Understanding Gender Differences to Improve Equity in Computer Programming Education

The increasing wealth of data available from large online programming courses offers exciting opportunities to improve equity in computer science education. In particular, it can provide insight into potential causes of differences between groups, informing future investigations, course development and educational policies. In this paper, we analyse differences between male and female high school and primary school students across five programming courses of different difficult levels (n=14,570), including block-based and traditional text-based courses. We examine differences in course enrolment, completion rates and student behaviour while solving the exercises, and consider the impact of grade level, enrolment and course type. We find that, while females are underrepresented in the courses, performance differences only occur in specific circumstances, and in both directions. This suggests that the differences between male and female students are not fundamental, and that there is potential to address them by better understanding these circumstances.

[1]  Irena Koprinska,et al.  Exploring and Following Students' Strategies When Completing Their Weekly Tasks , 2016, EDM.

[2]  Maria M. Klawe,et al.  Women in computing---take 2 , 2009, CACM.

[3]  Irena Koprinska,et al.  Mining behaviors of students in autograding submission system logs , 2016, EDM.

[4]  Aman Yadav,et al.  Learning to Program: Gender Differences and Interactive Effects of Students' Motivation, Goals, and Self-Efficacy on Performance , 2016, ICER.

[5]  Elizabeth Johnson,et al.  Still a stranger here: attitudes among secondary school students towards computer science , 2003, ITiCSE '03.

[6]  James R. Curran,et al.  A Data-Driven Method for Helping Teachers Improve Feedback in Computer Programming Automated Tutors , 2018, AIED.

[7]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades , 2014, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[8]  Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al.  A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences , 2002, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[9]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Explaining the IT Gender Gap: Australian Stories for the New Millenium , 2003, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol..

[10]  J. Edwards,et al.  A Sorry Tale - A Study of Women's Participation in IT Higher Education in Australia , 2001, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Amy Pearl,et al.  Women in computing , 1995, CACM.

[12]  Giuseppe Riccardi,et al.  Predicting students' final exam scores from their course activities , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[13]  Claudia Szabo,et al.  Gender Gap in Academia: Perceptions of Female Computer Science Academics , 2015, ITiCSE.

[14]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Gender Differences in Computer Science Education: Lessons Learnt from an Empirical Study at NTNU , 2016, NIK.