Making evidential claims in epidemiology: Three strategies for the study of the exposome.

How is scientific data used to represent phenomena and as evidence for claims about phenomena? In this paper, I propose that a specific type of claims - evidential claims - is involved in data practices to define and restrict the representational and evidential content of a dataset. I present an account of data practices in the epidemiology of the exposome based on the notion of evidential claims, which helps unpack the approaches, assumptions and warrants that connect different stages of research. I identify three different strategies to generate different types of evidential claims in this case. The macro strategy, which individuates the dataset that serves as the initial evidential space for research. The micro strategy, which is used to generate evidential claims about the microscopic and individual component of target phenomena. The association strategy, that uses evidence from the other strategies to identify a dataset as representation of the different levels and relations of exposure and disease. Differentiating between these strategies sheds light on the multi-faceted landscape of biomedical research on environment and health; and the roles of data and evidence in the process of inquiry.

[1]  C. Wild,et al.  The exposome: from concept to utility. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Alex Broadbent,et al.  Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Wolfgang Pietsch,et al.  Two Modes of Reasoning with Case Studies , 2016 .

[4]  S. Leonelli.  What distinguishes data from models? , 2019, European Journal for Philosophy of Science.

[5]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Meeting-in-the-middle using metabolic profiling – a strategy for the identification of intermediate biomarkers in cohort studies , 2011, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[6]  C. Wild.  Complementing the Genome with an “Exposome”: The Outstanding Challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Big Data in Environment and Human Health , 2017 .

[8]  Stephen M Rappaport,et al.  Environment and Disease Risks , 2010, Science.

[9]  S. Rappaport.  Implications of the exposome for exposure science , 2011, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  J. Fuller.  Universal etiology, multifactorial diseases and the constitutive model of disease classification. , 2017, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[11]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Blood transcriptional and microRNA responses to short-term exposure to disinfection by-products in a swimming pool. , 2018, Environment international.

[12]  Alex Broadbent,et al.  Philosophy of epidemiology , 2014 .

[13]  Brendan Clarke,et al.  Causation in Medicine , 2012 .

[14]  S. Leonelli,et al.  Where health and environment meet: the use of invariant parameters in big data analysis , 2018, Synthese.

[15]  Martine Vrijheid,et al.  The Pregnancy Exposome , 2015, Current Environmental Health Reports.

[16]  M. Imboden,et al.  Land use regression models for the oxidative potential of fine particles (PM2.5) in five European areas , 2018, Environmental research.

[17]  Alison Wylie,et al.  How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back: Strategies for Putting Old Data to Work in New Ways , 2018 .

[18]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Deciphering the complex: Methodological overview of statistical models to derive OMICS‐based biomarkers , 2013, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[19]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  Causality in cancer research: a journey through models in molecular epidemiology and their philosophical interpretation , 2017, Emerging Themes in Epidemiology.

[20]  P. Vineis.  Exposomics: mathematics meets biology. , 2015, Mutagenesis.

[21]  A. Morabia.  Epidemiology: An epistemological perspective , 2004 .

[22]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Integrating data to acquire new knowledge: Three modes of integration in plant science. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[23]  M. Kogevinas,et al.  The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project , 2017, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[24]  S. Leonelli,et al.  Introduction: On the Philosophy of Science in Practice , 2013 .

[25]  Sabina Leonelli,et al.  Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study , 2016 .

[26]  Alison Wylie,et al.  Questions of Evidence, Legitimacy, and the (Dis)Unity of Science , 2000, American Antiquity.

[27]  S. Canali.  Evaluating evidential pluralism in epidemiology: mechanistic evidence in exposome research , 2019, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.

[28]  Robert Chapman,et al.  Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology , 2016 .

[29]  T. Bonnin.  Evidential reasoning in historical sciences: applying Toulmin schemes to the case of Archezoa , 2019, Biology & Philosophy.

[30]  J. Vlaanderen,et al.  Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the effect of air pollution on cardio‐ and cerebrovascular disease: A prospective study in nonsmokers , 2018, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[31]  W. Wimsatt,et al.  Articulating Babel: An approach to cultural evolution. , 2013, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.