Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) Covid-19 Vaccine

Abstract Background The safety and efficacy of the AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine in a large, diverse population at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United States, Chile, and Peru has not been known. Methods In this ongoing, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial, we investigated the safety, vaccine efficacy, and immunogenicity of two doses of AZD1222 as compared with placebo in preventing the onset of symptomatic and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) 15 days or more after the second dose in adults, including older adults, in the United States, Chile, and Peru. Results A total of 32,451 participants underwent randomization, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive AZD1222 (21,635 participants) or placebo (10,816 participants). AZD1222 was safe, with low incidences of serious and medically attended adverse events and adverse events of special interest; the incidences were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Solicited local and systemic reactions were generally mild or moderate in both groups. Overall estimated vaccine efficacy was 74.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.3 to 80.5; P<0.001) and estimated vaccine efficacy was 83.5% (95% CI, 54.2 to 94.1) in participants 65 years of age or older. High vaccine efficacy was consistent across a range of demographic subgroups. In the fully vaccinated analysis subgroup, no severe or critical symptomatic Covid-19 cases were observed among the 17,662 participants in the AZD1222 group; 8 cases were noted among the 8550 participants in the placebo group (<0.1%). The estimated vaccine efficacy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (nucleocapsid antibody seroconversion) was 64.3% (95% CI, 56.1 to 71.0; P<0.001). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding and neutralizing antibodies increased after the first dose and increased further when measured 28 days after the second dose. Conclusions AZD1222 was safe and efficacious in preventing symptomatic and severe Covid-19 across diverse populations that included older adults. (Funded by AstraZeneca and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04516746.)

[1]  L. Danon,et al.  Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccination at preventing hospitalisations in people aged at least 80 years: a test-negative, case-control study , 2021, Lancet. Infectious Diseases (Print).

[2]  C. Robertson,et al.  Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study , 2021, BMJ.

[3]  Colin Simpson,et al.  Interim findings from first-dose mass COVID-19 vaccination roll-out and COVID-19 hospital admissions in Scotland: a national prospective cohort study , 2021, The Lancet.

[4]  J. Bussel,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  D. Goldblatt,et al.  Pathologic Antibodies to Platelet Factor 4 after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Koepsell,et al.  Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  F. Krammer Correlates of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, The Lancet.

[8]  Andreas Greinacher,et al.  Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Fridtjof Lund-Johansen,et al.  Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Bonsall,et al.  Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[11]  S. Madhi,et al.  Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant , 2021, The New England Journal of Medicine.

[12]  K. Neuzil,et al.  Are some COVID vaccines better than others? Interpreting and comparing estimates of efficacy in trials of COVID-19 vaccines , 2021, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[13]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Thrombocytopenia following Pfizer and Moderna SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination , 2021, American journal of hematology.

[14]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials , 2021, The Lancet.

[15]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK , 2020, Lancet.

[16]  Nguyen H. Tran,et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. , 2020, Lancet.

[17]  Lindsay N. Carpp,et al.  Clinical Endpoints for Evaluating Efficacy in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  John R. Mascola,et al.  A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R&D , 2020, Science.

[19]  Arman Behnam,et al.  COVID-19 Cases , 2020 .

[20]  Medicines And Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency , 2020, Definitions.

[21]  Ministerio de Salud Pública República Dominicana The Coronavirus , 2020 .

[22]  G. Zou,et al.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.