Jupiter Power Generation with Electrodynamic Tethers at Constant Orbital Energy

An electrodynamic tether system for power generation at Jupiter is presented that allows extracting energy from Jupiter's corotating plasmasphere while leaving the system orbital energy unaltered to first order. The spacecraft is placed in a polar orbit with the tether spinning in the orbital plane so that the resulting Lorentz force, neglecting Jupiter's magnetic dipole tilt, is orthogonal to the instantaneous velocity vector and orbital radius, hence affecting orbital inclination rather than orbital energy. In addition, the electrodynamic tether subsystem, which consists of two radial tether arms deployed from the main central spacecraft, is designed in such a way as to extract maximum power while keeping the resulting Lorentz torque constantly null. The power-generation performance of the system and the effect on the orbit inclination is evaluated analytically for different orbital conditions and verified numerically. Finally, a thruster-based inclination-compensation maneuver at apoapsis is added, resulting in an efficient scheme to extract energy from the plasmasphere of the planet with minimum propellant consumption and no inclination change. A tradeoff analysis is conducted showing that, depending on tether size and orbit characteristics, the system performance can be considerably higher than conventional power-generation methods.

[1]  Enrico C. Lorenzini,et al.  Bare Tethers for Electrodynamic Spacecraft Propulsion , 2000 .

[2]  R. D. Estes,et al.  The orbital-motion-limited regime of cylindrical Langmuir probes , 1999 .

[3]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  On the control of a permanent tethered observatory at Jupiter , 2008 .

[4]  Jesus Pelaez,et al.  Generator Regime of Self-Balanced Electrodynamic Bare Tethers , 2006 .

[5]  D. Scheeres,et al.  Three-Body Dynamics and Self-Powering of an Electrodynamic Tether in a Plasmasphere , 2010 .

[6]  Enrico C. Lorenzini,et al.  Exploration of outer planets using tethers for power and propulsion , 2005 .

[7]  C. Bombardelli,et al.  Electrodynamic Tether at Jupiter—I: Capture Operation and Constraints , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[8]  Yoshiki Yamagiwa,et al.  A proposed bare-tether experiment on board a sounding rocket , 2004 .

[9]  S. Synnott,et al.  Gravity field of the Saturnian system from Pioneer and Voyager tracking data , 1985 .

[10]  M. Grossi Spaceborne long vertical wire as a self-powered ULF/ELF radiator , 1984 .

[11]  Manuel Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Electrodynamic Tether Applications and Constraints , 2010 .

[12]  D. Scheeres,et al.  A permanent tethered observatory at Jupiter : dynamical analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Bare wire anodes for electrodynamic tethers , 1993 .

[14]  J. Sanmartín,et al.  A review of electrodynamic tethers for science applications , 2010 .

[15]  Steve Matousek,et al.  The Juno New Frontiers mission , 2005 .

[16]  M. Dobrowolny,et al.  Electrodynamics of long metallic tethers in the ionospheric plasma , 1978 .

[17]  M. Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Floating bare tether as upper atmosphere probe , 2006 .

[18]  J. Donoso,et al.  The radiation impedance of electrodynamic tethers in a polar Jovian orbit , 2010 .

[19]  S. D. Drell,et al.  Drag and propulsion of large satellites in the ionosphere: An Alfvén propulsion engine in space , 1965 .

[20]  Eduardo Ahedo,et al.  Analysis of Bare-Tether Systems for Deorbiting Low-Earth-Orbit Satellites , 2002 .

[21]  Henry B. Garrett,et al.  Charged particle distributions in Jupiter's magnetosphere , 1983 .

[22]  Robert D. Estes,et al.  Magnetic self‐field effects on current collection by an ionospheric bare tether , 2002 .