Performance evaluation of passive direct methanol fuel cell with methanol vapour supplied through a flow channel

Abstract This work examines the effect of fuel delivery configuration on the performance of a passive air-breathing direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC). The performance of a single cell is evaluated while the methanol vapour is supplied through a flow channel from a methanol reservoir connected to the anode. The oxygen is supplied from the ambient air to the cathode via natural convection. The fuel cell employs parallel channel configurations or open chamber configurations for methanol vapour feeding. The opening ratio of the flow channel and the flow channel configuration is changed. The opening ratio is defined as that between the area of the inlet port and the area of the outlet port. The chamber configuration is preferred for optimum fuel feeding. The best performance of the fuel cell is obtained when the opening ratio is 0.8 in the chamber configuration. Under these conditions, the peak power is 10.2 mW cm−2 at room temperature and ambient pressure. Consequently, passive DMFCs using methanol vapour require sufficient methanol vapour feeding through the flow channel at the anode for best performance. The mediocre performance of a passive DMFC with a channel configuration is attributed to the low differential pressure and insufficient supply of methanol vapour.

[1]  Dae Sik Hong,et al.  Current density dependence on performance degradation of direct methanol fuel cells , 2006 .

[2]  Y. H. Pan.  Advanced air-breathing direct methanol fuel cells for portable applications , 2006 .

[3]  R. Kikuchi,et al.  Electrochemical oxidation of CO over tin oxide supported platinum catalysts , 2006 .

[4]  Bing-Joe Hwang,et al.  Investigations of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) fading mechanisms , 2007 .

[5]  Rong Chen,et al.  A small mono-polar direct methanol fuel cell stack with passive operation , 2008 .

[6]  Jenn-Jiang Hwang,et al.  Effect of breathing-hole size on the electrochemical species in a free-breathing cathode of a DMFC , 2006 .

[7]  H. Chu,et al.  Transient behavior of CO poisoning of the anode catalyst layer of a PEM fuel cell , 2006 .

[8]  Z. Qi,et al.  Effect of CO in the anode fuel on the performance of PEM fuel cell cathode , 2002 .

[9]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Performance evaluation of passive DMFC single cells , 2006 .

[10]  Inseob Song,et al.  Mass balance research for high electrochemical performance direct methanol fuel cells with reduced methanol crossover at various operating conditions , 2008 .

[11]  M. Inaba,et al.  Impacts of air bleeding on membrane degradation in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2008 .

[12]  Jiujun Zhang,et al.  Design and testing of a passive planar three-cell DMFC , 2007 .

[13]  Hyuk Chang,et al.  Nafion based organic/inorganic composite membrane for air-breathing direct methanol fuel cells , 2007 .

[14]  C. Chen,et al.  Performance of an air-breathing direct methanol fuel cell , 2003 .

[15]  Angelika Heinzel,et al.  A review of the state-of-the-art of the methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[16]  H. Ha,et al.  Behavioral pattern of a monopolar passive direct methanol fuel cell stack , 2006 .

[17]  W. Preidel,et al.  Status of the development of a direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[18]  S. Wasmus,et al.  Methanol oxidation and direct methanol fuel cells: a selective review 1 In honour of Professor W. Vi , 1999 .

[19]  John Davey,et al.  Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory , 2000 .

[20]  D. Jung,et al.  Performance of a direct methanol polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 1998 .

[21]  Hae-Kyoung Kim,et al.  Passive direct methanol fuel cells fed with methanol vapor , 2006 .

[22]  Keith Scott,et al.  The degree and effect of methanol crossover in the direct methanol fuel cell , 1998 .