Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA–WTP disparity: A meta analytical framework

Abstract We investigate the effects of certain factors related to study design and elicitation techniques on the WTA–WTP disparity. These factors are: explicit statement of the price, iterative bidding, within/between-subjects nature of the design, and out-of-pocket payments. We adopt a meta analytic approach to generalize from prior studies. This enables us to examine our hypotheses as well as other factors discussed in the literature. Our findings suggest that iterative bidding and within-subjects designs decrease the WTA–WTP disparity, whereas out-of-pocket payments increases the disparity – compared to tax reductions and other indirect payments. The effect of explicitly stating the price of the good to the respondents seems to be insignificant.

[1]  Charles D. Kolstad,et al.  Information and the Divergence between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay , 1999 .

[2]  Rebecca R Boyce An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a , 1992 .

[3]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[4]  C. Coombs,et al.  Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability , 1967 .

[5]  D. Brookshire,et al.  Valuing Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows , 1980 .

[6]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters , 1999 .

[7]  J. Farley,et al.  How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results , 1984 .

[8]  C. Garbacz,et al.  An Experiment in Valuing Senior Companion Program Services , 1983 .

[9]  Guido Ortona,et al.  New experiments on the endowment effect , 1992 .

[10]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value , 1987 .

[11]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space , 1980 .

[12]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures , 1987 .

[13]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk, ambiguity, and insurance , 1989 .

[14]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis , 1993 .

[15]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Comment , 2003 .

[16]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[17]  Martin O'Connor,et al.  Valuation and the environment: theory, method and practice. , 1999 .

[18]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Tests of market outcomes with asymmetric valuations of gains and losses: Smaller gains, fewer trades, and less value , 1998 .

[19]  Julie R. Irwin,et al.  Buying/Selling Price Preference Reversals: Preference for Environmental Changes in Buying Versus Selling Modes , 1994 .

[20]  Robin Gregory,et al.  The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity , 2003 .

[21]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Experiments on the Difference between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept , 1990 .

[22]  R. Dhar,et al.  Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods , 2000 .

[23]  K. McConnell,et al.  A Review of Wta/Wtp Studies , 2000 .

[24]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions , 1997 .

[25]  Jeff T. Casey Predicting Buyer-Seller Pricing Disparities , 1995 .

[26]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Amenity resource valuation: integrating economics with other disciplines. , 1988 .

[27]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[28]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity , 2001 .

[29]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  A. Henderson Consumer's Surplus and the Compensating Variation , 1941 .

[31]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[32]  D. Ariely,et al.  Focusing on the Forgone: How Value Can Appear So Different to Buyers and Sellers , 2000 .

[33]  Determinants of the magnitude of willingness to accept relative to willingness to pay , 2001 .

[34]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparison with a Stimulated Market , 1983 .

[35]  G. C. Morrison,et al.  Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: some evidence of an endowment effect , 1997 .

[36]  B. Mellers,et al.  Preferences, prices, and ratings in risky decision making. , 1992 .

[37]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[38]  Colin Camerer Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[39]  Martin Weber,et al.  Willingness-to-pay and willingness-to-accept for risky and ambiguous lotteries , 1995 .

[40]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  An experiment on the economic value of visibility , 1980 .

[41]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[42]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects , 1998 .

[43]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[44]  T. McDaniels,et al.  Reference points, loss aversion, and contingent values for auto safety , 1992 .

[45]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Utility Measurement: Configural-Weight Theory and the Judge's Point of View , 1992 .

[46]  William D. Schulze,et al.  The marginal value of job safety: A contingent valuation study , 1988 .

[47]  J. Shogren,et al.  Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept , 1997 .

[48]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Preference Reversals in Monetary and Life Expectancy Evaluations , 1995 .

[49]  Steven J. Kachelmeier,et al.  Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence from the People's Republic of China , 1992 .

[50]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Individual Rationality, Market Rationality, and Value Estimation , 2000 .

[51]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge's Point of View , 1979 .

[52]  J. Knetsch The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves. , 1989 .

[53]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[54]  John A. List,et al.  Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA , 2001 .

[55]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  Status quo bias in the measurement of value of service , 1990 .

[56]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Advances in behavioral economics , 2004 .

[57]  G. McClelland,et al.  The Disparity Between Willingness-to-Pay Versus Willingness-to-Accept as a Framing Effect , 1991 .

[58]  V. Pollock,et al.  Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. , 1994 .

[59]  Roland Michelitsch,et al.  Experimental tests of the endowment effect , 1996 .

[60]  Hans-Erik Uhlin,et al.  Moral dimensions of the WTA–WTP disparity: an experimental examination , 2000 .

[61]  H. F. Macdonald,et al.  An economic analysis of localized pollution: rendering emissions in a residential setting , 1993 .

[62]  P. Nelson Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[63]  M. Darby,et al.  Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[64]  W. Dubourg,et al.  Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity , 1994 .

[65]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[66]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Willingness-To-Pay vs. Willingness-To-Accept: Legal and Economic Implications, , 1993 .

[67]  G. McClelland,et al.  A Case Study of A Hazardous Waste Site: Perspectives From Economics and Psychology , 1986 .

[68]  David W Harless,et al.  More laboratory evidence on the disparity between willingness to pay and compensation demanded , 1989 .

[69]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[70]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[71]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Relationships among research design choices and psychometric properties of rating scales: A meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[72]  Robert D. Willig,et al.  Consumer's Surplus Without Apology , 1976 .