The use of microcomputer based laboratories in chemistry secondary education: Present state of the art and ideas for research-based practice

In microcomputer based laboratories (MBL) and data loggers, one or more sensors are connected to an interphase and this to a computer. This equipment allows visualization in real time of the variables of an experiment and provides the possibility of measuring magnitudes which are difficult to measure with traditional equipment. Research shows that the advantages of using this technology go further than simply motivating students as they can improve other abilities, such as interpretation of graphs, and it can help to develop several competencies and higher order learning skills in students. The aims of this study are to learn about the potential of MBL in chemistry classrooms and to present a framework for research based lab sheets. In this work, research reporting significant learning in secondary school chemistry laboratory using an inquiry approach related to microcomputer based laboratory experiences is reviewed. Instructional effectiveness of the technology, research based materials for students, ideas for practice and opinions of teachers and students when using this technology are reviewed.

[1]  Hakan Yavuz Atar.  Chemistry Students' Challenges in Using MBL's in Science Laboratories. , 2002 .

[2]  L. Borghi,et al.  In-service teacher education: an attempt to link reflection on physics subjects with teaching practice , 2001 .

[3]  J. Bennett,et al.  The effect of ICT teaching activities in science lessons on students’ understanding of science ideas , 2006 .

[4]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[5]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts , 1994 .

[6]  E. Sassi,et al.  Teacher Training about Real-Time Approaches: Research-Based Guidelines and Training Materials. , 2005 .

[7]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[8]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Development and implementation of inquiry-based and computerized-based laboratories: reforming high school chemistry in Israel , 2010 .

[9]  V. Meisalo,et al.  Designing a user‐friendly microcomputer‐based laboratory package through the factor analysis of teacher evaluations , 2003 .

[10]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research , 1982 .

[11]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  The Role of the Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Display in Supporting the Construction of New Understandings in Kinematics , 2003 .

[12]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Datalogging: a unique affordance unrealized? , 2005 .

[13]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[14]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[15]  O. Kwon.  The Effect of Calculator‐Based Ranger Activities on Students' Graphing Ability , 2002 .

[16]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[17]  Mary E. Webb.  Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy , 2005 .

[18]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning , 1990 .

[19]  Bradley S. Ambrose.  Investigating student understanding in intermediate mechanics: Identifying the need for a tutorial approach to instruction , 2004 .

[20]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  THE LABORATORY IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION: THIRTY YEARS OF EXPERIENCE WITH DEVELOPMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND RESEARCH , 2004 .

[21]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  Role of the Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Display in Supporting the Construction of New Understandings in Thermal Physics , 2004 .

[22]  Roy Barton,et al.  Does data logging change the nature of children’s thinking in experimental work in science? , 2004 .

[23]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories , 1997 .

[24]  Maija Aksela,et al.  Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-assisted inquiry: A design research approach , 2005 .

[25]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories , 2005 .

[26]  Duncan Quarless,et al.  An Inquiry-Based Contextual Approach as the Primary Mode of Learning Science with Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Technology , 2010 .

[27]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Question Posing, Inquiry, and Modeling Skills of Chemistry Students in the Case-Based Computerized Laboratory Environment , 2009 .

[28]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[29]  Italo Testa,et al.  Students' reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs , 2002 .

[30]  L. Borghi,et al.  Developing relevant teaching strategies during in-service training , 2003 .

[31]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[32]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  The laboratory in science education: the state of the art , 2007 .

[33]  Michael Svec.  Improving Graphing Interpretation Skills and Understanding of Motion Using Microcomputer Based Laboratories , 1999 .

[34]  Ronald K. Thornton.  USING THE RESULTS OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION TO IMPROVE SCIENCE LEARNING , 1999 .

[35]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Characteristics of Meaningful Chemistry Education , 2005 .

[36]  P. Wild,et al.  Data‐logging: effects on practical science , 1996 .

[37]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Physics Learning and Microcomputer Based Laboratory (MBL) Learning Effects of Using MBL as a Technological and as a Cognitive Tool , 2003 .

[38]  Irit Sasson,et al.  Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case‐based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations , 2008 .

[39]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .