Histopathological Image Analysis Using Model-Based Intermediate Representations and Color Texture: Follicular Lymphoma Grading

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a cancer of lymph system and it is the second most common lymphoid malignancy in the western world. Currently, the risk stratification of FL relies on histological grading method, where pathologists evaluate hematoxilin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections under a microscope as recommended by the World Health Organization. This manual method requires intensive labor in nature. Due to the sampling bias, it also suffers from inter- and intra-reader variability and poor reproducibility. We are developing a computer-assisted system to provide quantitative assessment of FL images for more consistent evaluation of FL. In this study, we proposed a statistical framework to classify FL images based on their histological grades. We introduced model-based intermediate representation (MBIR) of cytological components that enables higher level semantic description of tissue characteristics. Moreover, we introduced a novel color-texture analysis approach that combines the MBIR with low level texture features, which capture tissue characteristics at pixel level. Experimental results on real follicular lymphoma images demonstrate that the combined feature space improved the accuracy of the system significantly. The implemented system can identify the most aggressive FL (grade III) with 98.9% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity and the overall classification accuracy of the system is 85.5%.

[1]  James Olen Armitage,et al.  A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. , 1997, Blood.

[2]  P. Banks,et al.  Use of the working formulation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in epidemiologic studies: agreement between reported diagnoses and a panel of experienced pathologists. , 1987, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[4]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[5]  Kim L. Boyer,et al.  Computer-Aided Grading of Neuroblastic Differentiation: Multi-Resolution and Multi-Classifier Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  C C Whitcomb,et al.  Morphological subclassification of follicular lymphoma: variability of diagnoses among hematopathologists, a collaborative study between the Repository Center and Pathology Panel for Lymphoma Clinical Studies. , 1985, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Selim Aksoy,et al.  Learning bayesian classifiers for scene classification with a visual grammar , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Tae-Sun Choi,et al.  Image indexing by modified color co-occurrence matrix , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[9]  Jun Kong,et al.  Texture classification using nonlinear color quantization: Application to histopathological image analysis , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[10]  Georgios S. Paschos,et al.  Perceptually uniform color spaces for color texture analysis: an empirical evaluation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[13]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  PCA versus LDA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Rudolf Hanka,et al.  Histological image retrieval based on semantic content analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[15]  Tae-Sun Choi,et al.  Image indexing by modified color cooccurrence matrix , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[16]  Fernand Meyer,et al.  Topographic distance and watershed lines , 1994, Signal Process..

[17]  Constantine Katsinis,et al.  Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer , 2006, BMC Medical Imaging.

[18]  J A Beliën,et al.  Origins of ... image analysis in clinical pathology. , 1997, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  A. Benassi,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF THE COOCCURRENCE MATRIX FOR COLOUR IMAGES: APPLICATION TO COLOUR TEXTURE CLASSIFICATION , 2011 .

[20]  Selim Aksoy,et al.  Modeling of Remote Sensing Image Content Using Attributed Relational Graphs , 2006, SSPR/SPR.

[21]  Cigdem Demir,et al.  Augmented cell-graphs for automated cancer diagnosis , 2005, ECCB/JBI.

[22]  Mikhail Teverovskiy,et al.  Multifeature Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[24]  H. Ney,et al.  Local Features for Image Classification , .

[25]  B. Nathwani,et al.  A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group Classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a report of the Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project , 1997 .

[26]  E. Elonen,et al.  Tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: general guidelines , 2004 .

[27]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[28]  J. Saltz,et al.  Image Analysis for Neuroblastoma Classification: Segmentation of Cell Nuclei , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  R. Halír Numerically Stable Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses , 1998 .