Nonlinear anisotropic stress analysis of anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysms.

BACKGROUND Static deformation analysis and estimation of wall stress distribution of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms can provide useful insights into the disease process and rupture. METHOD OF APPROACH The three-dimensional geometry of saccular cerebral aneurysms from 27 patients (18 unruptured and nine ruptured) was reconstructed based on computer tomography angiography images. The aneurysm wall tissue was modeled using a nonlinear, anisotropic, hyperelastic material model (Fung-type) which was incorporated in a user subroutine in ABAQUS. Effective material fiber orientations were assumed to align with principal surface curvatures. Static deformation of the aneurysm models were simulated assuming uniform wall thickness and internal pressure load of 100 mm Hg. RESULTS The numerical analysis technique was validated by quantitative comparisons to results in the literature. For the patient-specific models, in-plane stresses in the aneurysm wall along both the stiff and weak fiber directions showed significant regional variations with the former being higher. The spatial maximum of stress ranged from as low as 0.30 MPa in a small aneurysm to as high as 1.06 MPa in a giant aneurysm. The patterns of distribution of stress, strain, and surface curvature were found to be similar. Sensitivity analyses showed that the computed stress is mesh independent and not very sensitive to reasonable perturbations in model parameters, and the curvature-based criteria for fiber orientations tend to minimize the total elastic strain energy in the aneurysms wall. Within this small study population, there were no statistically significant differences in the spatial means and maximums of stress and strain values between the ruptured and unruptured groups. However, the ratios between the stress components in the stiff and weak fiber directions were significantly higher in the ruptured group than those in the unruptured group. CONCLUSIONS A methodology for nonlinear, anisotropic static deformation analysis of geometrically realistic aneurysms was developed, which can be used for a more accurate estimation of the stresses and strains than previous methods and to facilitate prospective studies on the role of stress in aneurysm rupture.

[1]  Padmanabhan Seshaiyer,et al.  A sub-domain inverse finite element characterization of hyperelastic membranes including soft tissues. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Effect of Variation in Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Properties on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  G J Hademenos,et al.  A nonlinear mathematical model for the development and rupture of intracranial fusiform aneurysms. , 1994, Neurological research.

[5]  William Sutherland,et al.  The Elasticity of Rubber Balloons and Hollow Viscera , 1909 .

[6]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  Identification of response functions from axisymmetric membrane inflation tests: Implications for biomechanics , 1994 .

[7]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  G. Ferguson,et al.  Comparison of the elastic properties of human intracranial arteries and aneurysms. , 1972, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[9]  J. Humphrey,et al.  On the potentially protective role of contact constraints on saccular aneurysms. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Finite element analysis of nonlinear orthotropic hyperelastic membranes , 1996 .

[11]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Further evidence for the dynamic stability of intracranial saccular aneurysms. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[13]  Simkins Te,et al.  Vibrations recorded from the adventitial surface of experimental aneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas. , 1974 .

[14]  P. Canham,et al.  Directional Wall Strength in Saccular Brain Aneurysms from Polarized Light Microscopy , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Nonlinear Hyperelastic Membranes , 1997 .

[16]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  A triplane video-based experimental system for studying axisymmetrically inflated biomembranes , 1995 .

[17]  J A Kiernan,et al.  Layered structure of saccular aneurysms assessed by collagen birefringence. , 1999, Neurological research.

[18]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  István Nyáry,et al.  Sterically Inhomogenous Viscoelastic Behavior of Human Saccular Cerebral Aneurysms , 1998, Journal of Vascular Research.

[20]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  Multiaxial Mechanical Behavior of Human Saccular Aneurysms , 2001 .

[21]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  Further Roles of Geometry and Properties in the Mechanics of Saccular Aneurysms. , 1998, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  R. Ogden,et al.  A New Constitutive Framework for Arterial Wall Mechanics and a Comparative Study of Material Models , 2000 .

[23]  Jay R. Walton,et al.  The Convexity Properties of a Class of Constitutive Models for Biological Soft Issues , 2002 .

[24]  G. Ferguson,et al.  A mathematical model for the mechanics of saccular aneurysms. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[25]  Rune Aaslid,et al.  Strength, elasticity and viscoelastic properties of cerebral aneurysms , 2005, Heart and Vessels.

[26]  Nuri Akkas,et al.  Aneurysms as a Biomechanical Instability Problem , 1990 .

[27]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Three-Dimensional Geometrical Characterization of Cerebral Aneurysms , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  M. Epstein,et al.  Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs , 2002 .

[29]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  P. Canham,et al.  Stereological analysis of the layered collagen of human intracranial aneurysms , 1996, Journal of microscopy.

[31]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Finite strain elastodynamics of intracranial saccular aneurysms. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  P. Canham,et al.  Layered collagen fabric of cerebral aneurysms quantitatively assessed by the universal stage and polarized light microscopy , 1991, The Anatomical record.

[33]  J. D. Humphrey,et al.  Finite Element Based Predictions of Preferred Material Symmetries in Saccular Aneurysms , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  T. Borg,et al.  Collagen expression in mechanically stimulated cardiac fibroblasts. , 1991, Circulation research.