Relationship between downloads and citations at journal and paper levels, and the influence of language

Download indicators are of major potential interest because the great quantity of readily available download data means that any statistical inferences drawn from them will be of robust significance. We study the relationship between citation and downloads at the journal and paper levels, and the influence of language on that relationship. The data used were taken from the Scopus (citations) and ScienceDirect (downloads) databases. The results showed that downloads have limited utility as predictors of citation since it is in the early years when any correlations have the least significance. The relationship between downloads and citation also differs from one discipline to another. The relationship at the paper level is considerably weaker than at the journal level. This may be indicative of the number of downloads depending largely on the diffusion of the journal. In francophone regions, downloading from journals is proportionately less than citations to those same journals. There seems to be a part of citations to non-English-language journals which is invisible to Scopus. This makes the number of downloads proportionately greater than that of citations, leading to a lack of correlation between downloads and citations in that class of journal.

[1]  Jennifer Thompson,et al.  The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship , 2002 .

[2]  Carnot E. Nelson,et al.  Communication among scientists and engineers , 1970 .

[3]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  Reading factor as a credible alternative to impact factor: a preliminary study , 2000 .

[4]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011 , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach , 2007, Scientometrics.

[7]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Towards usage-based impact metrics: first results from the mesur project. , 2008, JCDL '08.

[8]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  Global usage versus global citation metrics: The case of pharmacology journals , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  M. Day.  Vatican newspaper reopens debate on defining death , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine , 2001 .

[11]  Iain D. Craig,et al.  Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Juan Gorraiz,et al.  Comparison of citation and usage indicators: the case of oncology journals , 2010, Scientometrics.

[13]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Lifting the crown - citation z-score , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Johan Bollen,et al.  A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  Julian Warner,et al.  The Role of monographs in scholarly Communication: an Empirical Study of Philosophy, Sociology and Economics , 1996, J. Documentation.

[16]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[17]  Peter T. Shepherd.  The feasibility of developing and implementing journal usage factors: a research project sponsored by UKSG , 2007 .

[18]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: definitions and relations , 2000 .

[19]  A. Craft.  Thomas Cyril Noble , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[22]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[23]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: An examination of their structure using citation indexes , 1979, Scientometrics.

[24]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  How balanced is the Science Citation Index's journal coverage? A preliminary overview of macrolevel statistical data , 2000 .

[25]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The bibliometric properties of article readership information: Research Articles , 2005 .

[26]  David A. Nock,et al.  Careers in Print: Canadian Sociological Books and Their Wider Impact, 1975-1992 [1] , 2001 .

[27]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Stephen S. Murray,et al.  The bibliometric properties of article readership information , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes,et al.  The iceberg hypothesis revisited , 2010, Scientometrics.

[30]  Grupo Scimago,et al.  Anàlisis de la cobertura de la base de datos Scopus , 2006 .

[31]  Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes,et al.  What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines? , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Johan Bollen,et al.  Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[33]  L. Hargens.  Using the Literature: Reference networks, reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[34]  H. Moed.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Information Science & Knowledge Management) , 2005 .

[35]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .

[36]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach , 2013, Scientometrics.

[37]  Rocío Gómez Crisóstomo,et al.  Import-export of knowledge between scientific subject categories: The iceberg hypothesis , 2007, Scientometrics.

[38]  B. Cronin,et al.  The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield , 2000 .

[39]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The journal download immediacy index (DII): experiences using a Chinese full-text database , 2010, Scientometrics.

[40]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.