,et al.  The post-Fordist sexual contract : working and living in contingency , 2016 .

[44]  Karen Throsby When IVF Fails , 2004 .

[45]  C. Stabile Shooting the Mother: Fetal Photography and the Politics of Disappearance , 1992 .