The overall objective of this study was to assess the use of Level 1 analysis for mechanistic-empirical (ME) rehabilitation designs of deteriorated polymer-modified asphalt concrete (AC) pavements in Nevada using the AASHTOWare® Pavement ME software. This research also explored the possible implementation of a hybrid approach for AC damage characterization to overcome the challenges associated with the use of the Witczak model for estimating the undamaged dynamic modulus master curve of the existing AC layer. Two rehabilitation field projects were used as part of this study. The experimental plan involved falling weight deflectometer (FWD) testing in the right wheelpath before rehabilitation, analysis of core samples, estimation of an equivalent undamaged dynamic modulus, and estimation of equivalent damaged dynamic modulus from FWD backcalculation. The proposed hybrid approach consisted of conducting laboratory dynamic modulus testing on the collected core samples and estimating an equivalent undamaged dynamic modulus at the same FWD testing temperature and loading frequency. The pre-overlay damage, characterized based on the approach in Pavement ME Design software (i.e., using a Witczak prediction model and backcalculated modulus), showed overly high values that did not match with the collected pre-overlay distress data on either of the rehabilitation projects. Based on the findings from this study, the hybrid approach was recommended for implementation by Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) when designing AC overlay over polymer-modified asphalt pavements in Nevada. Recommendations for user inputs were also provided for future consideration in Pavement ME Design software.
[1]
K Close,et al.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX
,
1976
.
[2]
R. Briggs,et al.
Temperature predictions and adjustment factors for asphalt pavement
,
2000
.
[3]
Tom Scullion,et al.
MODULUS 6.0 for Windows: User's Manual
,
2001
.
[4]
N. Gibson,et al.
A New Simplistic Model for Dynamic Modulus Predictions of Asphalt Paving Mixtures
,
2006
.
[5]
Halil Ceylan,et al.
Accuracy of Predictive Models for Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt
,
2009
.
[6]
Leslie Ann Myers,et al.
Field Evaluation of Witczak and Hirsch Models for Predicting Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt (With Discussion)
,
2005
.
[7]
David E. Newcomb,et al.
Thin Asphalt Overlays for Pavement Preservation
,
2009
.
[8]
S Yousefdoost,et al.
Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive models for typical Australian asphalt mixes
,
2013
.
[9]
Matthew W Witczak,et al.
Development of a New Revised Version of the Witczak E* Predictive Model for Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures (With Discussion)
,
2006
.
[10]
Sesh Commuri,et al.
Evaluation of Predictive Models for Estimating Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt in Oklahoma
,
2011
.